12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Critique of Monetarist <strong>and</strong> Keynesian <strong>The</strong>ories 565CRITICISM OF THE “ACCELERATOR” PRINCIPLEOur theory on the impact of credit expansion on the structureof production rests on a capital theory we examined indetail in chapter 5. According to this theory, a healthy, permanent“lengthening” of the productive structure is contingenton a prior increase in saving. <strong>The</strong>refore we must criticize theso-called “accelerator principle,” developed by the KeynesianSchool. Those who accept this principle assert that anyincrease in consumption leads to a more-than-proportionalincrease in investment, which is contrary to what our theorysuggests.In fact, according to the accelerator principle, a rise in thedem<strong>and</strong> for consumer goods <strong>and</strong> services provokes an exaggeratedupsurge in the dem<strong>and</strong> for capital goods. <strong>The</strong> argumentcenters around the notion that a fixed relationship existsbetween the output of consumer goods <strong>and</strong> the number ofmachines necessary to produce them. Thus any rise in thedem<strong>and</strong> for consumer goods <strong>and</strong> services causes a proportionalincrease in the number of machines necessary to producethem. When we compare this new number with that normallydem<strong>and</strong>ed to compensate for the customary depreciation ofthe machines, we see an upturn in the dem<strong>and</strong> for capitalgoods which is far more than proportional to the rise in thedem<strong>and</strong> for consumer goods <strong>and</strong> services. 80on the specific circumstances of the 1930s. Today so-called “new Keynesianmacroeconomists” (Stiglitz, Shapiro, Summers, Romer, etc.) focuson the analysis of the real <strong>and</strong> monetary rigidities they observe in themarket. However they still do not underst<strong>and</strong> that such rigidities <strong>and</strong>their chief effects appear <strong>and</strong> worsen precisely as a result of creditexpansion <strong>and</strong> government intervention, nor do they recognize that certainspontaneous, microeconomic forces exist in the market which, inthe absence of government intervention, tend to reverse, coordinate,<strong>and</strong> resolve maladjustments by a process of crisis, recession, <strong>and</strong> recovery.On the new Keynesians, see also upcoming footnote 94.80 Samuelson provides the following example to illustrate the acceleratorprinciple:Imagine a typical textile firm whose stock of capital equipmentis always kept equal to about 2 times the value of its

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!