GREEN GROWTH: FROM RELIGION TO REALITY - Sustainia
GREEN GROWTH: FROM RELIGION TO REALITY - Sustainia GREEN GROWTH: FROM RELIGION TO REALITY - Sustainia
Chapter 5Glaeser, Edward L. 2011. “Why Green Energy Can’t Power a JobEngine.” The New York Times: Economix. January 18. http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/18/why-green-energy-cantpower-a-job-engine/.Hanemann, W. Michael. 2007. “How California came to pass AB32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006,” Working Paper No.1040. Berkeley, CA: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics,University of California.Hargaddon, Andrew, and Martin Kenney. 2011. “Misguided Policy? FollowingVenture Capital into Clean Technology.” Working paper. April 5.Huberty, Mark, Jany Gao, and Juliana Mandell. 2011. “Shaping theGreen Growth Economy: a review of the public debate and theprospects for green growth.” Copenhagen, Denmark and Berkeley,California: Mandag Morgen and the Berkeley Roundtable on theInternational Economy.Kanellos, Michael. 2010. “Intel Heads Up $3.5 Billion Green/CleanTech Investment Fund,” Wired, February 23. http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/02/intel-heads-up-35-billion-greencleantech-investment-fund/.Kenney, Martin. 2011. Interview by Nina Kelsey and Juliana Mandell.Telephone with notes. Berkeley, California, March 16.Lecar, Matt. 2011. Interview by Nina Kelsey and Juliana Mandell.Telephone with notes. Berkeley, California, March 16.Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy.“Recovery Act Activities.” Last accessed July 28, 2011.http://www.lbl.gov/Publications/recovery/projects.html#energyLawrence Livermore National Laboratory. 2009. “A Tradition of ExcellenceContinues: 2009 Annual Report.” Last accessed July 28, 2011. https://www.llnl.gov/annual09/excellence/pdf/2009AnnualReport.pdfLifsher, Marc. 2010. “California Economy Still World’s Eight-Largest, Despite Recession,” LA Times. December 2. http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/money_co/2010/12/california-economyranking.htmlLutsey, Nicholas and Daniel Sperling. 2008. “America’s bottom-upclimate change mitigation policy,” Energy Policy 36: 673-685.Moore, Galen. 2011. “Cleantech-focused funds take over as generalVCs back off cleantech.” Mass High Tech, April 27. http://www.masshightech.com/stories/2011/04/25/weekly12-Cleantechfocused-funds-take-over-as-general-VCs-back-off-cleantech.htmlMitchell, Cynthia. 2009. “Stabilizing California’s Demand: The RealReasons Behind the State’s Energy Savings,” Public Utilities Fortnightly.Nemet, Gregory F., and Daniel M. Kammen. 2007. "U.S. Energy Researchand Development: Declining Investment, Increasing Need,and the Feasibility of Expansion."Energy Policy 35.1: 746-55.Power, Stephen. 2009. “Ethanol Groups Sue California Over Low-Carbon Rule,” The Wall Street Journal. December 24. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126169282611304857.htmlRandolph, Sean. 2011. Interview by Nina Kelsey and Juliana Mandell.Telephone with notes. Berkeley, California, March 8.Redman, Elizabeth. 2011. “Shifts in the Cleantech InvestmentLandscape.” Reuters, April 13. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/13/idUS74705167920110413.Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board, 2011. “Track theMoney.” Last accessed July 28, 2011. www.recovery.gov.Roland-Holst, David. 2008. “Energy Efficiency, Innovation, and JobCreation in California.” Research Papers on Energy, Resources, andEconomic Sustainability, UC Berkeley.Rosenfeld, Arthur H. 2008. “Energy Efficiency: The first and mostprofitable way to delay climate change” EPA Region IX, CaliforniaEnergy Commission.Rosenfeld, Arthur H. and Patrick K. McAulliffe. Edited by David W.Hafemeister. 2008. “Opportunities in the Building Sector”, Physicsof Sustainable Energy: Using Energy Efficiently and Producing itRenewably1044: 3-14.Rosenfeld, Arthur H., with Deborah Poskanzer. 2009. “A Graph IsWorth a Thousand Gigawatt-Hours: How California Came to Leadthe United States in Energy Efficiency.” Innovations 4 (2009): 57-79.Roosevelt, Margot. 