12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Additional Considerations on the <strong>The</strong>ory of the Business Cycle 479explanation, which is rejected because there is no sufficientquantitative evidence for it. 81While taking the above warnings <strong>and</strong> considerations intoaccount, in this section we will see that the available historicaldata concerning past cycles of boom <strong>and</strong> recession fits inexcellently with our theory of the cycle. In addition at the endof this section we will review the studies conducted to empiricallytest the Austrian theory of the business cycle.BUSINESS CYCLES PRIOR TO THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION(a) It would be impossible to cover here (even in condensedform) all cycles of boom <strong>and</strong> recession whichaffected the world’s economies prior to the IndustrialRevolution. Nevertheless we are fortunate enough tohave available to us a growing number of works oneconomic history which greatly facilitate the applicationof the theory of the business cycle to specific economicevents from the past. We could begin by mentioningCarlo M. Cipolla’s works on the crises whichgripped the Florentine economy in the mid-fourteenthcentury <strong>and</strong> in the sixteenth century, crises wecovered in chapter 2. 82 Indeed we saw that Cipolla,81 Hayek made these important observations regarding the difficulty ofempirically testing economic theories, particularly the theory of thecycle, in the acceptance speech he made on receiving the Nobel PrizeDecember 11, 1974. See his article, “<strong>The</strong> Pretence of Knowledge,” <strong>The</strong>American <strong>Economic</strong> Review (December 1989): 3. Hayek concludes in thesame place:[W]hat is probably the true cause of extensive unemploymenthas been disregarded by the scientistically minded majorityof economists, because its operation could not be confirmedby directly observable relations between measurable magnitudes,<strong>and</strong> that an almost exclusive concentration on quantitativelymeasurable surface phenomena has produced a policywhich has made matters worse. (p. 5)82 Carlo M. Cipolla, <strong>The</strong> Monetary Policy of Fourteenth-Century Florence(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982); <strong>and</strong> <strong>Money</strong> in Sixteenth-Century Florence (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!