12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

700 <strong>Money</strong>, <strong>Bank</strong> <strong>Credit</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Cycles</strong>sacrifice in consumption has not taken place, <strong>and</strong> investmentis financed by created credit, then the productive structure isinvariably distorted, even if the newly-created fiduciarymedia correspond to a previous rise in the dem<strong>and</strong> for them.Hence Selgin is obliged to redefine the concepts of saving <strong>and</strong>credit creation. He claims saving occurs ipso facto the momentnew fiduciary media are created, provided their initial holdercould spend them on consumer goods <strong>and</strong> does not. Selginalso maintains that credit expansion does not generate cycles ifit tends to match a prior increase in the dem<strong>and</strong> for fiduciarymedia. In short these arguments resemble those Keynesexpresses in his General <strong>The</strong>ory, arguments refuted long ago, aswe saw in chapter 7.<strong>The</strong> creation of fiduciary media also entails an increase inthe money supply <strong>and</strong> a consequent decrease in the purchasingpower of money. In this way banks collectively <strong>and</strong> almostimperceptibly “expropriate” the value of citizens’ monetaryunits. It certainly smacks of a bad joke to declare that the economicagents who suffer such expropriation are actually (voluntarily?)“saving.” It is not surprising that these doctrineshave been defended by authors like Keynes, Tobin, Pointdexter<strong>and</strong>, in general, all who have justified inflationism, creditexpansion <strong>and</strong> the “euthanasia of the rentier” for the sake ofaggressive economic policies geared to insure an “adequate”level of “aggregate dem<strong>and</strong>.” What is surprising, however, isthat authors like Selgin <strong>and</strong> Horwitz, who belong (or at leastbelonged) to the Austrian School <strong>and</strong> thus should be moreaware of the dangers involved, have had no alternative but toresort to this sort of argument in order to justify their “fractional-reservefree-banking” system. 144144 As an additional advantage of the system he proposes, Selgin mentionsthat economic agents who maintain cash balances in the form offiduciary media created in a free-banking system can obtain a financialyield on their money <strong>and</strong> use a series of banking facilities (payment,bookkeeping, cashier, etc.) “free of charge.” However Selgin fails tomention certain costs of fractional-reserve free banking, such as artificialbooms, malinvestment of resources, <strong>and</strong> economic crises. He also fails totouch on what we definitely consider the highest cost: the harmful effectsof the violation of legal principles in a free-banking system give rise to a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!