12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Additional Considerations on the <strong>The</strong>ory of the Business Cycle 447This whole process of deliberate deflation contributesnothing <strong>and</strong> merely subjects the economic system tounnecessary pressure. Regrettably, politicians’ lack oftheoretical knowledge has led them on various historicaloccasions to deliberately initiate such a process. 4646 <strong>The</strong> most typical examples of deflation deliberately initiated by governmentsare found in the United Kingdom: first, following theNapoleonic wars, <strong>and</strong> then, as mentioned above, under the auspices ofWinston Churchill in 1925 when, despite the tremendous inflationwhich affected pound sterling notes in World War I, he decided torestore the currency’s prewar parity with gold. In short Churchill blatantlydisregarded the advice Ricardo had given 100 years earlier in avery similar situation, following the Napoleonic wars: “I should neveradvise a government to restore a currency which had been depreciated30 per cent to par.” Letter from David Ricardo to John Wheatley, datedSeptember 18, 1821, <strong>The</strong> Works of David Ricardo, Piero Sraffa, ed. (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1952), vol. 9, p. 73. <strong>Ludwig</strong> <strong>von</strong><strong>Mises</strong>, in reference to these two historical cases, states:<strong>The</strong> outst<strong>and</strong>ing examples were provided by Great Britain’sreturn, both after the wartime inflation of the Napoleonicwars <strong>and</strong> after that of the first World War, to the prewar goldparity of the sterling. In each case Parliament <strong>and</strong> Cabinetadopted the deflationist policy without having weighed thepros <strong>and</strong> cons of the two methods open for a return to thegold st<strong>and</strong>ard. In the second decade of the nineteenth centurythey could be exonerated, as at that time monetary theory hadnot yet clarified the problems involved. More than a hundredyears later it was simply a display of inexcusable ignorance ofeconomics as well as of monetary history. (<strong>Mises</strong>, HumanAction, pp. 567–68 <strong>and</strong> also p. 784)F.A. Hayek points out the grave error of returning to the pre-World War Iparity between gold <strong>and</strong> the pound <strong>and</strong> also mentions that this policywas implemented slowly <strong>and</strong> gradually, instead of in the form of a rapidshock, as took place in the United States between 1920 <strong>and</strong> 1921. Hayekconcludes:Though the clear determination of the government to restorethe gold st<strong>and</strong>ard made it possible to do so as early as 1925,internal prices <strong>and</strong> wages were then still far from beingadapted to the international level. To maintain this parity, aslow <strong>and</strong> highly painful process of deflation was initiated,bringing lasting <strong>and</strong> extensive unemployment, to be ab<strong>and</strong>onedonly when it became intolerable when intensified by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!