12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

564 <strong>Money</strong>, <strong>Bank</strong> <strong>Credit</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Cycles</strong>In fact Keynesian remedies which consist of increasingeffective dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> credit expansion do not begin to relieveunemployment. Instead they inevitably worsen it, as theyresult in a poor allocation of jobs <strong>and</strong> factors of productionthroughout a series of productive stages which consumers donot wish to maintain. 79told that, “since in the long run we are all dead,” policy shouldbe guided entirely by short-run considerations? I fear that thesebelievers in the principle of après nous le déluge may get whatthey have bargained for sooner than they wish. (p. 410)79 Hayek’s main objection to macroeconomics (both Keynesian <strong>and</strong>monetarist versions) is that macroeconomists work with macroaggregates<strong>and</strong> thus do not take into account the harmful microeconomiceffects of credit expansion, which as we have seen, leads to the malinvestmentof resources <strong>and</strong> ultimately, to crisis <strong>and</strong> unemployment.Moreover, as Keynesians assume excess availability of all factors exists(due to idle capacity <strong>and</strong> unemployment of resources), they tend to ignorethe price system, the functioning of which they consider unnecessary. <strong>The</strong> pricesystem is therefore rendered a vague, incomprehensible redundancy. To theextent that all is determined by macroaggregate functions, the traditionalmicroeconomic theory of relative-price determination <strong>and</strong> thetheory of capital, interest <strong>and</strong> distribution, which are the backbone ofeconomic theory, become unintelligible. Unfortunately, as Hayek pointsout, an entire generation of economists have learned nothing other thanKeynesian [<strong>and</strong> monetarist] macroeconomics (“I fear the theory willstill give us a lot of trouble: it has left us with a lost generation of economistswho have learnt nothing else,” F.A. Hayek, “<strong>The</strong> Campaignagainst Keynesian Inflation,” in New Studies, p. 221). Hayek believesKeynes was aware he had developed a weak theoretical framework.Hayek indicates that the last time he saw Keynes prior to his death, heasked him if he was becoming alarmed at the poor use most of his discipleswere making of his theories:His reply was that these theories had been greatly needed inthe 1930s; but if these theories should ever become harmful, Icould be assured that he would quickly bring about a changein public opinion. (Hayek, “Personal Recollections of Keynes<strong>and</strong> the Keynesian Revolution,” p. 287)Hayek states that Keynes died two weeks later without ever having thechance to alter the course of events. Hayek criticizes him for giving thename “general theory” to an erroneous conceptual framework which, asits own author eventually recognized, had been conceived ad hoc based

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!