focus group discussions by farmertype, methodology for, 134,135–36historical background <strong>and</strong> recentevolution <strong>of</strong> cotton sector <strong>in</strong>,38–43<strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong> study, xxv, 6, 7f<strong>in</strong>put credit <strong>and</strong> extension <strong>in</strong>,76–77, 84t<strong>in</strong>put supply problem <strong>in</strong>, 205n3macroeconomic impact <strong>of</strong> cottonsector <strong>in</strong>, 148–49t, 150f, 151tmarket<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> cotton from, 25oil <strong>and</strong> cake markets, 26, 27t, 98t,99–103overall competitiveness, 145,146f, 163passbook system, 77, 128performance <strong>and</strong> behavior factorsbeyond structure, 59–60bperformance <strong>and</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> sector,l<strong>in</strong>k between, xxvii–xxx, 154,161–64prices <strong>and</strong> pric<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong>, 68–71,69t, 70tproductivity, 120f, 121f, 122quality control <strong>in</strong>, 89t, 90, 93–95,94–95b, 96, 166, 208n61,210n86reform challenges <strong>in</strong>, xxxivreform efforts <strong>in</strong>, xxivresearch <strong>in</strong>, 107–10, 108treturns to farmers, 123f, 124–26t,127–32, 129f, 133t, 209n76Sav<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>and</strong> Credit Cooperatives, 179statistical tables, 192–93tsusta<strong>in</strong>ability, governance, <strong>and</strong>management <strong>of</strong> cotton sector,improv<strong>in</strong>g, 173<strong>in</strong> typology <strong>of</strong> SSA cotton sector, xxv,xxvif, 46, 48–49, 48f, 53,59–60b, 65, 179–80tariff protections on edible oils,101, 103technology transfer, 170–71Thail<strong>and</strong>, 14Togo, 17btoll g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, 100btransaction cost economics, 99Tschirley, David, 3, 45, 65, 73, 87, 153Turkey, 12, 14, 50bTurkmenistan, 50btypology <strong>of</strong> firms, 211n93typology <strong>of</strong> SSA cotton sectors,xxv–xxvii, 45–61. See alsocompetitive market systems;concentrated market systems;hybrid systems; localmonopolies; nationalmonopoliescompany cost efficiency by, 140, 141tcoord<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> competition,46–49decision tree for, 46fdynamism <strong>in</strong>, 48f, 49, 79–80b,174–75global applicability <strong>of</strong>, 50–51bimportance <strong>of</strong>, 153–54<strong>in</strong>put credit <strong>and</strong> extension affectedby. See under <strong>in</strong>put credit <strong>and</strong>extensionlocation <strong>of</strong> countries with<strong>in</strong>,xxvif, 48fmarket-based versus regulatedsectors, 45–46, 46foil <strong>and</strong> cake marketsoverall country typologies <strong>and</strong>,57–58t, 60–61structure <strong>and</strong> organization <strong>of</strong>,97–101, 98toverall competitiveness <strong>of</strong>,145–47, 146tpath dependency <strong>in</strong> sector structure,154, 175, 210n83performance <strong>and</strong> behavior factorsbeyond structure, 59–60bperformance <strong>and</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> sector,l<strong>in</strong>k between, xxvii–xxx,54–58, 55f, 57–58t, 154,161–64predicted strengths <strong>and</strong> weaknesses<strong>of</strong> different types, 51–53, 52tproductivity <strong>and</strong>, 122quality control <strong>and</strong>, 87, 88–89t,92–96, 94–95breform efforts <strong>and</strong>, xxxii–xxxiv230 INDEX
esearch <strong>and</strong>, 108–11returns to farmers <strong>and</strong>, 122,132, 133tsusta<strong>in</strong>ability <strong>and</strong> competitiveness,structure as key factor <strong>in</strong>,xxxi–xxxiiway forward by, 174–80Ug<strong>and</strong>acompany cost efficiency <strong>in</strong>, 140, 141t,142f, 143f, 144–45, 162historical background <strong>and</strong> recentevolution <strong>of</strong> cotton sector <strong>in</strong>,38–43<strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong> study, xxv, 6, 7f<strong>in</strong>put credit <strong>and</strong> extension <strong>in</strong>, 76–77,81, 84tmacroeconomic impact <strong>of</strong> cottonsector <strong>in</strong>, 148–49t,150f, 151tmarket<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> cotton from, 25oil <strong>and</strong> cake markets, 27t, 98t,102, 103overall competitiveness, 145,146f, 163performance <strong>and</strong> behavior factorsbeyond structure, 59–60bperformance <strong>and</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> sector,l<strong>in</strong>k