2011. “New Mexico threatens a U-turn on environmentalregulations,” Los Angeles Times. January 5.Roosevelt, Margot. 2010. “California, New Mexico and 3 Canadianprovinces outline regional cap-and-trade.” Los Angeles Times, July28, 2010.Sudarshan, Anant and James L Sweeney. 2008. “Deconstructingthe ‘Rosenfeld Curve.’” Working Paper Precourt Energy EfficiencyCenter.Sweeney, James L. 2002. The California Electricity Crisis. Stanford:Hoover Institution Press.U.S. Census Bureau. 2010. Washington DC. http://www.census.gov/.U.S. Congressional Budget Office. 2010. “Federal Climate ChangePrograms: Funding History and Policy Issues.” Washington, DC:Pub. No. 4025.U.S. Department of Energy, Database of State Incentives for Renewablesand Efficiency. Dsireusa.org. Washington, DC: 2011. http://www.dsireusa.org/, 2011.U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Loan Programs Office. Lpo.energy.gov.Washington, DC: 2011. https://lpo.energy.gov/“Venture Beat’s best and worst of cleantech in 2010.” 2010. Reuters,December 29. http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/12/29/idUS120422778120101229.Walsh, Bryan. 2010. “Prop 23 Is Defeated,” Time. December9. http://www.time.com/ time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2035319_2034098_2034140,00.htmlWestern Climate Initiative. 2008. “Clean Energy: Creating Jobs,Protecting the Environment.” Westernclimatein.org.Prabhakar, Arati. 2011. Interview by Nina Kelsey and Juliana Mandell.Telephone with notes. Berkeley, California, March 29.60
Chapter xxxCOLORADOSTATE CASE ANALYSIS© Berkeley Roundtable on the International EconomyJune 15, 2011Prepared by Alice Maddenwith Jany Gao, Kate Goldman, and Nina Kelsey
- Page 10: Chapter 1for new innovation and inv
- Page 15 and 16: Chapter 134 Ibid.35 Information bas
- Page 17 and 18: Chapter 1Hughes, Thomas. 1983. Netw
- Page 19 and 20: Chapter 21 Overview: The country ca
- Page 21 and 22: Chapter xxxEUROPEAN UNION:GREEN GRO
- Page 23 and 24: Chapter 32 See, for instance Jacobs
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 313 Germany and Poland both
- Page 27 and 28: Chapter 317 This, of course, is lim
- Page 29: Chapter 321 This problem is unique
- Page 34 and 35: Chapter 4imports significantly more
- Page 36 and 37: Chapter 4such the policies in the n
- Page 38 and 39: Chapter 4concept became a central t
- Page 40: Chapter 4Gross energy consumption b
- Page 43 and 44: objectives." In Climate Change and
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter 51 In fact, the story is so
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 5tion of funds seems to rei
- Page 49 and 50: Chapter 5political structure that a
- Page 51 and 52: Chapter 51 IntroductionCalifornia
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 5reserves further contribut
- Page 55 and 56: Chapter 5ting regulatory infrastruc
- Page 57 and 58: Chapter 5world, standards set for t
- Page 59: Chapter 5take a more traditional co
- Page 63 and 64: Chapter 53.1 Public advocacyPublic
- Page 65 and 66: Chapter 53.4.1 Energy industryGiven
- Page 67 and 68: Chapter xxxKOREAA COUNTRY CASE ANAL
- Page 70 and 71: Chapter 6from 2012 to 2016 (MKE, 20
- Page 72 and 73: Chapter 6Current subsidies for elec
- Page 75 and 76: Chapter xxxCHINAA COUNTRY CASE ANAL
- Page 77 and 78: Chapter 72 In his investigation of
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter 7which caused temporary shu
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 77 Recent explorations show
- Page 83 and 84: Chapter 7ence/earth/02copenhagen.ht
- Page 85 and 86: Chapter xxxBRAZILA COUNTRY CASE ANA
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 86 INPE counts Amazon defor
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 817 This program is controv
- Page 91 and 92: Chapter 8off of its current track o
- Page 93 and 94: Chapter 823 Rosa et al. (2009, 16)
- Page 95 and 96: Chapter 829 For a detailed historic
- Page 97 and 98: Chapter 8(IPEA 26 May 2010, 16).34
- Page 100: TAKE LEAD, OCTOBER 12-13 TH ,2011 C
Chapter xxxCOLORADOSTATE CASE ANALYSIS© Berkeley Roundtable on the International EconomyJune 15, 2011Prepared by Alice Maddenwith Jany Gao, Kate Goldman, and Nina Kelsey