Something Absurdin BetweenBY MICHAEL VENTURAIt was such a simple song. It said such a simplething: “I want to hold your hand.” An impulsebasic as lust, or maybe more basic: contact; theacknowledgement of one for another, two together,the beginning of everything – clasped hands.“And when I touch you, I feel happy inside.”Just like that. Everybody had felt it. Everybodyknew it was true.And the song was everywhere. Even onthat ferry to Riker’s Island prison.Unembarrassed, childishly happy,the song tinkled from a plasticAM radio the size of a lunchbox, as though four wee Beatlestrilled in a tin can. Not muchis bleaker than a prison or aferry to a prison, and yet, eventhere, the song reminded youthat there’s such a thing as joy.You boarded the ferry beforedawn with cops and guards and whoknows who in that winter of 1964. It wasrarely as warm as 30 degrees. Wind blewthrough the river’s corridor, encasing you inunspeakable coldness. I was 18, working inthe prison mail room, in the special darknessthat was Riker’s, an atmosphere thick withviolence and bewilderment. <strong>The</strong> song insistedthat life was wonderful anyway.When you work in a prison, its despairsticks to your clothes and your spirit. A weekendisn’t enough to air you out – except thisparticular weekend in February. <strong>The</strong> Beatleslanded on Friday, to play Ed Sullivan’s liveTV show Sunday. That weekend, New YorkCity – a tough, gray, combative place in thosedays – was not itself. On subways and in diners,people smiled and spoke to one another.About the Beatles. “I Want to Hold YourHand” played constantly, and we, momentarily,were different – but in a way that felt,to me, oddly familiar.Not three months before, John Kennedygot himself shot dead. That day, and for daysafter, in diners, subways, and on street corners,folks spoke to one another suddenly, intimately,sharing the weight of the moment. This Beatlesweekend was like that, but instead of mournful,it was giddy.It seemed to me, at the time, a largethought: Beatlemania would not have beenpossible without the Kennedy assassination.<strong>The</strong> response to the assassination created,as never before, a template of media-instigated,media-connected mass feeling – akind of receptacle into which we poured ourinsecurities, grief, fears, failed hopes. Oncecreated, that template didn’t go away butawaited another blast of similarly intenseinput, and the next was the opposite of thefirst: Beatlemania was a receptacle into whichwe poured everything joyful, forgetful, hopelettersat 3amful, and, because the template was thesame, the public response was the same:Strangers everywhere spontaneously sharedthe buoyancy of the moment.I felt, in that thought, that I’d gleanedsomething about how the world feels itself tobe “the world” – the illusion, that is, of “theworld” as a purposeful entity. But a strikingaspect of such an insight is that, while funto ponder, it’s completely useless. As an18-year-old would-be poet, I jotteddown my thought and turnedup the radio for the next hit.Musically, the decade wastaking off. Beatles songs ranup and down the charts alongsidethe Drifters’ “Under theBoardwalk,” the Beach Boys’“I Get Around,” the RighteousBrothers’ “You’ve Lost That LovingFeeling,” the Kinks’ “All Day and Allof the Night,” the Zombies’ “She’s Not<strong>The</strong>re,” Martha & the Vandellas’ “Dancingin the Street,” the Temptations’ “My Girl,”the Animals’ “House of the Rising Sun,”<strong>The</strong>m’s “Gloria,” Sam Cooke’s “A ChangeIs Gonna Come,” and Bob Dylan’s “<strong>The</strong>Times <strong>The</strong>y Are A-Changin’” – as though themusic knew something was up, somethingwas coming, something exciting and maybescary, a break with the past that many wouldcelebrate, many would regret, and a fewwould do both. I don’t think it’s only in retrospectthat underneath it all one felt a greatand trembling poignancy. What is poignancybut the feeling of “hello” and “goodbye” atthe same time?When A Hard Day’s Night came outthat summer, I saw it with a half-dozenor so friends, gals and guys, at a theatrein Mahopac, N.Y. A Hard Day’s Night wasverbal and visual slapstick in gorgeousblack and white, the songs all hope andlight, and