to reach 25 million tons <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> 2006, up from 10.2 million tons <strong>in</strong> 1960.Most <strong>of</strong> this growth came from Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>and</strong> India, whose production quadrupleddur<strong>in</strong>g that period. Today, these two countries account for almost 45 percent<strong>of</strong> world cotton production <strong>and</strong> more than half <strong>of</strong> global consumption.Other countries that significantly <strong>in</strong>creased their production shares dur<strong>in</strong>g thisperiod were Brazil, Greece, Pakistan, <strong>and</strong> Turkey (see table 2.1). Some newentrants also contributed to this growth. Australia, for example, which producedonly 2,000 tons <strong>of</strong> cotton <strong>in</strong> 1960, averaged 0.5 million tons between1995 <strong>and</strong> 2005. Francophone <strong>Africa</strong> produced less than 100,000 tons <strong>in</strong> the1960s <strong>and</strong> now produces 10 times that much. The United States <strong>and</strong> the CentralAsian republics, two <strong>of</strong> the four dom<strong>in</strong>ant cotton producers dur<strong>in</strong>g the1960s, have ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed their production at about the same levels, effectivelyhalv<strong>in</strong>g their global output shares. A number <strong>of</strong> Central American countries thattogether accounted for 250,000 tons dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1970s now produce virtually nocotton at all.About one-third <strong>of</strong> cotton production is traded <strong>in</strong>ternationally. The threedom<strong>in</strong>ant exporters—the United States, Central Asia, <strong>and</strong> Francophone<strong>Africa</strong>—account for more than two-thirds <strong>of</strong> global exports. Overall, Sub-Saharan <strong>Africa</strong> (SSA) <strong>in</strong>creased its share <strong>in</strong> world cotton trade from 7 percent<strong>in</strong> 1960 to 15 percent <strong>in</strong> 2006. However, the export performances <strong>of</strong> West <strong>and</strong>Central <strong>Africa</strong> (WCA) <strong>and</strong> East <strong>and</strong> Southern <strong>Africa</strong> (ESA) differ considerably.In 1960, WCA accounted for a little more than 1 percent <strong>of</strong> global exportswhile today it accounts for more than 11 percent. Exports from ESA, however,have decl<strong>in</strong>ed from 6 percent <strong>in</strong> 1960 to 4 percent today.World prices for cotton have been decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g mostly as a result <strong>of</strong> competitionon the supply side, which has driven down production costs; such reductionshave been associated primarily with technological improvements result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>yield <strong>in</strong>creases from 300 kilograms <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>t per hectare <strong>in</strong> the early 1960s to about700 kilograms <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>t per hectare <strong>in</strong> 2005 (world average). This yield <strong>in</strong>creasereflects the <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> improved varieties <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased use <strong>of</strong> irrigation<strong>and</strong> chemical fertilizers. The spread <strong>of</strong> genetically modified (GM) seed technology<strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries <strong>and</strong> precision farm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> developed countries isexpected to reduce the costs <strong>of</strong> production even further.More than one-quarter <strong>of</strong> the area allocated to cotton is currently plantedus<strong>in</strong>g GM varieties, account<strong>in</strong>g for almost 40 percent <strong>of</strong> world production. GMcotton <strong>in</strong> the United States—where it was first <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> 1996—currentlyaccounts for about 80 percent <strong>of</strong> the U.S. area allocated to cotton. Other majorGM cotton producers are Argent<strong>in</strong>a (70 percent <strong>of</strong> its cotton area), Australia(80 percent), Ch<strong>in</strong>a (60 percent), Colombia (35 percent), India (10 percent),Mexico (40 percent), <strong>and</strong> South <strong>Africa</strong> (90 percent). 12 Countries at a trial stage<strong>in</strong>clude Brazil, Burk<strong>in</strong>a Faso (the only SSA country), Israel, Pakistan, <strong>and</strong>Turkey (<strong>Cotton</strong> Outlook 2005).Although the past decade has witnessed the expansion <strong>of</strong> the organic movement<strong>in</strong> other commodities, cotton has not enjoyed much success. Organic12 BAFFES AND ESTUR
