12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

630 <strong>Money</strong>, <strong>Bank</strong> <strong>Credit</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Cycles</strong>encourage policies of monetary recklessness <strong>and</strong> financialexcesses much worse than those it was originally designed toprevent. 54Consequently, even though in terms of theory the <strong>Bank</strong>ingSchool was utterly defeated, in practice it ultimately triumphed.Indeed Peel’s <strong>Bank</strong> Charter Act failed because it did not prohibitthe issuance of new loans <strong>and</strong> deposits in the absence ofa 100 percent reserve. As a result, recurrent cycles of boom <strong>and</strong>recession continued, <strong>and</strong> the proposals <strong>and</strong> theories of theCurrency School underst<strong>and</strong>ably lost a tremendous amount ofprestige. <strong>The</strong>refore popular dem<strong>and</strong>s for inflationary policieswhich facilitate credit expansion, dem<strong>and</strong>s backed by the everh<strong>and</strong>y mercantilist theories of the <strong>Bank</strong>ing School, found abreeding ground in the central-bank-based system, which ultimatelybecame an essential instrument of an interventionist,planned credit <strong>and</strong> monetary policy invariably aimed at virtuallyunchecked monetary <strong>and</strong> credit expansion.Only Modeste, Cernuschi, Hübner, <strong>and</strong> Michaelis, followedby <strong>Ludwig</strong> <strong>von</strong> <strong>Mises</strong> <strong>and</strong> his much more profoundanalysis, saw that the Currency School’s recommendation ofcentral banking was mistaken <strong>and</strong> that the best, indeed theonly, way to uphold the school’s principles of sound moneywas to adopt a free banking system subject to private law (i.e.,to a 100-percent reserve requirement) <strong>and</strong> unbenefited byprivileges. However we will study this point in greater detailin the next section, in which we will examine the debatebetween supporters of free banking <strong>and</strong> those of central banking.54 We agree entirely with Pedro Schwartz when he classifies Keynes (<strong>and</strong>to a lesser extent, Marshall) as “<strong>Bank</strong>ing School” theorists who nonethelessdefended the central bank system (precisely to gain the maximum“flexibility” to exp<strong>and</strong> the money supply). See Schwartz’s article, “Elmonopolio del banco central en la historia del pensamiento económico:un siglo de miopía en Inglaterra,” pp. 685–729, esp. p. 729.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!