the faces of the Beatles so familiarby then that it had the feel of a homemovie – somehow (this was their magic),they were us. Irreverent but sweet. Slylyhip but no threat. To absorb for the firsttime, with no preconceptions, A HardDay’s Night’s happiness, its sense of possibility,its message that nothing couldstop or repress such joy and that nothingwould go wrong ever, the music as irrepressibleas it was inclusive – it was toomuch for us!We left that theatre so hungry for life thatwe did the only reasonable thing: In the hotnight air, we ran, danced, and shouted allover Mahopac’s graveyard, as though onlythe dead would understand our urgency tolive. But there it was again: All this joy hadsomething to do with death.JASON STOUTI know someone who saw that movie 30times. Don’t know how many times I sawit – six, maybe 10. And, I promise you, noneof us registered the moment when Ringo said,wistfully, “Being middle-aged and old takes upmost of your time, doesn’t it?” (Yeah. It does.)Dancing, yelping, and leaping over tombstones,I stood suddenly still – here wasBeatlemania, death, and something absurdin between. Me! So I screamed, loud as Icould, leapt atop a gravestone, balanced,whooped, and danced off, while the cloudedmoon and the future hovered like shroudedangels. I remember someone said, “<strong>The</strong>Beatles are heralds.”Sept. 20, 1964. I’d left Riker’s Island forTimes Square – at the time, there was nofunkier neighborhood on the continent. Iworked as a counterman at a diner on EighthAvenue. Prostitutes displayed their wares inthe window booths; cops came by for payoffs;an ex-Marine closet queen worked the counterwith me – it was an education. When I’d getoff work I felt, at last, that I had the right towalk the streets as a full sharer in life, earningmy way, with no backup and no need of any.That was me after a 12-hour shift, mypockets full of money as I walked to SeventhAvenue – a person of responsibility. My familydepended on me. While friends wonderedwhat to do with their lives, I had a task, whichwas more freeing than you might suppose.Serious life had begun.Only to become unserious in the extremewhen I turned the corner and was swept intoa mass of screaming virginal girls who filledTimes Square, spilling into the streets, draggingwith them all the usual denizens – cops,whores, hustlers, hoods, grunt workers likeme. <strong>The</strong> girls had no idea where they wereor what was around them as they teemedtoward the Paramount’s marquee, which wasbright with “BEATLES TONIGHT!”<strong>The</strong>re was no resisting this mob, turningthe corner east on 43rd, packed with girls,no traffic possible, all of them jumping upand down, screaming, pointing to two litwindows about four stories up. In each windowwere two shadow figures, silhouettedblack against their room’s light, easily recognizableby their hairdos. <strong>The</strong>y waved to thehappy masses.I was as happy as anyone. I liked thembest that way, as shadows, brightly backlitabove that giddily maddened, funky,dangerous neighborhood. <strong>The</strong>se were theBeatles of those first childlike songs,before they and the decade darkened, andthey, too, became swept away by whatthey’d heralded.I elbowed myself out of that crowd andwalked crosstown to Grand Central Station.A big moon hung above the Empire StateBuilding. And I thought of that moment in thegraveyard, when I was even happier, and something– I can’t exactly say what – had seemedincredibly clear.It was some kind of way to be 18. A wildmoment of clarity, useless in itself, but to besavored in memory.■26 T H E A U S T I N C H R O N I C L E JULY 3, <strong>2009</strong> a u s t i n c h r o n i c l e . c o m