Table 2.1 Global Balance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Cotton</strong> Market (thous<strong>and</strong> metric tons)Country or Region 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2005 2006 2007ProductionCh<strong>in</strong>a 1,372 1,995 2,707 4,508 4,417 5,714 6,729 8,078India 1,012 909 1,322 1,989 2,380 4,148 4,590 5,355United States 3,147 2,219 2,422 3,376 3,818 5,201 4,731 4,182Pakistan 306 543 714 1,638 1,816 2,089 2,115 1,845Central Asia 1,491 2,342 2,661 2,593 1,412 1,828 1,719 1,788Brazil 425 549 623 717 939 1,038 1,381 1,556Turkey 192 400 500 655 880 800 850 675Francophone <strong>Africa</strong> 63 140 224 562 728 937 888 571Greece 63 110 115 213 421 430 300 300Australia 2 19 99 433 804 589 253 116World 10,201 11,740 13,831 18,970 19,437 24,775 25,312 26,213ExportsUnited States 1,444 848 1,290 1,697 1,472 3,821 3,048 3,092Central Asia 381 553 876 1,835 1,203 1,454 1,467 1,324India 53 34 140 255 24 800 1,050 1,300Francophone <strong>Africa</strong> 48 137 185 498 767 1,013 928 609Brazil 152 220 21 167 68 429 300 500Australia 0 4 53 329 849 628 483 270Greece 33 0 13 86 244 355 243 223Egypt, Arab Rep. <strong>of</strong> 346 304 162 18 79 100 100 125Syrian Arab Rep. 97 134 71 91 212 191 100 65World 3,667 3,875 4,414 5,081 5,857 9,801 8,270 8,247Source: ICAC various issues.Note: Bangladesh is <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> Pakistan through 1970. Francophone <strong>Africa</strong> comprises Ben<strong>in</strong>, Burk<strong>in</strong>a Faso, Cameroon, the Central <strong>Africa</strong>n Republic, Chad,Côte d’Ivoire, Gu<strong>in</strong>ea, Madagascar, Mali, Niger, Senegal, <strong>and</strong> Togo. Central Asia comprises Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan,<strong>and</strong> Uzbekistan. Years refer to market<strong>in</strong>g seasons, for example, 2006 is 2006/07 (August through July).13
- Page 1: AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENTOr
- Page 4 and 5: AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENTSe
- Page 6 and 7: © 2009 The International Bank for
- Page 8 and 9: Section II. Historical Background a
- Page 11 and 12: BOXES, FIGURES, AND TABLESBoxes2.1
- Page 13: 5.2 Summary of Pricing Mechanisms i
- Page 16 and 17: eference are limited to neighboring
- Page 19 and 20: ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis study was carri
- Page 21 and 22: ABBREVIATIONS¢ U.S. centACPAgricul
- Page 23: US$U shWAEMUWCAWTOU.S. dollarUganda
- Page 26 and 27: output markets, improving productiv
- Page 28 and 29: etween these competing needs, provi
- Page 30 and 31: ■■■■■competition increase
- Page 32 and 33: monopolies range from 0.98 to 1.15,
- Page 34 and 35: macroeconomics, developments in com
- Page 36 and 37: central body and that the state nee
- Page 39 and 40: CHAPTER ONEIntroductionDavid Tschir
- Page 41 and 42: The debate about how to deal with t
- Page 43 and 44: Figure 1.1 Map of Africa Highlighti
- Page 45: hypotheses about sector performance
- Page 50 and 51: cotton production was introduced in
- Page 52 and 53: Figure 2.2 Nominal Cotton Prices (U
- Page 54 and 55: Box 2.1 (Continued)Togo, 39 percent
- Page 56 and 57: Box 2.2 Cotton SubsidiesCotton subs
- Page 58 and 59: efers specifically to the presence
- Page 60 and 61: picking, storage, handling, or tran
- Page 62 and 63: national monopoly (state-owned or p
- Page 65: SECTION TWOHistorical Background an
- Page 68 and 69: shares belonging to governments, an
- Page 70 and 71: Changes Made Since the End of the 1
- Page 72 and 73: long-term development strategies, (
- Page 74 and 75: possible link between price-setting
- Page 76 and 77: production fell further, to lows of
- Page 78 and 79: all aspects of the chain from input
- Page 80 and 81: suggestions (a) of establishing fas
- Page 82 and 83: Figure 4.1 Decision Tree for Cotton
- Page 84 and 85: Figure 4.2 African Cotton Sector Ty
- Page 86 and 87: Box 4.1 Is This Typology Specific t
- Page 88 and 89: 52Table 4.1 Trading Off: Strengths
- Page 90 and 91: CONCEPTUALIZATION OF THE LINKS BETW
- Page 92 and 93: chosen in this book and the impact
- Page 94 and 95: Table 4.3 Expected Performance alon
