productivity, 119, 121f, 205n8,209n71quality control <strong>in</strong>, 88t, 90, 92–93research <strong>in</strong>, 106, 108t, 161returns to farmers, 123f, 124–26t,127–31, 129f, 133tseeds, sale <strong>of</strong>, 207n27s<strong>in</strong>gle-channel system, advantages<strong>and</strong> drawbacks <strong>of</strong>, 4statistical tables, 188–89ton subsidies to cotton farmers,4, 21<strong>in</strong> typology <strong>of</strong> SSA cotton sector, xxv,xxvif, 48f, 49, 53, 175management <strong>of</strong> SSA cotton sectors,improv<strong>in</strong>g, 172–73market for cotton, 11–27competition with<strong>in</strong> a produc<strong>in</strong>gcountry, 25–26dem<strong>and</strong> side, 14external factors affect<strong>in</strong>g, 15–21forward sales contracts, 25, 167GM versus organic cotton, 12–14<strong>in</strong>ternational market. See<strong>in</strong>ternational cotton marketoil <strong>and</strong> cake. See oil <strong>and</strong> cake marketspric<strong>in</strong>g. See prices <strong>and</strong> pric<strong>in</strong>gsystemsquality requirements, 21–24, 23tseed market, 26, 207n27–28strategies for market<strong>in</strong>g, 24–26,166–67supply side, 11–14, 13tsynthetic fibers, competition from,14, 21market systems, cotton sectors with,45–46. See also competitivemarket systems; concentratedmarket systemscompany cost efficiency <strong>in</strong>, 141t, 144decision tree for, 46fdynamism <strong>in</strong>, 49Mexico, 101monopolies with s<strong>in</strong>gle-channelmarket<strong>in</strong>g systems, 45–46. Seealso local monopolies; nationalmonopoliesadvantages <strong>and</strong> drawbacks <strong>of</strong>, 4–6company cost efficiency <strong>in</strong>, 140, 141t,142–44decision tree for, 45–46dynamism <strong>in</strong>, 49historical development <strong>and</strong> recentevolution <strong>of</strong>, 31–38oil <strong>and</strong> cake markets, 97overall competitiveness, 145, 146f,147, 162–63research <strong>and</strong>, 109returns to farmers <strong>in</strong>, 132, 133tsusta<strong>in</strong>ability, governance, <strong>and</strong>management <strong>of</strong>, 172<strong>in</strong> WCA, 4–6, 31–34, 65, 74, 145–47,160–64, 172monopsony, 45, 103, 161Monsanto, 171Mozambiquecompany cost efficiency <strong>in</strong>, 139, 140,141t, 142f, 143f, 144, 209n78,210n81focus group discussions by farmertype, methodology for, 134,135, 136–37historical background <strong>and</strong> recentevolution <strong>of</strong> cotton sector <strong>in</strong>,38–41, 43<strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong> study, xxv, 6, 7f<strong>in</strong>put credit <strong>and</strong> extension <strong>in</strong>, 73,75–76, 78, 81, 83tmacroeconomic impact <strong>of</strong> cottonsector <strong>in</strong>, 148–49t, 150f, 151toil <strong>and</strong> cake markets, 27t, 97, 98t, 99overall competitiveness, 145, 146f,147, 163performance <strong>and</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> sector,l<strong>in</strong>k between, xxx,160–61, 162prices <strong>and</strong> pric<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong>, 68–71,69t, 70tproductivity, 120f, 121f, 209n72,209n73quality control <strong>in</strong>, 88t, 90, 96reform challenges <strong>in</strong>, xxxiiiresearch <strong>in</strong>, 107–9, 108t, 112returns to farmers, 123f, 124–26t,127, 128, 129f, 131, 132, 133t,162, 163, 209n75226 INDEX