MISSING CONTINUED FROM P.24NEWSCOURTESY OF RUDY PALTAUF<strong>The</strong> MissingWorking missingpersons is a dauntingtask. APD’s twomanmissing personsinvestigation teamworks roughly 4,000cases each year – including runaways (thebulk of the cases), disappearances, andabductions. In the first five months of<strong>2009</strong>, the unit already had 1,681 cases inits queue. And working these cases is a distinctlydifferent proposition than working,say, a robbery or homicide. <strong>The</strong>re, says Scott’spartner, Detective David Gann, you’ve got adistinct crime scene, and the questionbecomes: Where did the perp go from there?In missing persons, the first order of businessis to determine whether a crime even happened(see “Missing in <strong>Austin</strong>,” p.25).In the case of Roxanne Paltauf, there wasn’tnecessarily anything at first to suggest she’ddone anything else than just walk off. “<strong>The</strong>case came [to us] as, they got into an argument,and she walked off – with just thatinformation,” Gann says. “Well, you canimagine, working missing cases in a city witha population the size we have, that’s a prettycommon occurrence. Boyfriends and girlfriendsget into arguments, and one of themwalks off. <strong>The</strong>y don’t come home that night,[and the] very next morning their significantother reports them missing.” Often the questionof how to proceed in such cases turns ona consistency of behavior – for example, hasthe person walked off before? According toWalls, Roxanne had done just that.At first, police had no reason to suspectthat Walls – the one who initially reported thedisappearance – wasn’t being honest. “It’sreally hard in this profession to pick andchoose which cases have nuances that makeyou say, ‘<strong>The</strong>re’s something to this; we needto immediately grasp what happened,’” saysScott. “And in that sense, I guess everythingthat could go wrong [with Roxanne’s case]did go wrong.” Not that police didn’t, asScott puts it, “use due diligence.” Roxanne’sname was immediately put into a be-on-thelookoutalert for all patrol officers, and vitalinformation was fed into the state and nationalcrime computers. But it wasn’t until laterthat police had enough information to suggestthat there might be far more involved inRoxanne’s disappearance than just an unremarkablelovers’ spat.For example, there was the purse: Roxanne’spink purse that she supposedly left, with hercell phone, her wallet, and her jewelry, insidethe hotel room. Roxanne never went anywherewithout her purse. Never. On that pointfriends and family completely agree. Ellis saysshe would actually get into arguments withRoxanne about her always needing to carry herpurse everywhere they went. Gonzales agrees:“Anywhere she goes, she’s got that purse onher shoulder.” When Harris told Gonzales ithad been left behind, “I knew immediatelythat something was wrong.” <strong>The</strong> fact that herjewelry was also leftbehind, inside her wallet,let Ellis know somethingwas not right.Roxanne never wentwithout her rings:“No. … Even when wewent swimming, that girl woreaccessories.” If Roxanne was going to stormout of the room – even to cool off – shewould have taken her purse and certainlywould have taken her cell phone. Harris isadamant about that – and she would havecalled home, say those who knew Roxannewell. “That made me very nervous, the factthat her mother never heard from her,” saysComer, Roxanne’s teacher. “I couldn’t see herbeing strung out, or whatever, so bad that shewasn’t going to call her mother.”Everyone insists that Roxanne talked to hermother two, three times, or more, each day. Onthe evening of <strong>July</strong> 7, 2006, those calls ceased.“<strong>The</strong> one thing that struck me, the day shedisappeared, the calls stopped,” said privateinvestigator Tim Young. To him, that clearlymeans that whatever happened, Roxanne didnot simply disappear of her own volition. “Atthat point in the investigation, it seemed clearthat she was not with us anymore. <strong>The</strong>re wasabsolutely no trace of Roxanne.”<strong>The</strong>re was, however, one additional cluethat appeared just six days after she wentmissing. A security guard named Bryan Parkernoticed Roxanne’s Texas identification cardtucked into the wallet of another man whowas accused of assaulting a woman at theMotel 6 just up the street from the BudgetInn. According to the police report of that <strong>July</strong>13, 2006, incident, a man named GeoffreyMoore, now 33, picked up a Perfect 10 Men’sClub dancer and her husband, outside theChevron station at Rundberg and I-35. Mooreasked, “How much for her?” She replied thatshe was not a prostitute but would do a privatedance for him at the motel. <strong>The</strong> threewent to the motel, and Moore and the womanentered the room. He locked the door, however,before the husband could get inside.