Council ratification of items dealt with under ... - City of Bayswater
Council ratification of items dealt with under ... - City of Bayswater Council ratification of items dealt with under ... - City of Bayswater
Administration and CommunityServicesAttachment 11. City of Bayswater Feedback forProposed Domestic Cat LegislationProposal for Domestic Cat Legislation 19 July 2010Page 1 of 7CITY OF BAYSWATERFEEDBACK INFORMATIONPROPOSED CAT LEGISLATION CONSULTATION PAPERPlease note: question numbers allocated from Feedback Paper.2. What identification methods do you support?Microchipping - YesTags and Collars – YesRationale:Microchipping is a method of identification that provides for life long identification of animals.Microchipping should only be supported if there is a standard chip type that is used throughout theState.3. When should compulsory identification be introduced?To all cats on introduction of the legislation including microchipping and Tags and Collars.This could be phased in over a 6 month period.Rationale:By differentiating between animals already alive and yet to be born, it would provide an increasedproof required by any investigating officer. Evidence would need to be obtained that established theage of the cat that would not apply if all cats were required to be identified. This effect could last forsome 15 – 20 years after the introduction of the legislation.Microchipping is a method of identification that provides for life long identification of animals.Microchipping should only be supported if there is a standard chip type that is used throughout theState.4. At what age should identification be required?3 Months.Rationale:This will provide that the Cat and Dog Act would require the registration of animals after the age ofthree months. This would reduce the risk of mixed messages in the community.5. Are there any other quantifiable costs and benefits associated with identification (microchipping,collars and tags),The costs associated with dogs currently impounded after being left abandoned is considerablein any community. By requiring the compulsory microchipping and registration tags reducesthe likelihood of an animal being abandoned.
Administration and CommunityServicesAttachment 1Proposal for Domestic Cat Legislation 19 July 2010Page 2 of 71. City of Bayswater Feedback forProposed Domestic Cat LegislationAnd; will these proposals achieve the policy objectives?YesRationale:When animals are currently impounded an owner may choose to leave the animal to be destroyedbased on costs and penalties for any alleged offences relating to the animal. Compulsorymicrochipping would ensure that all owners of the cats collected may be identified through themicrochip.The policy objective is to reduce the number of cats being euthanaised. This should achieve thatdesired outcome.6. Is the existence of multiple microchip databases likely to cause a problem, and how can this beovercome?The current process for dog registrations requires that each Council hold a separate DogRegister. This is problematic when dogs are found, collected in another jurisdiction. Althoughnot significant, this problem could be overcome by providing regulations for the sharing of thisinformation, similar to the provisions of section 14(4) of the Dog Act 1976.Rationale:A Cat register maintained by the Local Authority would ensure that any revenue collected is directlyproportional to the number of domestic cats living in the district and the level of enforcement of thelegislation.7. Any other commentsThe City of Bayswater supports the introduction of Cat legislation subject to the State Governmentaddressing the issues raised.8. Do you support compulsory cat registration?YesRationale:Compulsory registration of cats would place a responsibility on the cat owner to comply withcommunity expectations relating to cat ownership. In the event cats are found abandoned, registrationwould reduce the number of cat owners denying ownership. Cat registrations would be required in theevent Cat legislation is introduced in order to fund the administration of the legislation.10. How long should the registration period be? (Can choose more than one)1 year or 3 years.Rationale:The registration process for cats and dogs could be combined. By ensuring that the process and feesare similar would mean that the community receives similar messages when registering both cats anddogs.
- Page 72 and 73: Planning and Development ServicesAt
- Page 74 and 75: Planning and Development ServicesAt
- Page 76 and 77: Planning and Development ServicesAt
- Page 78 and 79: Planning and Development ServicesAt
- Page 80 and 81: Planning and Development ServicesAt
- Page 82 and 83: Planning and Development ServicesAt
- Page 84 and 85: Planning and Development ServicesAt
- Page 86 and 87: Planning and Development ServicesAt
- Page 88 and 89: Planning and Development ServicesAt
- Page 90 and 91: Planning and Development ServicesAt
- Page 92 and 93: Planning and Development ServicesAt
- Page 94 and 95: Planning and Development ServicesAt
- Page 96 and 97: Planning and Development ServicesAt
- Page 98 and 99: Planning and Development ServicesAt
- Page 100 and 101: Planning and Development ServicesAt
- Page 102 and 103: Planning and Development ServicesAt
- Page 104 and 105: Planning and Development ServicesAt
- Page 106 and 107: Planning and Development ServicesAt
- Page 108 and 109: Planning and Development ServicesAt
- Page 110 and 111: Planning and Development ServicesAt
- Page 112 and 113: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 114 and 115: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 116 and 117: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 118 and 119: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 120 and 121: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 124 and 125: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 126 and 127: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 128 and 129: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 130 and 131: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 132 and 133: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 134 and 135: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 136 and 137: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 138 and 139: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 140 and 141: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 142 and 143: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 144 and 145: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 146 and 147: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 148 and 149: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 150 and 151: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 152 and 153: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 154 and 155: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 156 and 157: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 158 and 159: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 160 and 161: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 162 and 163: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 164 and 165: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 166 and 167: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 168 and 169: Administration and CommunityService
- Page 170 and 171: Administration and CommunityService
Administration and CommunityServicesAttachment 11. <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bayswater</strong> Feedback forProposed Domestic Cat LegislationProposal for Domestic Cat Legislation 19 July 2010Page 1 <strong>of</strong> 7CITY OF BAYSWATERFEEDBACK INFORMATIONPROPOSED CAT LEGISLATION CONSULTATION PAPERPlease note: question numbers allocated from Feedback Paper.2. What identification methods do you support?Microchipping - YesTags and Collars – YesRationale:Microchipping is a method <strong>of</strong> identification that provides for life long identification <strong>of</strong> animals.Microchipping should only be supported if there is a standard chip type that is used throughout theState.3. When should compulsory identification be introduced?To all cats on introduction <strong>of</strong> the legislation including microchipping and Tags and Collars.This could be phased in over a 6 month period.Rationale:By differentiating between animals already alive and yet to be born, it would provide an increasedpro<strong>of</strong> required by any investigating <strong>of</strong>ficer. Evidence would need to be obtained that established theage <strong>of</strong> the cat that would not apply if all cats were required to be identified. This effect could last forsome 15 – 20 years after the introduction <strong>of</strong> the legislation.Microchipping is a method <strong>of</strong> identification that provides for life long identification <strong>of</strong> animals.Microchipping should only be supported if there is a standard chip type that is used throughout theState.4. At what age should identification be required?3 Months.Rationale:This will provide that the Cat and Dog Act would require the registration <strong>of</strong> animals after the age <strong>of</strong>three months. This would reduce the risk <strong>of</strong> mixed messages in the community.5. Are there any other quantifiable costs and benefits associated <strong>with</strong> identification (microchipping,collars and tags),The costs associated <strong>with</strong> dogs currently impounded after being left abandoned is considerablein any community. By requiring the compulsory microchipping and registration tags reducesthe likelihood <strong>of</strong> an animal being abandoned.