12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Critique of Monetarist <strong>and</strong> Keynesian <strong>The</strong>ories 535the purchasing power of money, this action would trigger <strong>and</strong>intensify all of the processes which inexorably lead to investmenterrors <strong>and</strong> crisis, <strong>and</strong> which monetarists are incapable ofunderst<strong>and</strong>ing, due to the obvious deficiencies in the macroeconomicanalytical tools they use. 38A BRIEF NOTEONTHETHEORY OF RATIONAL EXPECTATIONS<strong>The</strong> analysis carried out here can also be applied to makesome comments on both the hypothesis of rational expectations<strong>and</strong> other contributions of new classical economics.According to the hypothesis of rational expectations, economicagents tend to make correct predictions based on anappropriate use of all relevant information <strong>and</strong> on scientificknowledge made available by economic theory. Those whoaccept this hypothesis argue that government attempts toinfluence production <strong>and</strong> employment through monetary <strong>and</strong>fiscal policy are fruitless. Supporters therefore hold that, to theextent that economic agents foresee the consequences of traditionalpolicies, these policies are ineffective in influencing realproduction or employment. 39Nevertheless there are serious flaws in the economic logicof these analytical developments in new classical economics.On the one h<strong>and</strong>, we must take into account that economicagents cannot possibly obtain all of the relevant information,both with respect to the particular circumstances of the currentcycle (practical knowledge), <strong>and</strong> with respect to whicheconomic theory best explains the course of events (scientificknowledge). This is due, among other factors, to a lack ofunanimity as to which theory of cycles is the most valid:though the arguments presented here indicate that the correctexplanation is the one provided by the Austrian theory of thebusiness cycle, as long as the scientific community as a wholefails to accept it, we cannot expect all other economic agents38 See section 9 of chapter 6 (pp. 424–31), which covered the harmfuleffects of policies to stabilize the purchasing power of money.39 See the explanation on the evolution of the school of rational expectationsin Garrison, Time <strong>and</strong> <strong>Money</strong>, chap. 2, pp. 15–30.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!