<strong>The</strong> woman alleged that Moore attackedher and tried to rape her. <strong>The</strong> husband heardhis girlfriend shouting, got Parker and a passkey,and the two men tried to get into theroom. When they finally got the door open,the husband attacked Moore, who fled, leavingbehind his wallet and his hearing aid.When Parker picked up the wallet, he foundRoxanne’s ID. Moore later came back to thescene, to retrieve his things, and was arrestedby police. He was never charged – in part, itseems, because the chain of events that led tohis alleged attack of the woman aren’t entirelyclear. Moore, for example, told police that hetried to get intimate with the woman but sherefused. He then went into the bathroom andcame back out to find her rifling through hispockets, trying to steal from him. Could ithave been that the woman and man luredMoore and then tried to roll him? Or was it anunprovoked sexual assault? Ultimately, theTravis Co. District Attorney’s Office declinedto pursue sexual assault charges againstMoore, and the case was closed. (Moorecould not be reached for comment.)But the incident did provide Harris andpolice with yet another lead. How had Mooregotten Roxanne’s license? To date, that is notentirely clear – even though detectives havespoken with Moore about Roxanne’s disappearance.But police say they’re certain thatneither Walls nor Moore have told everythingthey know about Roxanne. Walls’ attitude isespecially frustrating. “People don’t realizethat although I feel that he could be moreforthcoming,” says Scott, “I don’t have anylegal rights to force him to do anything. Anduntil I get the kind of forensic evidence thatwould allow me to go to a grand jury, to forcehim to answer questions, I can’t. I mean, it’snot like in the movies, where you can just goto somebody and say, ‘Well, we’re taking youdowntown.’ Because if they don’t want to …all we can say is, ‘Well, that’s a real bummer.’We can’t just throw you in a car.”More importantly, says Scott, Walls “justdoesn’t care that he’s a suspect. [H]e’s nostranger to bad-acting, so it’s not a huge burdenfor him.”Ultimately, though, Scott says he will findthe truth, from Moore or Walls (or whoeverelse), to solve the mystery of Roxanne’s disappearance.“Basically, I’ve got two violentoffenders. Both of them are lying to me,” saysScott. “[T]hey’re both hiding criminal activity.But I think one of them is hiding a murder.”Waiting for Answers<strong>The</strong> questions continue to haunt Harris.Where is Roxanne? What happened to her?As the years have passed, the questions havebecome more detailed and more disturbing:Did Walls try to roll Moore? Could he haveused Roxanne as bait to do just that? DidMoore, who had been popped before for carryinga butcher knife in his car while trollingfor hookers along Middle Lane, happen uponRoxanne and try to solicit her? Or maybe, didhe recognize her as Walls’ girlfriend, from aprevious encounter?<strong>The</strong> questions, the possibilities, feel endless.Harris and Doyle have staked out motelsnear Rundberg, they’ve walked the streetshanding out fliers asking people to “PleaseHelp” Harris find her daughter, they’ve postedalerts and questions on the Web, gotten Roxanne’sstory featured on America’s MostWanted, and in turn they’ve been approachedby psychics. So far they’ve made little progress.Harris still holds great hope that theright person, with the right tip, will finallyhave the courage to tell the truth. “My biggestthing is, is Roxanne out there? Is she alone? Isshe scared? Is she crying out for help and Ijust can’t hear my daughter?” she asks. “Ineed my closure. I need to find my daughterone way or another.”Anyone with information about the disappearanceof Roxanne Paltauf can call an anonymous tip lineat 800/670-6760 or APD’s missing persons unit at974-5250.SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE30K-60K-90KTUNE-UPSEXHAUSTCALL FORESTIMATES326-3555www.jeepmasters.com2617 SOUTHFIRST ST.a u s t i n c h r o n i c l e . c o m JULY 3, <strong>2009</strong> T H E A U S T I N C H R O N I C L E 27