12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

628 <strong>Money</strong>, <strong>Bank</strong> <strong>Credit</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Cycles</strong>Currency School theorists provided a valid explanation of therecurring phases of boom <strong>and</strong> recession which plagued theBritish economy in the 1830s <strong>and</strong> 1840s: the booms had theirroots in credit expansion which the <strong>Bank</strong> of Engl<strong>and</strong> initiated<strong>and</strong> the other British banks continued. Gold systematicallyflowed out of the United Kingdom whenever her trading partnerseither did not engage in credit expansion or did so at aslower pace than Britain, where the fractional-reserve bankingsystem was comparatively more developed. Each of the arguments<strong>Bank</strong>ing School theorists devised in their attempt torefute the Currency School’s central idea (i.e., that the outflowof gold <strong>and</strong> cash from Great Britain was the inevitable consequenceof domestic credit expansion) failed miserably. Howeverdefenders of the Currency School position made threeserious mistakes which in the long run proved fatal. First, theyfailed to realize that bank deposits play exactly the same roleas banknotes unbacked by specie. Second, they were unable tocombine their sound monetary theory with a complete explanationof the trade cycle. <strong>The</strong>y merely scratched the surface ofthe problem, <strong>and</strong>, lacking an adequate theory of capital, wereunable to perceive that bank credit expansion exerts a negativeinfluence on the different capital-goods stages in anation’s productive structure. <strong>The</strong>y did not analyze in detailthe existing relationship between variations in the money supply<strong>and</strong> the market rate of interest, <strong>and</strong> thus they implicitlyrelied on the naive, mistaken assumption that money could beThinking. In particular we must cite the following: Samuel Jones Lloyd(Lord Overstone), Reflections Suggested by a Perusal of Mr. J. HorseleyPalmer’s Pamphlet on the Causes <strong>and</strong> Consequences of the Pressure on the<strong>Money</strong> Market (London: P. Richardson 1837); later reprinted by J.R.McCulloch in his Tracts <strong>and</strong> Other Publications on Metallic <strong>and</strong> Paper Currency,by the Right Hon. Lord Overstone (London: Harrison <strong>and</strong> Sons1857). Also George Warde Norman, Remarks upon some Prevalent Errorswith respect to Currency <strong>and</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>ing, <strong>and</strong> Suggestions to the Legislature <strong>and</strong>the Public as to the Improvement in the Monetary System (London: P.Richardson 1838); <strong>and</strong> especially Robert Torrens (perhaps the finest CurrencySchool theorist), A Letter to the Right Hon. Lord Viscount Melbourne,on the Causes of the Recent Derangement in the <strong>Money</strong> Market, <strong>and</strong> on <strong>Bank</strong>Reform (London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown <strong>and</strong> Green, 1837).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!