12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

346 <strong>Money</strong>, <strong>Bank</strong> <strong>Credit</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Cycles</strong>never reaches the level of growth undergone by monetaryprices of consumer goods <strong>and</strong> services.According to John Hicks, Giovanni Boccaccio, in an interestingpassage in the Introduction to Decameron, writtenaround the year 1360, was the first to describe, in rather preciseterms, a process very similar to the one we have just analyzedwhen he related the impact the Great Plague of the fourteenthcentury had on the people of Florence. In fact theepidemic caused people to anticipate a drastic reduction in lifeexpectancy, <strong>and</strong> thus entrepreneurs <strong>and</strong> workers, instead ofsaving <strong>and</strong> “lengthening” the stages in their production processby working their l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> tending their livestock, devotedthemselves to increasing their present consumption. 60 AfterBoccaccio, the first economist to seriously consider the effectsof a decline in saving <strong>and</strong> the resulting economic setback wasBöhm-Bawerk in his book, Capital <strong>and</strong> Interest, 61 where heexplains in detail that a general decision by individuals to consumemore <strong>and</strong> save less triggers a phenomenon of capitalconsumption, which ultimately lowers productive capacity<strong>and</strong> the production of consumer goods <strong>and</strong> services, givingrise to the generalized impoverishment of society. 6260 In the words of John Hicks himself:Boccaccio is describing the impact on people’s minds of theGreat Plague at Florence, the expectation that they had notlong to live. “Instead of furthering the future products of theircattle <strong>and</strong> their l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> their own past labour, they devotedall their attention to the consumption of present goods.” [JohnHicks asks:] “Why does Boccaccio write like Böhm-Bawerk?<strong>The</strong> reason is surely that he was trained as a merchant.”(Hicks, Capital <strong>and</strong> Time: A Neo-Austrian <strong>The</strong>ory, pp. 12–13)61 Böhm-Bawerk, Capital <strong>and</strong> Interest, vol. 2: <strong>The</strong> Positive <strong>The</strong>ory of Capital,pp. 113–14. At the end of this analysis, Böhm-Bawerk concludes thatsaving is the necessary prior condition for the formation of capital. Inthe words of Böhm-Bawerk himself: “Ersparung [ist] eine unentbehrlicheBedingung der Kapitalbildung” (Böhm-Bawerk, German edition,p. 134).62 Fritz Machlup clearly exposed the error committed by the theorists ofthe paradox of thrift when he made reference to the concrete historicalcase of the Austrian economy after World War I. At that time everything

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!