12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

404 <strong>Money</strong>, <strong>Bank</strong> <strong>Credit</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Cycles</strong>(c) Finally let us suppose that the banking system at notime reduces the rate at which it accelerates creditexpansion, <strong>and</strong> instead does just the opposite: it constantly<strong>and</strong> progressively intensifies it, with the purposeof quashing any symptom of an emergingdepression. In this case, the moment economic agentsbegin to realize that the rate of inflation is certain tocontinue growing, a widespread flight toward realvalues will commence, along with an astronomicaljump in the prices of goods <strong>and</strong> services, <strong>and</strong> finally,the collapse of the monetary system, an event whichIn 1969 Hayek again used this analogy in his article, “Three Elucidationsof the Ricardo Effect,” in which he reiterates that the distortingeffect of credit expansion on the productive structure must continue aslong as banks create new money <strong>and</strong> this money enters the economicsystem at certain points at a progressively increasing rate. Hayek criticizesHicks for assuming the inflationary shock will “uniformly” affectthe entire productive structure, <strong>and</strong> he demonstrates that if creditexpansion escalates at a rate exceeding the rise in prices, this process“can evidently go on indefinitely, at least as long as we neglect changesin the manner in which expectations concerning future prices areformed.” He concludes:I find it useful to illustrate the general relationship by an analogywhich seems worth stating here, though Sir John [Hicks](in correspondence) did not find it helpful. <strong>The</strong> effect we arediscussing is rather similar to that which appears when wepour a viscous liquid, such as honey, into a vessel. <strong>The</strong>re will,of course, be a tendency for it to spread to an even surface. Butif the stream hits the surface at one point, a little mound willform there from which the additional matter will slowly spreadoutward. Even after we have stopped pouring in more, it willtake some time until the even surface will be fully restored. Itwill, of course, not reach the height which the top of the moundhad reached when the inflow stopped. But as long as we pourat a constant rate, the mound will preserve its height relative tothe surrounding pool—providing a very literal illustration ofwhat I called before a fluid equilibrium. (Hayek, New Studies inPhilosophy, Politics, <strong>Economic</strong>s <strong>and</strong> the History of Ideas, pp.171–73)On the important role of expectations in this entire process, see especiallyGarrison, Time <strong>and</strong> <strong>Money</strong>, chaps. 1–4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!