12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Bank</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> Expansion <strong>and</strong> Its Effects on the <strong>Economic</strong> System 353consumers continue to consume at a steady (or evenincreased) pace <strong>and</strong> do not worry about stepping up their saving.69To illustrate the initial effect credit expansion exerts on thereal productive structure, we will follow the system used inthe last section to present several graphs <strong>and</strong> tables whichreflect the impact of credit expansion on the productive structure.A word of caution is necessary, however: it is practicallyimpossible to represent in this way the complex effects producedin the market when credit expansion triggers the generalizedprocess of discoordination we are describing. <strong>The</strong>reforeit is important to exercise great care in interpreting thefollowing tables <strong>and</strong> charts, which should only be valuedinsofar as they illustrate <strong>and</strong> facilitate underst<strong>and</strong>ing of thefundamental economic argument. It is nearly impossible toreflect with charts anything other than strictly static situations,since charts invariably conceal the dynamic processes whichtake place between situations. Nonetheless the tables <strong>and</strong>graphs we propose to represent the stages in the productivestructure may well help illustrate the essential theoretical argument<strong>and</strong> greatly facilitate an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of it. 7069 Roger Garrison interprets this phenomenon as an unsustainabledeparture from the production possibilities frontier (PPF). See his book,Time <strong>and</strong> <strong>Money</strong>, pp. 67–76.70 Our intention is to warn readers of the error which threatens anyonewho might attempt to make a strictly theoretical interpretation of thecharts we present. Nicholas Kaldor committed such an error in his criticalanalysis of Hayek’s theory, as was revealed by Laurence S. Moss <strong>and</strong>Karen I. Vaughn, for whomthe problem is not to learn about adjustments by comparingstates of equilibrium but rather to ask if the conditionsremaining at T1 make the transition to T2 at all possible.Kaldor’s approach indeed assumed away the very problemthat Hayek’s theory was designed to analyze, the problem ofthe transition an economy undergoes in moving from onecoordinated capital structure to another.See their article, “Hayek’s Ricardo Effect: A Second Look,” p. 564. <strong>The</strong>articles in which Kaldor criticizes Hayek are “Capital Intensity <strong>and</strong> theTrade Cycle,” <strong>Economic</strong>a (February 1939): 40–66; <strong>and</strong> “Professor Hayek

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!