12.07.2015 Views

searchable PDF - Association for Mexican Cave Studies

searchable PDF - Association for Mexican Cave Studies

searchable PDF - Association for Mexican Cave Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AMCS Bulletin 12 — Chapter 4 45Figure 4.1.14. Display of sherd frequency by ceramic group <strong>for</strong> Actun Toh.in fact correspond to the age of the floor. The samplefrom 30–40 cm produced a calibrated age of 1487–1224 BC. Although this sample was recovered from acultural stratum, it obviously can have no bearing onthe chronological assessment of the floor. Perhapscharcoal, resulting from a natural brush fire at the surfaceduring this period, washed into the cave. Here, itcould have remained <strong>for</strong> centuries be<strong>for</strong>e being incor-porated into the sub-floor fill as the ancientMaya collected the necessary building materialsfrom within the cave. The finalsample was recovered from 40–50 cm andproduced a calibrated age of 814–523 BC.Although Middle Preclassic ceramics werepresent in lower levels of the unit, I wouldconsider this sample’s chronological relationshipto its respective level to be suspectat best. The nature of the floor’s constructionhistory can be better understood byexamining the distribution of ceramic typesthroughout the unit (see table 4.1.3).As represented in the “battleship curve”in figure 4.1.16, Late Preclassic and EarlyClassic material are present at all levels ofthe unit. It is immediately apparent that theconstruction fill beneath the sascab layer isessentially homogenous. Even though themajority of the Middle Preclassic materialwas recovered from the lowest level, thissame level also contained Early Classicmaterial. Moreover, the presence of TitucOrange Polychrome and Cetelac Fibertemperedsherds restrict a terminus postquem construction date to the middle partof the Early Classic (ca. A.D. 450–550, seeBall [1982:108]). The occurrence of LatePreclassic sherds within the upper levels ofthe unit can be attributed to the inclusion of sherdbearingcave debris into a later construction episode.Most interesting is the presence of TerminalClassic Vista Alegre Striated sherds in the three upperlevels of unit A. Since the current surface of the floorconsists of tamped earth rather than plaster, the firstfew centimeters of the excavation can not be considereda sealed context. Nevertheless, the current surface ofTable 4.1.2. AMS Radiometric ages <strong>for</strong> Actun Toh, excavation unit A.Measurements conducted at the Center <strong>for</strong> Accelerator Mass Spectrometry,Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University ofCali<strong>for</strong>nia. (Calibration is made <strong>for</strong> 2 sigma using Calib 4.3.)Figure 4.1.15. Actun Toh. Unit A profile, NE sidewall (D. Rissolo).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!