12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

674 <strong>Money</strong>, <strong>Bank</strong> <strong>Credit</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Cycles</strong>keeping with <strong>Mises</strong>’s view, the above proposal entails the substitutionof several clear, simple articles, to appear in the commercial<strong>and</strong> penal codes, for the current web of administrativebanking legislation, which has not achieved the objectives setfor it. 101It is interesting to note that modern defenders of fractional-reservefree banking wrongly believe, due in part totheir lack of legal preparation, that a 100-percent reserverequirement would amount to an unfair administrativerestriction of individual freedom. Nevertheless, as the analysisof the first three chapters shows, nothing could be furtherfrom the truth. For these theorists do not realize that such arule, far from being an example of systematic, administrativegovernment coercion, merely constitutes the recognition oftraditional property rights in the banking sector. In otherwords, theorists who endorse a fractional-reserve free-bankingsystem, which would infringe traditional legal principles,fail to see that “free trade in banking is synonymous with freetrade in swindling,” a famous phrase attributed to an anonymousAmerican <strong>and</strong> reiterated by Tooke. 102 Moreover if afree-banking system must ultimately be defended as a “lesserevil” in comparison with central banking, the motive should101 <strong>Mises</strong>, Human Action, p. 443.102 To be specific, Tooke remarked:As to the free trade in banking in the sense which it is sometimescontended for, I agree with a writer in one of the Americanpapers, who observes that free trade in banking is synonymouswith free trade in swindling. Such claims do notrest in any manner on grounds analogous to the claims offreedom of competition in production. It is a matter of regulationby the State <strong>and</strong> comes within the province of police.(Thomas Tooke, A History of Prices, 3 vols. [London: Longman,1840], vol. 3, p. 206)We agree with Tooke in that if free banking implies freedom to operatewith a fractional reserve, then essential legal principles are violated <strong>and</strong>the state, if it is to have any function at all, should diligently attempt toprevent such violations <strong>and</strong> punish them when they occur. This appearsto be precisely what <strong>Ludwig</strong> <strong>von</strong> <strong>Mises</strong> had in mind when, in HumanAction (p. 666), he quoted this excerpt of Tooke’s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!