12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Critique of Monetarist <strong>and</strong> Keynesian <strong>The</strong>ories 543certain significant peculiarities of Keynesian thought warrantdiscussion.Before we begin, however, let us remember that Keynespossessed only a very limited knowledge of economics in general,<strong>and</strong> of the market processes of entrepreneurial coordinationin particular. According to F.A. Hayek, Keynes’s theoreticalbackground was limited almost exclusively to the work ofAlfred Marshall, <strong>and</strong> he was unable to underst<strong>and</strong> economicsbooks written in foreign languages (with the possible exceptionof those in French). Hayek wrote:obvious in Keynes’s book, <strong>The</strong> General <strong>The</strong>ory, that his macroeconomictheory of prices is simply a variant of the monetarist conception. In hisbook Keynes makes the following explicit assertion:<strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>ory of Prices, that is to say, the analysis of the relationbetween changes in the quantity of money <strong>and</strong> changes in theprice-level with a view to determining the elasticity of pricesin response to changes in the quantity of money, must, therefore,direct itself to the five complicating factors set forthabove. (Keynes, <strong>The</strong> General <strong>The</strong>ory, pp. 296–97; italics areadded)<strong>The</strong> best modern exposition of Keynes’s theoretical framework is that ofRoger Garrison (Time <strong>and</strong> <strong>Money</strong>, chaps. 7–9), who shows that Keyneswas ultimately a socialist who did not believe in free markets for investment.Keynes himself acknowledged this fact when he wrote that histheories were “more easily adapted to the conditions of a totalitarianstate” (Collected Writings [London: Macmillan, 1973], vol. 7, p. xxvi).This statement appears in the prologue (which Keynes wrote on September7, 1936) to the German edition of <strong>The</strong> General <strong>The</strong>ory. <strong>The</strong> exactwords follow:Trotzdem kann die <strong>The</strong>orie der Produktion als Ganzes, dieden Zweck des folgenden Buches bildet, viel leichter denVerhältnissen eines totalen Staates angepasst werden als die<strong>The</strong>orie der Erzeugung und Verteilung einer gegebenen,unter Bedingungen des freien Wettbewerbes und einesgrossen Masses <strong>von</strong> Laissez-faire erstellten Produktion. (SeeJohn Maynard Keynes, Allgemeine <strong>The</strong>orie der Beschäftigung,des Zinses und des Geldes [Berlin: Dunker <strong>and</strong> Humblot, 1936<strong>and</strong> 1994], p. ix)Footnote 76 of this chapter contains Keynes’s explicit acknowledgementof his lack of an adequate theory of capital.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!