12.07.2015 Views

W.P.(C)(SH) No. 285/2009 Page 1 of 15 - Gauhati High Court

W.P.(C)(SH) No. 285/2009 Page 1 of 15 - Gauhati High Court

W.P.(C)(SH) No. 285/2009 Page 1 of 15 - Gauhati High Court

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

should promote you to the rank <strong>of</strong> SI and with the sameseniority as entitled. In this regard, it is clarified that you maychoose to take promotion in GD stream or technical stream asyou desire. In case you choose to seek promotion in GDstream, you may be asked to appear in DPC as and wheneligible and shall be promoted as SI (GD) if cleared by the DPCand subject to fulfillment <strong>of</strong> other terms and conditions. Incase you choose promotion in the Technical stream, you willhave to undergo required courses as per laid down procedureand then be promoted to the rank <strong>of</strong> SI/VM.5. Finally your contention that instructors detailed to imparttraining during the conduct <strong>of</strong> mandatory courses, should betechnically superior to you, is not tenable and not acceptedbecause the instructors in the training centers are selectedafter careful scrutiny and all <strong>of</strong> them are quite capable <strong>of</strong>imparting training on the subject allotted to them. Hence, incase you choose to seek promotion in the technical stream,you will have to undergo mandatory course, where theselection <strong>of</strong> instructors cannot be dictated by you. It shouldbe left to the ingenuity <strong>of</strong> senior <strong>of</strong>ficers to arrange suitableinstructors for the laid down curriculum irrespective <strong>of</strong> theirrank and qualification.6. It may also be mentioned that, while there were someuncertainties and confusion over promotion from HC/VM toSI/VM due to non availability <strong>of</strong> RRs, however, this should nothave been a reason for frustration as expressed in the letterunder reference. It is also mentioned that the language andtone and tanner <strong>of</strong> the contents <strong>of</strong> the letter are notcommensurate to the ethics <strong>of</strong> the force and may be betteravoided at your level. You may soon choose the right streamfor you promotion and take the promotion as suited best inyour opinion.Sd/-Dy. Inspector General (TPT)”W.P.(C)(<strong>SH</strong>) <strong>No</strong>. <strong>285</strong>/<strong>2009</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 7 <strong>of</strong> <strong>15</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!