Organization and Performance of Cotton Sectors in Africa ... - infoDev
Organization and Performance of Cotton Sectors in Africa ... - infoDev
Organization and Performance of Cotton Sectors in Africa ... - infoDev
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1970s. Until the mid-1950s, the Ug<strong>and</strong>a L<strong>in</strong>t Market<strong>in</strong>g Board was alsoresponsible for the export <strong>of</strong> Tanganyikan l<strong>in</strong>t.The cotton sector <strong>in</strong> Mozambique was also based on smallholder productionfor most <strong>of</strong> its history, with the exception <strong>of</strong> 1965–75, when grow<strong>in</strong>gopposition to the colonial government <strong>in</strong> the north (the cotton grow<strong>in</strong>g heartl<strong>and</strong>)prompted the government to promote production on large Europeancontrolledfarms. By contrast, large-scale farmers <strong>of</strong> European orig<strong>in</strong> droveearly sector development <strong>in</strong> Zimbabwe. At least until 1980, the large-scale farmershad the political power to advocate for the establishment <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<strong>of</strong> research <strong>and</strong> market<strong>in</strong>g systems to support their production activities.ESA <strong>Cotton</strong> <strong>Sectors</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Post-Independence YearsFrom 1960 to 1990, two ma<strong>in</strong> changes occurred <strong>in</strong> ESA cotton sectors. First,countries achiev<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dependence transferred control over the sector, with thegovernment (or government-controlled organizations) play<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>grole <strong>in</strong> seed cotton purchase <strong>and</strong> g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g at the expense <strong>of</strong> the private sector.The purported reason for these changes was typically to support smallholdercotton farmers. At the same time, performance decl<strong>in</strong>ed seriously <strong>in</strong> all countriesexcept Zimbabwe.In both Ug<strong>and</strong>a <strong>and</strong> Tanzania, regional cooperative unions replaced Asianbus<strong>in</strong>essmen as buyers <strong>and</strong> g<strong>in</strong>ners <strong>of</strong> seed cotton. The cooperative movementstarted as a member-driven phenomenon, but politicians soon exerted governmentcontrol. In Ug<strong>and</strong>a, cooperatives were given monopoly rights over seedcotton purchase <strong>and</strong> g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1969, with the L<strong>in</strong>t Market<strong>in</strong>g Board h<strong>and</strong>l<strong>in</strong>gthe market<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>t <strong>and</strong> seed <strong>and</strong> regulat<strong>in</strong>g the cooperatives. In Tanzania,cooperatives displaced Asian bus<strong>in</strong>essmen dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1960s, <strong>in</strong>itially withfarmer support, then through force <strong>of</strong> law. At the same time, the governmentattempted to control the powerful Victoria Federation <strong>of</strong> Cooperative Unions(seen as an alternative center <strong>of</strong> power to the rul<strong>in</strong>g party) by replac<strong>in</strong>g it withthe Nyanza Cooperative Union. State-imposed cooperatives performed poorly<strong>in</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> the country’s ma<strong>in</strong> cash crops, thus cooperative unions wereabolished <strong>in</strong> 1976 <strong>and</strong> a parastatal Tanzania <strong>Cotton</strong> Authority assumed responsibilityfor crop purchases from village-based cooperative societies.<strong>Cotton</strong> production experienced a precipitate collapse <strong>in</strong> both Ug<strong>and</strong>a <strong>and</strong>Mozambique <strong>in</strong> the mid-1970s. With the seizure <strong>of</strong> power by Idi Am<strong>in</strong>, l<strong>in</strong>tproduction <strong>in</strong> Ug<strong>and</strong>a plummeted from 78,000 tons <strong>in</strong> 1972 to just 14,000 tons<strong>in</strong> 1976, underm<strong>in</strong>ed by poor policies, escalat<strong>in</strong>g costs <strong>and</strong> mismanagement atthe cooperatives <strong>and</strong> the L<strong>in</strong>t Market<strong>in</strong>g Board. Similarly, with <strong>in</strong>dependence<strong>in</strong> Mozambique <strong>in</strong> 1975, seed cotton production fell from a peak <strong>of</strong> over140,000 tons <strong>in</strong> 1973 to below 40,000 tons <strong>in</strong> 1976. Production by commercialfarmers collapsed to around 20 percent <strong>of</strong> its immediate pre-<strong>in</strong>dependencepeak, <strong>and</strong> smallholder production decl<strong>in</strong>ed sharply, discouraged by disastrouscentral plann<strong>in</strong>g policies. With the outbreak <strong>of</strong> civil war <strong>in</strong> both countries,HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND RECENT INSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION 39