12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Central <strong>and</strong> Free <strong>Bank</strong>ing <strong>The</strong>ory 711eliminating from the corresponding instruments an importantcharacteristic of money: perfect, i.e., immediate, complete, <strong>and</strong>never conditional, liquidity. Thus not only would depositorsbecome forced lenders at the will of the banker, but a depositwould become a type of aleatory contract or lottery, in whichthe possibility of withdrawing the cash deposited woulddepend on the particular circumstances of each moment.<strong>The</strong>re can be no objection to the voluntary decision of certainparties to enter into such an atypical aleatory contract as thatmentioned above. However, even if a “safeguard” clause wereintroduced <strong>and</strong> participants (bankers <strong>and</strong> their customers)of the notes banks had issued. Thus, in reference to bank runs, Selginstates:<strong>Bank</strong>s in a free banking system might however avoid such afate by issuing liabilities contractually subject to a ‘restriction’of base money payments. By restricting payments banks caninsulate the money stock <strong>and</strong> other nominal magnitudes frompanic-related effects. (Selgin, “Free <strong>Bank</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> MonetaryControl,” p. 1455)<strong>The</strong> fact that Selgin considers resorting to such clauses to avoid bankruns is as significant in terms of the “solvency” of his own theory as itis surprising from a legal perspective that the attempt is made to base asystem on the expropriation, albeit partial <strong>and</strong> temporary, of the propertyrights of depositors <strong>and</strong> note holders, who, in a crisis, would betransformed into forced lenders <strong>and</strong> would no longer be considered truedepositors <strong>and</strong> holders of monetary units, or more specifically, perfectmoney substitutes. Let us remember a comment from Adam Smith himself:<strong>The</strong> directors of some of those [Scottish] banks sometimestook advantage of this optional clause, <strong>and</strong> sometimes threatenedthose who dem<strong>and</strong>ed gold <strong>and</strong> silver in exchange for aconsiderable number of their notes, that they would takeadvantage of it, unless such dem<strong>and</strong>ers would content themselveswith a part of what they dem<strong>and</strong>ed. (Smith, An Inquiryinto the Nature <strong>and</strong> Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Book II,chap. 2, pp. 394–95)On option clauses, see Parth J. Shah, “<strong>The</strong> Option Clause in Free <strong>Bank</strong>ing<strong>The</strong>ory <strong>and</strong> History: A Reappraisal,” a manuscript presented at the2nd Austrian Scholars Conference (Auburn, Ala.: <strong>Ludwig</strong> <strong>von</strong> <strong>Mises</strong>Institute, April 4–5, 1997), later printed in the Review of Austrian <strong>Economic</strong>s10, no. 2 (1997): 1–25.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!