12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

318 <strong>Money</strong>, <strong>Bank</strong> <strong>Credit</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Cycles</strong>For analytical purposes we will begin by considering anextreme situation which nevertheless will be of great assistancein graphically illustrating <strong>and</strong> better underst<strong>and</strong>ing theprocesses involved. We will suppose that economic agentssuddenly decide to save 25 percent of their net income. Ourstarting point will be the clear, numerical example of the lastsection, in which we assumed net income was equal to 100m.u., which corresponded to the original means of production<strong>and</strong> the interest capitalists received, <strong>and</strong> which was spententirely on consumer goods. We will now suppose that, as aresult of a fall in time preference, economic agents decide torelinquish 25 percent (i.e., one-fourth) of their consumption<strong>and</strong> to save the corresponding resources, offering this excessof present goods to potential dem<strong>and</strong>ers of them. Three effectssimultaneously follow from this increase in voluntary saving.Given their great importance, we will now consider them separately.44of thrift,” this concept follows when Keynes’s economic principles arecarried to their “logical” conclusion:If governments should increase their spending during recessions,why should not households? If there were no principlesof “sound finance” for public finance, from where wouldsuch principles come for family finance? Eat, drink <strong>and</strong> bemerry, for in the long-run all are dead. (Clifford F. Thies, “<strong>The</strong>Paradox of Thrift: RIP,” Cato Journal 16, no. 1 [Spring–Summer,1996]: 125)See also our comments in footnote 58 on the treatment this subjectreceives in different editions of Samuelson’s textbook.44 Following Turgot, Eugen <strong>von</strong> Böhm-Bawerk was the first to confront<strong>and</strong> resolve this issue. His analysis was rudimentary, yet contained allthe essential elements of a definitive explanation. It is found in volume2 of his magnum opus, Capital <strong>and</strong> Interest, published in 1889 (Kapital undKapitalzins: Positive <strong>The</strong>orie des Kapitales, pp. 124–25). Due to its significance,we include here the passage from Capital <strong>and</strong> Interest in whichBöhm-Bawerk poses the question of growth in voluntary saving in amarket economy <strong>and</strong> the forces involved which lead to a lengthening ofthe productive structure: let us suppose, says Böhm-Bawerk, thateach individual consumes, on the average, only three-quartersof his income <strong>and</strong> saves the other quarter, then obviouslythere will be a falling off in the desire to buy consumptiongoods <strong>and</strong> in the dem<strong>and</strong> for them. Only three-quarters as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!