12.07.2015 Views

Organization and Performance of Cotton Sectors in Africa ... - infoDev

Organization and Performance of Cotton Sectors in Africa ... - infoDev

Organization and Performance of Cotton Sectors in Africa ... - infoDev

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

governance <strong>and</strong> regulatory structures <strong>and</strong> management systems. Some <strong>of</strong> theactions discussed next could be usefully tackled at a regional level, as well asnationally, <strong>and</strong> may benefit from donor support.Achiev<strong>in</strong>g Greater ValueEfforts to achieve greater value <strong>in</strong> SSA cotton sectors should focus on three priorityareas: quality, market<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> valorization <strong>of</strong> by-products.Quality<strong>Africa</strong>n cotton has two potential competitive advantages <strong>in</strong> the world market:the <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic quality <strong>of</strong> its fiber (the fiber properties) <strong>and</strong> the fact that it ish<strong>and</strong>picked. Quality improvement—especially the elim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> contam<strong>in</strong>ation—couldresult <strong>in</strong> sell<strong>in</strong>g prices <strong>of</strong> up to US$0.10 per pound above the CotlookA Index. At typical producer prices <strong>of</strong> US$0.25–US$0.32 per kg, a US$0.10per lb <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the price <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>t that is fully passed on to farmers would<strong>in</strong>crease farmer prices by 30 to 40 percent. As a result, quality managementshould be considered one <strong>of</strong> the most important areas <strong>of</strong> improvement for SSAcotton export<strong>in</strong>g countries.Though most <strong>Africa</strong>n cotton is suitable for the medium-high level <strong>of</strong> r<strong>in</strong>gsp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, progress on quality s<strong>in</strong>ce the mid-1990s has generally been disappo<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g<strong>and</strong> certa<strong>in</strong>ly not improv<strong>in</strong>g as fast as required by the sp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry.The trend <strong>in</strong> sp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g technology toward more automation <strong>and</strong> higherspeeds makes improvements <strong>in</strong> quality <strong>and</strong> consistency a vital issue for thefuture <strong>of</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n cotton. Yet the quality reputation <strong>of</strong> many <strong>Africa</strong>n l<strong>in</strong>ts hasbeen eroded, primarily by contam<strong>in</strong>ation from foreign matter. Meanwhile, theimpact <strong>of</strong> quality on cotton pric<strong>in</strong>g is not fully understood by producers, evenby some smaller g<strong>in</strong>ners.Greater awareness may be necessary to reestablish <strong>Africa</strong>’s ma<strong>in</strong> comparativeadvantage stemm<strong>in</strong>g from the manual harvest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> seed cotton. However,Zimbabwe’s experience s<strong>in</strong>ce 2003 clearly illustrates that awareness alone is notenough. The Zimbabwe cotton sector enjoyed a strong quality reputation on<strong>in</strong>ternational markets, which the dom<strong>in</strong>ant firms were keen to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>, <strong>and</strong>farmers were discipl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> grad<strong>in</strong>g their seed cotton before sale. However,when new entrants began <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>g flat-rate prices irrespective <strong>of</strong> quality <strong>in</strong>2003, farmer behavior changed with<strong>in</strong> a season, <strong>and</strong> the average quality <strong>of</strong> seedcotton delivered to buy<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts plummeted. Indeed, a central <strong>in</strong>sight fromthis study is that sector structure has an impact on both the <strong>in</strong>centives that g<strong>in</strong>nershave to produce high quality l<strong>in</strong>t <strong>and</strong> on their ability to control their supplycha<strong>in</strong> to achieve it. Technical solutions to elim<strong>in</strong>ate contam<strong>in</strong>ation are wellknown, but some form <strong>of</strong> coord<strong>in</strong>ation across firms is necessary if such solutionsare to be implemented effectively. 85Quality improvement <strong>in</strong> SSA requires a concerted effort from researchers,farmers, <strong>and</strong> g<strong>in</strong>ners if they are to improve fiber characteristics throughCONCLUSIONS 165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!