between, xxvii–xxviii,xxx, 154, 161, 162, 163prices <strong>and</strong> pric<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong>, 68–71,69t, 70tproductivity, 120f, 121f, 122,209n74quality control <strong>in</strong>, 89t, 95reform efforts <strong>in</strong>, xxivresearch <strong>in</strong>, 106, 107, 108treturns to farmers, 123f, 124–26t,127, 128, 129f, 132, 133t,209n75statistical tables, 194tsusta<strong>in</strong>ability, governance, <strong>and</strong>management <strong>of</strong> cotton sector,improv<strong>in</strong>g, 172<strong>in</strong> typology <strong>of</strong> SSA cotton sector, xxv,xxvif, xxvii, 48, 48f, 49, 53,59–60b, 65, 179–80, 208n49UK91, 110Union Nationale des Producteurs deCoton du Burk<strong>in</strong>a (UNPCB),34, 76United K<strong>in</strong>gdom, 106United Statesas consumer <strong>of</strong> cotton, 14dollar strength/weakness <strong>and</strong> cottonprices, 16–19, 19f, 153farmer associations <strong>in</strong>, 50bpolicy shifts <strong>in</strong>, 15production <strong>of</strong> cotton <strong>in</strong>, 12–14seed prices <strong>in</strong>, 101subsidies to cotton farmers <strong>in</strong>, 3–4,19, 20b, 21support for cotton <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong>,206n14UNPCB (Union Nationale desProducteurs de Coton duBurk<strong>in</strong>a), 34, 76upl<strong>and</strong> cotton (Gossypium hirsutum),22URECOS-CI, 50bU.S. Agency for InternationalDevelopment (USAid), 77Uzbekistan, 50bvalorization <strong>of</strong> seed cotton byproducts.See oil <strong>and</strong> cake marketsVictoria Federation <strong>of</strong> CooperativeUnions, 39WAEMU (West <strong>Africa</strong>n Economic <strong>and</strong>Monetary Union), 17bway forward for SSA cotton sectors,164–80efficiency <strong>of</strong> g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries, 171<strong>in</strong>put credit <strong>and</strong> extension, 169,179–80market<strong>in</strong>g practices <strong>and</strong> strategies,166–67oil <strong>and</strong> cake markets, 167–68prices <strong>and</strong> pric<strong>in</strong>g systems, 176productivity at farm level, 168quality control, 165–66research, 170susta<strong>in</strong>ability, governance, <strong>and</strong>management, improv<strong>in</strong>g,172–73INDEX 231
- Page 1:
AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENTOr
- Page 4 and 5:
AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENTSe
- Page 6 and 7:
© 2009 The International Bank for
- Page 8 and 9:
Section II. Historical Background a
- Page 11 and 12:
BOXES, FIGURES, AND TABLESBoxes2.1
- Page 13:
5.2 Summary of Pricing Mechanisms i
- Page 16 and 17:
eference are limited to neighboring
- Page 19 and 20:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis study was carri
- Page 21 and 22:
ABBREVIATIONS¢ U.S. centACPAgricul
- Page 23:
US$U shWAEMUWCAWTOU.S. dollarUganda
- Page 26 and 27:
output markets, improving productiv
- Page 28 and 29:
etween these competing needs, provi
- Page 30 and 31:
■■■■■competition increase
- Page 32 and 33:
monopolies range from 0.98 to 1.15,
- Page 34 and 35:
macroeconomics, developments in com
- Page 36 and 37:
central body and that the state nee
- Page 39 and 40:
CHAPTER ONEIntroductionDavid Tschir
- Page 41 and 42:
The debate about how to deal with t
- Page 43 and 44:
Figure 1.1 Map of Africa Highlighti
- Page 45:
hypotheses about sector performance
- Page 48 and 49:
to reach 25 million tons of lint in
- Page 50 and 51:
cotton production was introduced in
- Page 52 and 53:
Figure 2.2 Nominal Cotton Prices (U
- Page 54 and 55:
Box 2.1 (Continued)Togo, 39 percent
- Page 56 and 57:
Box 2.2 Cotton SubsidiesCotton subs
- Page 58 and 59:
efers specifically to the presence
- Page 60 and 61:
picking, storage, handling, or tran
- Page 62 and 63:
national monopoly (state-owned or p
- Page 65:
SECTION TWOHistorical Background an
- Page 68 and 69:
shares belonging to governments, an
- Page 70 and 71:
Changes Made Since the End of the 1
- Page 72 and 73:
long-term development strategies, (
- Page 74 and 75:
possible link between price-setting
- Page 76 and 77:
production fell further, to lows of
- Page 78 and 79:
all aspects of the chain from input
- Page 80 and 81:
suggestions (a) of establishing fas
- Page 82 and 83:
Figure 4.1 Decision Tree for Cotton
- Page 84 and 85:
Figure 4.2 African Cotton Sector Ty
- Page 86 and 87:
Box 4.1 Is This Typology Specific t
- Page 88 and 89:
52Table 4.1 Trading Off: Strengths
- Page 90 and 91:
CONCEPTUALIZATION OF THE LINKS BETW
- Page 92 and 93:
