12.07.2015 Views

Organization and Performance of Cotton Sectors in Africa ... - infoDev

Organization and Performance of Cotton Sectors in Africa ... - infoDev

Organization and Performance of Cotton Sectors in Africa ... - infoDev

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1970s. Until the mid-1950s, the Ug<strong>and</strong>a L<strong>in</strong>t Market<strong>in</strong>g Board was alsoresponsible for the export <strong>of</strong> Tanganyikan l<strong>in</strong>t.The cotton sector <strong>in</strong> Mozambique was also based on smallholder productionfor most <strong>of</strong> its history, with the exception <strong>of</strong> 1965–75, when grow<strong>in</strong>gopposition to the colonial government <strong>in</strong> the north (the cotton grow<strong>in</strong>g heartl<strong>and</strong>)prompted the government to promote production on large Europeancontrolledfarms. By contrast, large-scale farmers <strong>of</strong> European orig<strong>in</strong> droveearly sector development <strong>in</strong> Zimbabwe. At least until 1980, the large-scale farmershad the political power to advocate for the establishment <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<strong>of</strong> research <strong>and</strong> market<strong>in</strong>g systems to support their production activities.ESA <strong>Cotton</strong> <strong>Sectors</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Post-Independence YearsFrom 1960 to 1990, two ma<strong>in</strong> changes occurred <strong>in</strong> ESA cotton sectors. First,countries achiev<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dependence transferred control over the sector, with thegovernment (or government-controlled organizations) play<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>grole <strong>in</strong> seed cotton purchase <strong>and</strong> g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g at the expense <strong>of</strong> the private sector.The purported reason for these changes was typically to support smallholdercotton farmers. At the same time, performance decl<strong>in</strong>ed seriously <strong>in</strong> all countriesexcept Zimbabwe.In both Ug<strong>and</strong>a <strong>and</strong> Tanzania, regional cooperative unions replaced Asianbus<strong>in</strong>essmen as buyers <strong>and</strong> g<strong>in</strong>ners <strong>of</strong> seed cotton. The cooperative movementstarted as a member-driven phenomenon, but politicians soon exerted governmentcontrol. In Ug<strong>and</strong>a, cooperatives were given monopoly rights over seedcotton purchase <strong>and</strong> g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1969, with the L<strong>in</strong>t Market<strong>in</strong>g Board h<strong>and</strong>l<strong>in</strong>gthe market<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>t <strong>and</strong> seed <strong>and</strong> regulat<strong>in</strong>g the cooperatives. In Tanzania,cooperatives displaced Asian bus<strong>in</strong>essmen dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1960s, <strong>in</strong>itially withfarmer support, then through force <strong>of</strong> law. At the same time, the governmentattempted to control the powerful Victoria Federation <strong>of</strong> Cooperative Unions(seen as an alternative center <strong>of</strong> power to the rul<strong>in</strong>g party) by replac<strong>in</strong>g it withthe Nyanza Cooperative Union. State-imposed cooperatives performed poorly<strong>in</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> the country’s ma<strong>in</strong> cash crops, thus cooperative unions wereabolished <strong>in</strong> 1976 <strong>and</strong> a parastatal Tanzania <strong>Cotton</strong> Authority assumed responsibilityfor crop purchases from village-based cooperative societies.<strong>Cotton</strong> production experienced a precipitate collapse <strong>in</strong> both Ug<strong>and</strong>a <strong>and</strong>Mozambique <strong>in</strong> the mid-1970s. With the seizure <strong>of</strong> power by Idi Am<strong>in</strong>, l<strong>in</strong>tproduction <strong>in</strong> Ug<strong>and</strong>a plummeted from 78,000 tons <strong>in</strong> 1972 to just 14,000 tons<strong>in</strong> 1976, underm<strong>in</strong>ed by poor policies, escalat<strong>in</strong>g costs <strong>and</strong> mismanagement atthe cooperatives <strong>and</strong> the L<strong>in</strong>t Market<strong>in</strong>g Board. Similarly, with <strong>in</strong>dependence<strong>in</strong> Mozambique <strong>in</strong> 1975, seed cotton production fell from a peak <strong>of</strong> over140,000 tons <strong>in</strong> 1973 to below 40,000 tons <strong>in</strong> 1976. Production by commercialfarmers collapsed to around 20 percent <strong>of</strong> its immediate pre-<strong>in</strong>dependencepeak, <strong>and</strong> smallholder production decl<strong>in</strong>ed sharply, discouraged by disastrouscentral plann<strong>in</strong>g policies. With the outbreak <strong>of</strong> civil war <strong>in</strong> both countries,HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND RECENT INSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION 39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!