12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Critique of Monetarist <strong>and</strong> Keynesian <strong>The</strong>ories 523Supposing the “velocity of circulation” of money remainsrelatively constant over time, <strong>and</strong> the gross national productapproximates that of “full employment,” monetarists believemoney is neutral in the long run, <strong>and</strong> that therefore an expansionof the money supply (M) tends to proportionally raise thecorresponding general price level. In other words, though innominal terms the different factor incomes <strong>and</strong> production<strong>and</strong> consumption prices may increase by the same percentageas the money supply, in real terms they remain the same overtime. Hence monetarists believe inflation is a monetary phenomenonthat affects all economic sectors uniformly <strong>and</strong> proportionally,<strong>and</strong> that therefore it does not disrupt or discoordinatethe structure of productive stages. It is clear that themonetarist viewpoint is purely “macroeconomic” <strong>and</strong> ignoresthe microeconomic effects of monetary growth on the productivestructure. As we saw in the last section, this approachstems from the lack of a capital theory which takes the timefactor into account.Relation to <strong>Credit</strong> Interest <strong>and</strong> Crises [New York: Macmillan, 1911 <strong>and</strong>1925], p. 48 in the 1925 edition), the left side of the equation can also beseparated out into two parts, MV <strong>and</strong> M’V’, where M’ <strong>and</strong> V’ denoterespectively the supply <strong>and</strong> velocity of money with respect to bankdeposits:MV + M’V’ = PTA national income version of the equation of exchange has also beenproposed. In this case T represents a “real” national income measure(for example, the “real” gross national product), which, as we know,only includes consumer goods <strong>and</strong> services <strong>and</strong> final capital goods (see,for instance, Samuelson <strong>and</strong> Nordhaus, <strong>Economic</strong>s). This version is particularlyfaulty, since it excludes all products of intermediate stages inthe productive structure, products which are also exchanged in units of themoney stock, M. Thus the equation more than halves the true, real valueof T which MV supposedly influences. Finally, the Cambridge cash balanceversion is as follows:M = kPTwhere M is the stock of money (though it can also be interpreted as thedesired cash balance) <strong>and</strong> PT is a measure of national income. See MiltonFriedman, “Quantity <strong>The</strong>ory of <strong>Money</strong>,” in <strong>The</strong> New Palgrave: A Dictionaryof <strong>Economic</strong>s, vol. 4, esp. pp. 4–7.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!