chosen in this book and the impact
- Page 94 and 95:
Table 4.3 Expected Performance alon
- Page 96 and 97:
Box 4.2 (Continued)Second, farmers
- Page 99:
SECTION THREEComparative Analysis:C
- Page 102 and 103:
PRICING MECHANISMS IN WCAPricing me
- Page 104 and 105:
efore planting, price risk in the s
- Page 106 and 107:
Table 5.3 Summary of Producer Share
- Page 108 and 109:
Finally, FOT price shares in WCA ro
- Page 110 and 111:
MALI AND CAMEROON: GOVERNMENT MONOP
- Page 112 and 113:
Significant in Mozambique, the comp
- Page 114 and 115:
Zimbabwe transitioned during the 19
- Page 116 and 117:
Box 6.1 (Continued)A move from a co
- Page 118 and 119:
82Table 6.1 Summary of Input Supply
- Page 120 and 121:
84Table 6.1 (Continued)IndicatorsCo
- Page 123 and 124:
CHAPTER SEVENQuality ControlGérald
- Page 125 and 126:
Tanzania Competitive 1 2 Very lax n
- Page 127 and 128:
Figure 7.1 Estimated Premium for To
- Page 129 and 130:
all fiber coming from Africa—are
- Page 131 and 132:
Box 7.1 (Continued)newly liberalize
- Page 133 and 134:
CHAPTER EIGHTValorization of SeedCo
- Page 135 and 136:
competitive market in some of the o
- Page 137 and 138:
a few years, it indicates that some
- Page 139 and 140:
should eventually make a difference
- Page 141 and 142:
CHAPTER NINECotton ResearchDuncan B
- Page 143 and 144:
With regard to human and financial
- Page 145 and 146:
■■■Be involved in setting res
- Page 147 and 148:
made royalty payments to CRI. When
- Page 149:
and to identify complementary inves
- Page 153 and 154:
CHAPTER TENYields and Returns toFar
- Page 155 and 156:
fact that 55 percent of cotton is p
- Page 157 and 158:
Yields by Farmer TypeTo assess perf
- Page 159 and 160:
Factors beyond company services als
- Page 161 and 162:
Table 10.1 Summary Crop Budgets by
- Page 163 and 164:
According to the focus group inform
- Page 165 and 166:
Figure 10.6 Net Margins after All C
- Page 167 and 168:
All other variables in the budgets
- Page 169 and 170:
Table 10.2Summary of Average Yield
- Page 171 and 172:
■■■■impression is given tha
- Page 173:
were based on a 2005 cotton farmer
- Page 176 and 177:
more recent data are not available
- Page 178 and 179:
Figure 11.1 Estimated Average Ginni
- Page 180 and 181:
to buy seed cotton immediately afte
- Page 182 and 183:
146Table 11.3 Overall Competitivene
- Page 184 and 185:
148Table 11.4 Total Value Added per
- Page 186 and 187:
Figure 11.3 Total Value Added per c
- Page 189 and 190:
CHAPTER TWELVEConclusionsPatrick La
- Page 191 and 192:
Table 12.1 Summary of Expected and
- Page 193 and 194:
Valorization ofby-productsValue of
- Page 195 and 196:
Macro impact■ Total value addedpe
- Page 197 and 198:
across concession zones, with newer
- Page 199 and 200:
high yields. However, a mixed pictu
- Page 201 and 202:
governance and regulatory structure
- Page 203 and 204:
against price and exchange rate ris
- Page 205 and 206:
Improvements in the Delivery of Ext
- Page 207 and 208:
esistant, “stacked” genes), and
- Page 209 and 210:
Just as improved sector management
- Page 211 and 212:
More-competitive systems are perhap
- Page 213 and 214:
■■■■Interprofessional commi
- Page 215 and 216: were to occur, it would most likely
- Page 217 and 218: APPENDIX AStatistical Tables181
- Page 219 and 220: 1989/90 43 111 383 40.7 95 0.491990
- Page 221 and 222: 1989/90 62 150 416 41.0 95 0.671990
- Page 223 and 224: 1989/90 43 89 482 41.3 95 0.651990/
- Page 225 and 226: 1989/90 99 189 521 42.8 85 0.541990
- Page 227 and 228: 1997/98 31 327 95 33 to 35 2,950 83
- Page 229 and 230: 1994/95 82 344 238 33 207.0 40.0119
- Page 231 and 232: Table A8 ZambiaSeasonLint productio
- Page 233 and 234: Table A9 ZimbabweSeasonLint product
- Page 235 and 236: Table A10 Ginning and FOB-to-CIF Co
- Page 237 and 238: 1997/98 1.64 598 210 75 49 74 7.619
- Page 239: 1987/88 17,609 31,238 564 414 911 4
- Page 242 and 243: 206 NOTES11. Important cotton secto
- Page 244 and 245: 208 NOTES47. Benin is not included
- Page 246 and 247: 210 NOTES79. In Zimbabwe and Zambia
- Page 249 and 250: BIBLIOGRAPHYBadiane, Ousmane, Dhane
- Page 251 and 252: and Instability, ed. A. Sarris and
- Page 253: World Bank. 2007. Strategies for Co
- Page 256 and 257: CFA exchange rate, 17-18b, 19fcompa
- Page 258 and 259: input credit and extension in, 77-8
- Page 260 and 261: firm types, 211n93fixed prices, for
- Page 262 and 263: productivity, 119, 121f, 205n8,209n
- Page 264 and 265: key indicators, 56-58, 57-58t,155-5
- Page 268 and 269: technology transfer, 170-71by typol
- Page 270: ECO-AUDITEnvironmental Benefits Sta