- Page 96 and 97: Box 4.2 (Continued)Second, farmers
- Page 99:
SECTION THREEComparative Analysis:C
- Page 102 and 103:
PRICING MECHANISMS IN WCAPricing me
- Page 104 and 105:
efore planting, price risk in the s
- Page 106 and 107:
Table 5.3 Summary of Producer Share
- Page 108 and 109:
Finally, FOT price shares in WCA ro
- Page 110 and 111:
MALI AND CAMEROON: GOVERNMENT MONOP
- Page 112 and 113:
Significant in Mozambique, the comp
- Page 114 and 115:
Zimbabwe transitioned during the 19
- Page 116 and 117:
Box 6.1 (Continued)A move from a co
- Page 118 and 119:
82Table 6.1 Summary of Input Supply
- Page 120 and 121:
84Table 6.1 (Continued)IndicatorsCo
- Page 123 and 124:
CHAPTER SEVENQuality ControlGérald
- Page 125 and 126:
Tanzania Competitive 1 2 Very lax n
- Page 127 and 128:
Figure 7.1 Estimated Premium for To
- Page 129 and 130:
all fiber coming from Africa—are
- Page 131 and 132:
Box 7.1 (Continued)newly liberalize
- Page 133 and 134:
CHAPTER EIGHTValorization of SeedCo
- Page 135 and 136:
competitive market in some of the o
- Page 137 and 138:
a few years, it indicates that some
- Page 139 and 140:
should eventually make a difference
- Page 141 and 142:
CHAPTER NINECotton ResearchDuncan B
- Page 143 and 144:
With regard to human and financial
- Page 145 and 146:
■■■Be involved in setting res
- Page 147 and 148:
made royalty payments to CRI. When
- Page 149:
and to identify complementary inves
- Page 153 and 154:
CHAPTER TENYields and Returns toFar
- Page 155 and 156:
fact that 55 percent of cotton is p
- Page 157 and 158:
Yields by Farmer TypeTo assess perf
- Page 159 and 160:
Factors beyond company services als
- Page 161 and 162:
Table 10.1 Summary Crop Budgets by
- Page 163 and 164:
According to the focus group inform
- Page 165 and 166:
Figure 10.6 Net Margins after All C
- Page 167 and 168:
All other variables in the budgets
- Page 169 and 170:
Table 10.2Summary of Average Yield
- Page 171 and 172:
■■■■impression is given tha
- Page 173:
were based on a 2005 cotton farmer
- Page 176 and 177:
more recent data are not available
- Page 178 and 179:
Figure 11.1 Estimated Average Ginni
- Page 180 and 181:
to buy seed cotton immediately afte
- Page 182 and 183:
146Table 11.3 Overall Competitivene
- Page 184 and 185:
148Table 11.4 Total Value Added per
- Page 186 and 187:
Figure 11.3 Total Value Added per c
- Page 189 and 190:
CHAPTER TWELVEConclusionsPatrick La
- Page 191 and 192:
Table 12.1 Summary of Expected and
- Page 193 and 194:
Valorization ofby-productsValue of
- Page 195 and 196:
Macro impact■ Total value addedpe
- Page 197 and 198:
across concession zones, with newer
- Page 199 and 200:
high yields. However, a mixed pictu
- Page 201 and 202:
governance and regulatory structure
- Page 203 and 204:
against price and exchange rate ris
- Page 205 and 206:
Improvements in the Delivery of Ext
- Page 207 and 208:
esistant, “stacked” genes), and
- Page 209 and 210:
Just as improved sector management
- Page 211 and 212:
More-competitive systems are perhap
- Page 213 and 214:
■■■■Interprofessional commi
- Page 215 and 216:
were to occur, it would most likely
- Page 217 and 218:
APPENDIX AStatistical Tables181
- Page 219 and 220:
1989/90 43 111 383 40.7 95 0.491990
- Page 221 and 222:
1989/90 62 150 416 41.0 95 0.671990
- Page 223 and 224:
1989/90 43 89 482 41.3 95 0.651990/
- Page 225 and 226:
1989/90 99 189 521 42.8 85 0.541990
- Page 227 and 228:
1997/98 31 327 95 33 to 35 2,950 83
- Page 229 and 230:
1994/95 82 344 238 33 207.0 40.0119
- Page 231 and 232:
Table A8 ZambiaSeasonLint productio
- Page 233 and 234:
Table A9 ZimbabweSeasonLint product
- Page 235 and 236:
Table A10 Ginning and FOB-to-CIF Co
- Page 237 and 238:
1997/98 1.64 598 210 75 49 74 7.619
- Page 239:
1987/88 17,609 31,238 564 414 911 4
- Page 242 and 243:
206 NOTES11. Important cotton secto
- Page 244 and 245:
208 NOTES47. Benin is not included
- Page 246 and 247:
210 NOTES79. In Zimbabwe and Zambia
- Page 249 and 250:
BIBLIOGRAPHYBadiane, Ousmane, Dhane
- Page 251 and 252:
and Instability, ed. A. Sarris and
- Page 253:
World Bank. 2007. Strategies for Co
- Page 256 and 257:
CFA exchange rate, 17-18b, 19fcompa
- Page 258 and 259:
input credit and extension in, 77-8
- Page 260 and 261:
firm types, 211n93fixed prices, for
- Page 262 and 263:
productivity, 119, 121f, 205n8,209n
- Page 264 and 265:
key indicators, 56-58, 57-58t,155-5
- Page 266 and 267:
focus group discussions by farmerty
- Page 268 and 269:
technology transfer, 170-71by typol
- Page 270:
ECO-AUDITEnvironmental Benefits Sta