12.07.2015 Views

W.P.(C)(SH) No. 285/2009 Page 1 of 15 - Gauhati High Court

W.P.(C)(SH) No. 285/2009 Page 1 of 15 - Gauhati High Court

W.P.(C)(SH) No. 285/2009 Page 1 of 15 - Gauhati High Court

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

continuous service in the Grade <strong>of</strong> Head Constable (VM). As regardsthe requirement <strong>of</strong> basic training course as prescribed by the DirectorGeneral from time to time, it is on record that the petitioner hasobtained the said qualification. In this connection, the petitioner hasreferred to Anenxure-6 movement order dated 28.05.2007. The saidtraining course was <strong>of</strong> 10 weeks duration. However, later on the BSFauthority insisted for training course <strong>of</strong> 36 weeks which has againbeen reduced to 4 weeks as per Annexure-5 communication dated09.04.2010 annexed to the additional affidavit filed by the petitioner.4. It is on the above basis, the claim <strong>of</strong> the petitioner is that he isentitled to get consideration for promotion, which he ought to havebeen called to appear in the DPC. However, he was not called for toappear in the DPC.5. When the petitioner agitated his grievance relating to nonconsideration <strong>of</strong> his case as per requirement <strong>of</strong> the aforesaid Rules <strong>of</strong>2006, he was communicated with the impugned communicationsdated 24.07.<strong>2009</strong> (Annexure-10) and dated 10.08.<strong>2009</strong> (Annexure-11). For a ready reference both the communications are quoted below:W.P.(C)(<strong>SH</strong>) <strong>No</strong>. <strong>285</strong>/<strong>2009</strong> <strong>Page</strong> 4 <strong>of</strong> <strong>15</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!