12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Critique of Monetarist <strong>and</strong> Keynesian <strong>The</strong>ories 527price level, fluctuations in credit constitute a “revolution”which affects all relative prices <strong>and</strong> eventually provokes a crisisof malinvestment <strong>and</strong> an economic recession. <strong>The</strong> inabilityto perceive this fact led the American economist Benjamin M.Anderson to assert that the fundamental flaw in the quantitytheory of money is merely that it conceals from the researcherthe underlying microeconomic phenomena influenced byvariations in the general price level. Indeed monetarists contentthemselves with the quantity theory’s equation ofexchange, deeming all important issues to be adequatelyaddressed by it <strong>and</strong> subsequent microeconomic analyses to beunnecessary. 25<strong>The</strong> above sheds light on monetarists’ lack of a satisfactorytheory of economic cycles <strong>and</strong> on their belief that crises <strong>and</strong>depressions are caused merely by a “monetary contraction.”This is a naive <strong>and</strong> superficial diagnosis which confuses thecause with the effect. As we know, economic crises arisebecause credit expansion <strong>and</strong> inflation first distort the productivestructure through a complex process which later manifestsitself in a crisis, monetary squeeze, <strong>and</strong> recession.Attributing crises to a monetary contraction is like attributingmeasles to the fever <strong>and</strong> rash which accompany it. This explanationof cycles can only be upheld by the scientistic, ultraempiricalmethodology of monetarist macroeconomics, anapproach which lacks a temporal theory of capital. 2625 <strong>The</strong> formula of the quantity theorists is a monotonous “tit-tattoe”—money,credit, <strong>and</strong> prices. With this explanation theproblem was solved <strong>and</strong> further research <strong>and</strong> further investigationwere unnecessary, <strong>and</strong> consequently stopped—forthose who believed in this theory. It is one of the great vicesof the quantity theory of money that it tends to check investigationfor underlying factors in a business situation.Anderson concludes:<strong>The</strong> quantity theory of money is invalid. . . . We cannot accepta predominantly monetary general theory either for the levelof commodity prices or for the movements of the businesscycle. (Anderson, <strong>Economic</strong>s <strong>and</strong> the Public Welfare, pp. 70–71)26 <strong>The</strong> Spanish monetarist Pedro Schwartz once stated:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!