12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

636 <strong>Money</strong>, <strong>Bank</strong> <strong>Credit</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Cycles</strong>start in the free-banking/central-banking debate, in the sensethat the argument would be meaningless if traditional legalprinciples were respected <strong>and</strong> a 100-percent reserve requirementwere reestablished for banking. Under these conditions,no harm would be done to holders of banknotes <strong>and</strong> deposits,who would always be able to withdraw their money, regardlessof the fate of their bank. <strong>The</strong>refore the paternalistic argumentthat a central bank is necessary to protect the interests ofinjured parties makes no sense. If we follow the logic of a fractional-reservebanking system, this first argument in favor ofa central bank is at least very doubtful, while in the context ofa free-banking system based on traditional legal principles<strong>and</strong> a 100-percent reserve requirement, it is completely irrelevant.<strong>The</strong> second argument expressed in favor of central banksrests on the notion that a banking system controlled by a centralbank provokes fewer economic crises than a free-bankingsystem. This argument, like the first one, represents an inappropriateapproach to the debate. We already know that thefractional-reserve free-banking system may stimulate growthin the money supply in the form of loans, <strong>and</strong> that this growthinvariably distorts the productive structure of capital goods<strong>and</strong> endogenously <strong>and</strong> repetitively triggers a reversionprocess that manifests itself as an economic recession that hitsbanks particularly hard. In fact it was the very desire to protectbanks from the effects of the repetitive crises created byfractional-reserve banking which prompted bankers themselvesto dem<strong>and</strong> the establishment of a central bank to loan themmoney as a last resort. Experience has shown that far fromdefusing economic crises, the advent of the central bank hasexacerbated them. In a fractional-reserve free-banking system(with no central bank), even though the expansionaryprocesses which provoke crises cannot be avoided, the reversionmechanisms which lead to the necessary readjustment<strong>and</strong> correction of economic errors operate much sooner <strong>and</strong>more quickly than in the central-bank-based system. Indeed theloss of public confidence is not the only factor to endanger themost expansionist banks, the reserves of which rapidly diminishas the holders of their bills withdraw their countervalue inspecie. Interbank clearing mechanisms related to deposits also

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!