seed export market, 207n28statistical tables, 190–91tsusta<strong>in</strong>ability, governance, <strong>and</strong>management <strong>of</strong> cotton sector,improv<strong>in</strong>g, 172<strong>in</strong> typology <strong>of</strong> SSA cotton sector, xxv,xxvif, 48f, 53, 65, 176, 177Multi-Fiber Agreement, 14National <strong>Cotton</strong> Council (NCC),Zimbabwe, 99, 208n62national monopolies, 45, 175–77. Seealso Cameroon; Malicompany cost efficiency <strong>in</strong>, 141t,142–45, 162coord<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> competition <strong>in</strong>, 47<strong>in</strong> decision tree <strong>of</strong> typologies, 46fdynamism <strong>in</strong>, 49expected FOT shares, 65expected performance along key<strong>in</strong>dicators, 58t<strong>in</strong>put credit <strong>and</strong> extension <strong>in</strong>,74–75, 81<strong>in</strong>ternational applicability <strong>of</strong>typology, 50boverall competitiveness, 145–47, 146fperformance <strong>and</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> sector,l<strong>in</strong>k between, 154, 160–63predicted strengths <strong>and</strong> weaknesses,51–53, 52tproductivity <strong>and</strong>, 122quality control <strong>in</strong>, 87, 88–89t,92–93, 96returns to farmers, 133tsusta<strong>in</strong>ability, governance, <strong>and</strong>management <strong>of</strong>, 172–73way forward for, 175–77NCC (National <strong>Cotton</strong> Council),Zimbabwe, 99, 208n62Niger, 17bNigeria, 94–95bNyanza Cooperative Union, 39OECD (Organisation for EconomicCo-operation <strong>and</strong>Development), xiv, xxiv, 16, 153oil <strong>and</strong> cake markets, 97–104conclusions regard<strong>in</strong>g, 103–4domestic markets, 27t<strong>in</strong>ternational market, 26–27as performance <strong>in</strong>dicators, 57–58t, 61performance <strong>of</strong>, 101–3, 157t, 161prices, 101–3structure <strong>and</strong> organization <strong>of</strong>,97–101, 98ttariff protections on edible oils,101, 103typology <strong>of</strong> SSA cotton sectors <strong>and</strong>,57–58t, 60–61vertical <strong>in</strong>tegration with cottong<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry, 99–100way forward for, 167–68on call pric<strong>in</strong>g, 25, 167OPPC (Organisation des Producteursde Coton du Cameroun), 34, 74organic cotton market, 12–14organic fertilizer, use <strong>of</strong>, 108Organisation des Producteurs de Cotondu Cameroun (OPPC), 34, 74Organisation for EconomicCo-operation <strong>and</strong> Development(OECD), xiv, xxiv, 16, 153organization. See structure <strong>and</strong>organizationoutgrower schemes, 5overall competitiveness <strong>of</strong> SSA cottonsectors, 145–47, 146f, 162–63Pakistan, 12, 14, 120passbook system, Tanzania, 77, 128path dependency <strong>in</strong> sector structure,154, 175, 210n83performance contracts, 32–33performance <strong>of</strong> SSA cotton sectors,154–64company performance <strong>and</strong> costefficiency, 139–45, 141t, 142f,143t, 144f, 157t, 162competitiveness <strong>and</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ability,structure as key factor <strong>in</strong>,xxxi–xxxiiexpected versus realized performanceacross key <strong>in</strong>dicators, 155–59t<strong>in</strong>put credit <strong>and</strong> extension acrosssector types, 81–85, 82–84t,156t, 160INDEX 227
- Page 1:
AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENTOr
- Page 4 and 5:
AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENTSe
- Page 6 and 7:
© 2009 The International Bank for
- Page 8 and 9:
Section II. Historical Background a
- Page 11 and 12:
BOXES, FIGURES, AND TABLESBoxes2.1
- Page 13:
5.2 Summary of Pricing Mechanisms i
- Page 16 and 17:
eference are limited to neighboring
- Page 19 and 20:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis study was carri
- Page 21 and 22:
ABBREVIATIONS¢ U.S. centACPAgricul
- Page 23:
US$U shWAEMUWCAWTOU.S. dollarUganda
- Page 26 and 27:
output markets, improving productiv
- Page 28 and 29:
etween these competing needs, provi
- Page 30 and 31:
■■■■■competition increase
- Page 32 and 33:
monopolies range from 0.98 to 1.15,
- Page 34 and 35:
macroeconomics, developments in com
- Page 36 and 37:
central body and that the state nee
- Page 39 and 40:
CHAPTER ONEIntroductionDavid Tschir
- Page 41 and 42:
The debate about how to deal with t
- Page 43 and 44:
Figure 1.1 Map of Africa Highlighti
- Page 45:
hypotheses about sector performance
- Page 48 and 49:
to reach 25 million tons of lint in
- Page 50 and 51:
cotton production was introduced in
- Page 52 and 53:
Figure 2.2 Nominal Cotton Prices (U
- Page 54 and 55:
Box 2.1 (Continued)Togo, 39 percent
- Page 56 and 57:
Box 2.2 Cotton SubsidiesCotton subs
- Page 58 and 59:
efers specifically to the presence
- Page 60 and 61:
picking, storage, handling, or tran
- Page 62 and 63:
national monopoly (state-owned or p
- Page 65:
SECTION TWOHistorical Background an
- Page 68 and 69:
shares belonging to governments, an
- Page 70 and 71:
Changes Made Since the End of the 1
- Page 72 and 73:
long-term development strategies, (
- Page 74 and 75:
possible link between price-setting
- Page 76 and 77:
production fell further, to lows of
- Page 78 and 79:
all aspects of the chain from input
- Page 80 and 81:
suggestions (a) of establishing fas
- Page 82 and 83:
Figure 4.1 Decision Tree for Cotton
- Page 84 and 85:
Figure 4.2 African Cotton Sector Ty
- Page 86 and 87:
Box 4.1 Is This Typology Specific t
- Page 88 and 89:
52Table 4.1 Trading Off: Strengths
- Page 90 and 91:
CONCEPTUALIZATION OF THE LINKS BETW
- Page 92 and 93:
chosen in this book and the impact
- Page 94 and 95:
Table 4.3 Expected Performance alon
- Page 96 and 97:
Box 4.2 (Continued)Second, farmers
- Page 99:
SECTION THREEComparative Analysis:C
- Page 102 and 103:
PRICING MECHANISMS IN WCAPricing me
- Page 104 and 105:
efore planting, price risk in the s
- Page 106 and 107:
Table 5.3 Summary of Producer Share
- Page 108 and 109:
Finally, FOT price shares in WCA ro
- Page 110 and 111:
MALI AND CAMEROON: GOVERNMENT MONOP
- Page 112 and 113:
Significant in Mozambique, the comp
- Page 114 and 115:
Zimbabwe transitioned during the 19
- Page 116 and 117:
Box 6.1 (Continued)A move from a co
- Page 118 and 119:
82Table 6.1 Summary of Input Supply
- Page 120 and 121:
84Table 6.1 (Continued)IndicatorsCo
- Page 123 and 124:
CHAPTER SEVENQuality ControlGérald
- Page 125 and 126:
Tanzania Competitive 1 2 Very lax n
- Page 127 and 128:
Figure 7.1 Estimated Premium for To
- Page 129 and 130:
all fiber coming from Africa—are
- Page 131 and 132:
Box 7.1 (Continued)newly liberalize
- Page 133 and 134:
CHAPTER EIGHTValorization of SeedCo
- Page 135 and 136:
competitive market in some of the o
- Page 137 and 138:
