12.07.2015 Views

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles - The Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

304 <strong>Money</strong>, <strong>Bank</strong> <strong>Credit</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Cycles</strong>7. Gross <strong>and</strong> net income for the year.Seventh, we could view Chart V-1, our outline of the differentstages in the production process, as an illustration of theflow of both capital goods <strong>and</strong> money. Indeed capital goods“flow downward,” i.e., from the stages furthest from consumptionto the stages closest to it, <strong>and</strong> money “flows” in theopposite direction. In other words, m.u. are first used to payfor final consumer goods, <strong>and</strong> from that point they graduallymove up the scale of productive stages until they reach thosestages furthest from consumption. <strong>The</strong>refore to obtain thegross monetary income for the period, we total, from bottomto top, all of the transactions (in terms of m.u.) conducted duringthe period. Details appear in Table V-2.We see from this table that the gross income for the periodis equal to 370 m.u. Of this amount, 100 m.u. correspond to netincome, which is spent entirely on final consumer goods; <strong>and</strong>270 m.u. correspond to the total supply of present goods orgross saving, which coincides with the total gross dem<strong>and</strong> forpresent goods during the period. <strong>The</strong> following relationshipexists between gross income <strong>and</strong> net income for the period,according to the calculation made in Table V-2: gross incomeis equal to 3.7 times the net income for the period. That is, arelationship exists between the number of m.u. spent on consumergoods <strong>and</strong> the much larger number spent on capitalgoods. This proportion is represented in Chart V-1 by thehe first recorded for each stage of production the value in “years oflabor” of the products of the corresponding stage). Later, in 1929, F.A.Hayek performed the same task with greater precision in his article“Gibt es einen ‘Widersinn des Sparens’?” (Zeitschrift Für Nationalökonomie,Bd. 1, Heft 3, 1929), which was translated with the title “<strong>The</strong>‘Paradox’ of Saving” <strong>and</strong> published in English in <strong>Economic</strong>a (May 1931)<strong>and</strong> later included as an appendix to the book, Profits, Interest <strong>and</strong> Investment<strong>and</strong> Other Essays on the <strong>The</strong>ory of Industrial Fluctuations, 1st ed. (London:George Routledge <strong>and</strong> Sons, 1939 <strong>and</strong> Clifton, N.J.: Augustus M.Kelley, Clifton 1975), pp. 199–263, esp. pp. 229–31. As Hayek himselfadmits, it was precisely the desire to simplify the awkward presentationof these tables that led him to introduce the chart of production stageswe have displayed in Chart V-1 (see Prices <strong>and</strong> Production, p. 38, note 1).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!