12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

764 <strong>Money</strong>, <strong>Bank</strong> <strong>Credit</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Cycles</strong><strong>The</strong>refore a system composed of a pure gold st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>and</strong>a 100-percent reserve requirement would not weaken economicdevelopment. In fact, such a system would give rise toa model of stable, continuous development, free from themanic-depressive reactions which we have, with difficulty,become used to <strong>and</strong> which, unfortunately, involve the regularmalinvestment of a huge quantity of society’s scarceresources, to the serious detriment of sustainable economicgrowth <strong>and</strong> harmony in society.3. “<strong>The</strong> proposed model would penalize those who profit from thecurrent banking <strong>and</strong> financial system.” It has at times beenargued that the recommended system would unjustly penalizeall those who profit from the present financial <strong>and</strong> bankingsystem. Among its chief beneficiaries we must first list thegovernment, which, as we know, manages to finance itsexpenditures (directly <strong>and</strong> indirectly) via credit expansion,without having to resort to the politically painful measure ofraising taxes. Next we could mention bankers themselves(who line their pockets by the same procedures as the government,yet directly <strong>and</strong> privately), <strong>and</strong> also depositors, if theyreceive interest on their deposits <strong>and</strong> “do not pay” for the setof peripheral services banks perform. 64Nevertheless those who voice this objection do not takeinto account that many of the supposed “profits” individualsobtain from the banking system are not truly profits. Indeedit is inaccurate to argue that depositors currently enjoy substantialbenefits (in the form of cashier, payment <strong>and</strong> bookkeepingservices) without paying for them, since depositorspercent), the nominal market interest rate will be approximately 2.5 percentper year. In footnote 49 we supposed nominal interest rates wouldbe even lower, due to population growth <strong>and</strong> a consequent, perenniallow increase in the dem<strong>and</strong> for money.64 Under competitive conditions the benefits are partly enjoyedby the holders of fractionally-backed bank liabilities themselves,whose gain takes the form of explicit interest paymentsor lowered bank service charges or a combination ofthese. (Selgin, “Are <strong>Bank</strong>ing Crises a Free-Market Phenomenon?”p. 3).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!