a few years, it indicates that some
- Page 139 and 140:
should eventually make a difference
- Page 141 and 142:
CHAPTER NINECotton ResearchDuncan B
- Page 143 and 144:
With regard to human and financial
- Page 145 and 146:
■■■Be involved in setting res
- Page 147 and 148:
made royalty payments to CRI. When
- Page 149:
and to identify complementary inves
- Page 153 and 154:
CHAPTER TENYields and Returns toFar
- Page 155 and 156:
fact that 55 percent of cotton is p
- Page 157 and 158:
Yields by Farmer TypeTo assess perf
- Page 159 and 160:
Factors beyond company services als
- Page 161 and 162:
Table 10.1 Summary Crop Budgets by
- Page 163 and 164:
According to the focus group inform
- Page 165 and 166:
Figure 10.6 Net Margins after All C
- Page 167 and 168:
All other variables in the budgets
- Page 169 and 170:
Table 10.2Summary of Average Yield
- Page 171 and 172:
■■■■impression is given tha
- Page 173:
were based on a 2005 cotton farmer
- Page 176 and 177:
more recent data are not available
- Page 178 and 179:
Figure 11.1 Estimated Average Ginni
- Page 180 and 181:
to buy seed cotton immediately afte
- Page 182 and 183:
146Table 11.3 Overall Competitivene
- Page 184 and 185:
148Table 11.4 Total Value Added per
- Page 186 and 187:
Figure 11.3 Total Value Added per c
- Page 189 and 190:
CHAPTER TWELVEConclusionsPatrick La
- Page 191 and 192:
Table 12.1 Summary of Expected and
- Page 193 and 194:
Valorization ofby-productsValue of
- Page 195 and 196:
Macro impact■ Total value addedpe
- Page 197 and 198:
across concession zones, with newer
- Page 199 and 200:
high yields. However, a mixed pictu
- Page 201 and 202:
governance and regulatory structure
- Page 203 and 204:
against price and exchange rate ris
- Page 205 and 206:
Improvements in the Delivery of Ext
- Page 207 and 208:
esistant, “stacked” genes), and
- Page 209 and 210:
Just as improved sector management
- Page 211 and 212: More-competitive systems are perhap
- Page 213 and 214: ■■■■Interprofessional commi
- Page 215 and 216: were to occur, it would most likely
- Page 217 and 218: APPENDIX AStatistical Tables181
- Page 219 and 220: 1989/90 43 111 383 40.7 95 0.491990
- Page 221 and 222: 1989/90 62 150 416 41.0 95 0.671990
- Page 223 and 224: 1989/90 43 89 482 41.3 95 0.651990/
- Page 225 and 226: 1989/90 99 189 521 42.8 85 0.541990
- Page 227 and 228: 1997/98 31 327 95 33 to 35 2,950 83
- Page 229 and 230: 1994/95 82 344 238 33 207.0 40.0119
- Page 231 and 232: Table A8 ZambiaSeasonLint productio
- Page 233 and 234: Table A9 ZimbabweSeasonLint product
- Page 235 and 236: Table A10 Ginning and FOB-to-CIF Co
- Page 237 and 238: 1997/98 1.64 598 210 75 49 74 7.619
- Page 239: 1987/88 17,609 31,238 564 414 911 4
- Page 242 and 243: 206 NOTES11. Important cotton secto
- Page 244 and 245: 208 NOTES47. Benin is not included
- Page 246 and 247: 210 NOTES79. In Zimbabwe and Zambia
- Page 249 and 250: BIBLIOGRAPHYBadiane, Ousmane, Dhane
- Page 251 and 252: and Instability, ed. A. Sarris and
- Page 253: World Bank. 2007. Strategies for Co
- Page 256 and 257: CFA exchange rate, 17-18b, 19fcompa
- Page 258 and 259: input credit and extension in, 77-8
- Page 260 and 261: firm types, 211n93fixed prices, for
- Page 264 and 265: key indicators, 56-58, 57-58t,155-5
- Page 266 and 267: focus group discussions by farmerty
- Page 268 and 269: technology transfer, 170-71by typol
- Page 270: ECO-AUDITEnvironmental Benefits Sta