12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A Proposal for <strong>Bank</strong>ing Reform:<strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>ory of a 100-Percent Reserve Requirement 731THE OLD CHICAGO-SCHOOL TRADITION OF SUPPORTFOR A 100-PERCENT RESERVE REQUIREMENT<strong>The</strong> Chicago School prescription of a 100-percent reserverequirement dates back to March 16, 1933, when Henry C.Simons, Lloyd W. Mints, Aaron Director, Frank H. Knight,Henry Schultz, Paul H. Douglas, Albert G. Hart <strong>and</strong> others circulatedan anonymous six-page document called “<strong>Bank</strong>ing<strong>and</strong> Currency Reform.” 18 Albert G. Hart later exp<strong>and</strong>ed onthis program in his article, “<strong>The</strong> ‘Chicago Plan’ of <strong>Bank</strong>ingReform,” published in 1935. Here Hart expressly recognizesProfessor <strong>Ludwig</strong> <strong>von</strong> <strong>Mises</strong> as the ultimate father of the proposal.19 Later, in November of 1935, James W. Angell publisheda comprehensive article in which he defends this position<strong>and</strong> analyzes its different aspects. His article is entitled“<strong>The</strong> 100-Percent Reserve Plan,” 20 <strong>and</strong> was followed by apaper by Henry C. Simons, “Rules versus Authorities in MonetaryPolicy,” which appeared in 1936. 21Of the Chicago theorists, Henry C. Simons comes closestto the thesis that a 100-percent reserve requirement is not amere economic-policy proposal, but an imperative of theinstitutional framework of rules which is vital for the correctfunctioning of a market economy. Indeed Simons asserts:18 See Ronnie J. Phillips, <strong>The</strong> Chicago Plan <strong>and</strong> New Deal <strong>Bank</strong>ing Reform(Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, 1995), pp. 191–98.19 Albert G. Hart, “<strong>The</strong> ‘Chicago Plan’ of <strong>Bank</strong>ing Reform,” Review of<strong>Economic</strong> Studies 2 (1935): 104–16. <strong>The</strong> reference to professors <strong>Mises</strong> <strong>and</strong>Hayek appears at the foot of p. 104. Another interesting precedent forthe Chicago Plan is found in a book by Frederick Soddy, a recipient ofthe Nobel Prize for Chemistry: Wealth, Virtual Wealth <strong>and</strong> Debt (NewYork: E.P. Dutton, 1927). Knight wrote a favorable review of Soddy’sbook that same year: “Review of Frederick Soddy’s Wealth, VirtualWealth <strong>and</strong> Debt,” Saturday Review of Literature (April 16, 1927): 732.20 James W. Angell, “<strong>The</strong> 100 Percent Reserve Plan,” <strong>The</strong> Quarterly Journalof <strong>Economic</strong>s 50, no. 1 (November 1935): 1–35.21 Henry C. Simons, “Rules versus Authorities in Monetary Policy,” Journalof Political Economy 44, no. 1 (February 1936): 1–30.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!