Larry-Maurer-Intervi.. - American Antigravity

AAG: Overall, how much electricity will thistrain take -- I'm wondering about the efficiency ofyour design, and what kind of power it will takecompared to a traditional MagLev design?Maurer: This will take a large power plant.One much like the standard maglev design calls for,which was originally designed by John Joanopolisat MIT in 1984. (See 1973 Scientific AmericanMagazine article “Electromagnetic Flight”). Wehave yet to implement a MagLev here in the U.S.but perhaps for good reason. Our “trackless” designis by far superior and is basically a super-design ofthe same concept.AAG: Given the cost of the starship design, I'mworried about the pricetag for the train. Is lowercost a selling point - I mean, at least in terms ofdemonstrating the technology on a smaller scale tolater sell the starship project as an extension ofrelated technology?FE-Dynamics: The laser field & craftsimulate a large, single quantum-particle.Maurer: As in most cases the first prototype model is always expensive. However, once thevehicles and system are being built by popular demand then they will last for many years withelectro-polishing techniques to maintain the vehicle’s conductive charge, etc. Even the first chipcost over a $million now what are they 19 cents?AAG: Now you've had a patent on the starship for a long time, and I understand that you'vejust received a patent on the train technology as well. Can you tell us a bit about the patentsyou've obtained, and the process you went through to get them? Was it pretty straightforward,or does the revolutionary nature of these technologies make them harder to get through thepatent-office?QM Wormholes: Instantaneous travel viaquantum-tunneling through interstellar spaceMaurer: Our patent process was fairlystraight forward, however because of having ten(10) claims, and the lengthy description it did costus much for the fee and annual maintenance fees.The Japanese patent took us eight (8) years whilethe American patent took us only two (2) years. TheJapanese are much more thorough in their patentprocess and actually publish the patent for anydispute to the claim from the general public beforethey grant the patent. Our American Patent The“Acousto-Electromagnetic Hologistic ResonantSystem”, No. 4,817,102 and our Japanese patent no.1,864,717 has expired. That is why we are at aquandary with acquiring our new patent which wehave made several changes and modifications on.According to our patent attorneys, who say thepatent office say we cannot discuss these changesAmerican Antigravity.Com Page 9 of 11