12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

716 <strong>Money</strong>, <strong>Bank</strong> <strong>Credit</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Cycles</strong>1A HISTORY OF MODERN THEORIES IN SUPPORT OFA 100-PERCENT RESERVE REQUIREMENTWe know that distrust of fractional-reserve banking datesback at least as far as the Salamancan theorists of the sixteenth<strong>and</strong> seventeenth centuries, David Hume in the eighteenth century,theorists of the school of Jefferson <strong>and</strong> Jackson in thedecades following the founding of the United States, <strong>and</strong> theimportant group of theorists from nineteenth-century continentalEurope (Modeste <strong>and</strong> Cernuschi in France; Michaelis,Hübner, Geyer, <strong>and</strong> Tellkampf in Germany). Moreover, certainhighly distinguished economists of the twentieth century,such as <strong>Ludwig</strong> <strong>von</strong> <strong>Mises</strong> <strong>and</strong> at least four recipients of theNobel Prize for <strong>Economic</strong>s (Friedrich A. Hayek, Milton Friedman,James Tobin, <strong>and</strong> Maurice Allais) have at some pointdefended the establishment of a 100-percent reserve requirementon dem<strong>and</strong> deposits placed at banks.THE PROPOSAL OF LUDWIG VON MISES<strong>Ludwig</strong> <strong>von</strong> <strong>Mises</strong> was the first twentieth-century economistto propose the establishment of a banking system with a100-percent reserve requirement on dem<strong>and</strong> deposits. <strong>Mises</strong>made his recommendation in the first edition of his book, <strong>The</strong><strong>The</strong>ory of <strong>Money</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Credit</strong>, published in 1912. At the end ofthis first edition, in a section literally reproduced in the second,which was printed in 1924, <strong>Mises</strong> draws the followingconclusion:Fiduciary media are scarcely different in nature frommoney; a supply of them affects the market in the same wayas a supply of money proper; variations in their quantityinfluence the objective exchange value of money in just thesame way as do variations in the quantity of money proper.Hence, they should logically be subjected to the same principlesthat have been established with regard to moneyproper; the same attempts should be made in their case aswell to eliminate as far as possible human influence on theexchange ratio between money <strong>and</strong> other economic goods.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!