searchable PDF - Association for Mexican Cave Studies

searchable PDF - Association for Mexican Cave Studies searchable PDF - Association for Mexican Cave Studies

amcs.pubs.org
from amcs.pubs.org More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

54AMCS Bulletin 12 — Chapter 4Closing RemarksFigure 4.1.18. Map of Actun Toh and associated surfacestructures.three lots (table 4.1.16). A total of 127 sherds werecollected from the treads of the stairway (SJ2O7-2). Istrongly suspect that this material tumbled into operation7 from the collapsing northern edge of the floor.In other words, these sherds were likely at one timedeposited as sub-floor construction fill. This was mostdefinitely the case with SJ2O7-1, which is characterizedby a steep flow of sherd-bearing fill that hasspilled out of the exposed sub-floor ballast. It is alsolocated beneath the section of the sub-floor that wasprofiled and collected (see figure 4.1.17 and table4.1.5). The ceramics in SJ2O7-2/1 were extracted frombeneath one of the steps and include sherds from theDzudzuquil and Sierra groups. Although MiddlePreclassic material is consistently associated with thesub-floor construction fill, it can be stated with somecertainty that the consolidation of the sub-floor fill aswell as the construction of the stairway into operation7, took place during a later period.Although the complexity of Actun Toh stands outamong other caves in the survey, it shares with themcertain distinct similarities. Notable modifications ofthe cave’s interior demonstrate the importance placedon the small (and seemingly insignificant) pool thatonce provided access to the water table. An establishedcircuit within the cave directed attention towards naturallyor artificially enclosed or delineated spaces. Inthe case of Actun Toh, the extraction of a sascab-likematerial was particularly valued. Points along thiscircuit were marked by offerings, while the paths themselveswere further designated as specialized routesby sherds scattered along them. The spatial organizationof Actun Toh is developed in more detail in thefinal chapter of the dissertation.The ceramic collection from Actun Toh attests toits long use history. A quantitative assessment of representedceramic groups suggests a strong LatePreclassic to Early Classic component. The fact thatno whole vessels were found within the cave can likelybe attributed to looting activities. It is unclear whetheror not each sherd in the cave’s diverse assemblage atone time belonged to a vessel that was introduced intothe cave whole. Nevertheless, I am led to believe thata signification percentage of the cave’s pottery wasbrought in and deposited as sherds. A number of sherdswere recovered from contexts that were highly stableand essentially sheltered from erosive forces. Consequently,many of these sherds were in pristine condition.However, other sherds among them were visiblyweathered. This suggests that they were either exposedat the surface for some time and later introduced intothe cave or they were transported from less stable areasof the cave. The Saxché Orange Polychrome sherdspose a similar problem. None of the sixteen sherdsrecovered appear to be from the same vessel. It shouldbe noted that one hundred percent of the cave’s surfacewas surveyed and no additional Saxché OrangePolychrome sherds were found. Either the remainingportions of these broken vessels were subsequentlyremoved from the cave or the sherds were brought inand deposited as vessel fragments. Many of the MiddlePreclassic sherds were in good condition, which suggeststhat they were deposited during this early period ratherthan collected from a surface site (either as sherds orwhole vessels) and brought into the cave at a latertime.Two platform structures are located at the surfacenear the entrance of Actun Toh (figure 4.1.18). It ispossible that the cave itself was part of a culturallydefined precinct, where controls were placed on its

