12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

566 <strong>Money</strong>, <strong>Bank</strong> <strong>Credit</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Cycles</strong>We know that according to the accelerator principle, anincrease in the dem<strong>and</strong> for consumer goods <strong>and</strong> servicesbrings about tremendously magnified growth in the dem<strong>and</strong>for capital goods. However the principle also implies that ifthe dem<strong>and</strong> for capital goods is to remain constant, thedem<strong>and</strong> for consumer goods <strong>and</strong> services will have to continueto rise at a progressively increasing rate. This is due tothe fact that a steady dem<strong>and</strong> for consumer goods <strong>and</strong> services,i.e., a dem<strong>and</strong> which does not increase, will provoke amarked contraction in the dem<strong>and</strong> for equipment goods. <strong>The</strong>dem<strong>and</strong> for these goods will return to the level necessaryfor replacements only. <strong>The</strong> accelerator principle clearly <strong>and</strong>perfectly fits the Keynesian prescriptions of an unlimitedexpansion of consumption <strong>and</strong> aggregate dem<strong>and</strong>: indeed,the accelerator doctrine indicates that any rise in consumptioncauses a huge upsurge in investment, <strong>and</strong> that saving is of noimportance! Thus the accelerator principle acts as a false substitutefor the capital theory the Keynesian model lacks; iteases the theoretical conscience of Keynesians, <strong>and</strong> it reinforcestheir belief that voluntary saving is counterproductive<strong>and</strong> unnecessary for economic development (the “paradox ofyearly sales of cloth. Thus, when its sales have remained at$30 million per year for some time, its balance sheet will show$60 million of capital equipment, consisting of perhaps 20machines of different ages, with 1 wearing out each year <strong>and</strong>being replaced. Because replacement just balances depreciation,there is no net investment or saving being done by thecorporation. Gross investment takes place at the rate of $3 millionper year, representing the yearly replacement of 1machine. . . . Now let us suppose that, in the fourth year, salesrise 50 per cent—from $30 to $45 million. <strong>The</strong>n the number ofmachines must also rise 50 per cent, or from 20 to 30machines. In that fourth year, instead of 1 machine, 11machines must be bought—10 new ones in addition to thereplacement of the worn-out one. Sales rose 50 per cent. Howmuch has machine production gone up? From 1 machine to11; or by 1,000 percent! (Samuelson, <strong>Economic</strong>s, 11th ed. [NewYork: McGraw-Hill, 1980], pp. 246–47)Interestingly, the analysis of the accelerator principle was eliminatedfrom the 15th edition of the book, published in 1992.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!