AMCS Bulletin 12 — Chapter 4 55already naturally restrictive access. Based on intriguingceramic data from Actun Toh, future excavation ofthese structures may reveal evidence of the earliestMaya occupation in the region.4.2. ACTUN TACBI HAThe first archaeological investigation of ActunTacbi Ha involved a brief visit by Scott Fedick andKarl Taube in 1990. INAH archaeologist Luis LeiraGuillermo officially reported the cave that same year.During the 1993 field season of the Yalahau project, Imade a trip to the cave with Kevin Hovey and JoséEstrada Faisal. We produced a provisional map as wellas a cursory collection of surface ceramics. Shortlythereafter, the cave was given the name Tacbi Ha (“hiddenwater”) by Karl Taube. The results of the 1993investigation were later published (Rissolo 1995) andare incorporated into this chapter.Actun Tacbi Ha contains five additional pools.Four of these are essentially pits or solution featuresthat reach the water table. A rather large pool is locatedalong the eastern edge of the cave. Like the mainpool at the base of the stairway, this pool was the focusof considerable attention and was marked by pottery.Evidence of mining is also present in Actun TacbiHa. This practice was confined to a travertine moundlocated in the eastern portion of the cave. The relativelythin “crust” of flowstone was removed to reveal asascab-like powder (figure 4.2.5). This material hasnot been analyzed, and may or may not resemble(chemically) the dolomitic material extracted fromActun Toh. Nevertheless, it is reasonable to assumethat the materials mined from these two caves werefunctionally related. As in Actun Toh, it is difficult todetermine the antiquity of this practice. The exposed(and obviously excavated) material in Actun Tacbi HaDescriptionThe cave, located 1 km east of the communityof Naranjal, is essentially a large,single-chambered collapse dome (see figures4.2.1 and 4.2.2). Its circumference isroughly ovoid and measures approximately40 m at its widest point. A prominentmound is located 14 m beneath the narrowentrance shaft. This mound appears toconsist entirely of collapse debris, whichaccumulated during the formation of theentrance above. Its borders are clearly delineated(perhaps artificially) and themound measures a maximum of 10.5 m indiameter and 2.5 m in height. Though themound has not been terraced (like in ActunToh), it has nevertheless been significantlymodified.A carefully constructed and well-preservedstairway leads from the top of themound to a pool below (figures 4.2.3 and4.2.4). This stairway consists of elevensteps. The risers of eight of these steps werecreated by horizontally placed speleothems(mostly stalactites), which were apparentlybroken-off from the cave floor and lowerportions of the ceiling. The pool (whichmarks the water table) is 5 m wide andapproximately 1 m deep. The only othermasonry feature in the cave is a crude stepor low wall, which spans a narrow slot tothe east of the pool.Figure 4.2.1. Map of Actun Tacbi Ha.Figure 4.2.2. Profile of Actun Tacbi Ha.

54AMCS Bulletin 12 — Chapter 4Closing RemarksFigure 4.1.18. Map of Actun Toh and associated surfacestructures.three lots (table 4.1.16). A total of 127 sherds werecollected from the treads of the stairway (SJ2O7-2). Istrongly suspect that this material tumbled into operation7 from the collapsing northern edge of the floor.In other words, these sherds were likely at one timedeposited as sub-floor construction fill. This was mostdefinitely the case with SJ2O7-1, which is characterizedby a steep flow of sherd-bearing fill that hasspilled out of the exposed sub-floor ballast. It is alsolocated beneath the section of the sub-floor that wasprofiled and collected (see figure 4.1.17 and table4.1.5). The ceramics in SJ2O7-2/1 were extracted frombeneath one of the steps and include sherds from theDzudzuquil and Sierra groups. Although MiddlePreclassic material is consistently associated with thesub-floor construction fill, it can be stated with somecertainty that the consolidation of the sub-floor fill aswell as the construction of the stairway into operation7, took place during a later period.Although the complexity of Actun Toh stands outamong other caves in the survey, it shares with themcertain distinct similarities. Notable modifications ofthe cave’s interior demonstrate the importance placedon the small (and seemingly insignificant) pool thatonce provided access to the water table. An establishedcircuit within the cave directed attention towards naturallyor artificially enclosed or delineated spaces. Inthe case of Actun Toh, the extraction of a sascab-likematerial was particularly valued. Points along thiscircuit were marked by offerings, while the paths themselveswere further designated as specialized routesby sherds scattered along them. The spatial organizationof Actun Toh is developed in more detail in thefinal chapter of the dissertation.The ceramic collection from Actun Toh attests toits long use history. A quantitative assessment of representedceramic groups suggests a strong LatePreclassic to Early Classic component. The fact thatno whole vessels were found within the cave can likelybe attributed to looting activities. It is unclear whetheror not each sherd in the cave’s diverse assemblage atone time belonged to a vessel that was introduced intothe cave whole. Nevertheless, I am led to believe thata signification percentage of the cave’s pottery wasbrought in and deposited as sherds. A number of sherdswere recovered from contexts that were highly stableand essentially sheltered from erosive <strong>for</strong>ces. Consequently,many of these sherds were in pristine condition.However, other sherds among them were visiblyweathered. This suggests that they were either exposedat the surface <strong>for</strong> some time and later introduced intothe cave or they were transported from less stable areasof the cave. The Saxché Orange Polychrome sherdspose a similar problem. None of the sixteen sherdsrecovered appear to be from the same vessel. It shouldbe noted that one hundred percent of the cave’s surfacewas surveyed and no additional Saxché OrangePolychrome sherds were found. Either the remainingportions of these broken vessels were subsequentlyremoved from the cave or the sherds were brought inand deposited as vessel fragments. Many of the MiddlePreclassic sherds were in good condition, which suggeststhat they were deposited during this early period ratherthan collected from a surface site (either as sherds orwhole vessels) and brought into the cave at a latertime.Two plat<strong>for</strong>m structures are located at the surfacenear the entrance of Actun Toh (figure 4.1.18). It ispossible that the cave itself was part of a culturallydefined precinct, where controls were placed on its

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!