Organization and Performance of Cotton Sectors in Africa ... - infoDev
Organization and Performance of Cotton Sectors in Africa ... - infoDev
Organization and Performance of Cotton Sectors in Africa ... - infoDev
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
eference are limited to neighbor<strong>in</strong>g countries. At a time when the design <strong>of</strong>cotton sector reform programs has become extremely complex <strong>and</strong> potentiallyrisky, stronger <strong>and</strong> broader analysis, draw<strong>in</strong>g on a broader array <strong>of</strong> empiricalevidence, <strong>and</strong> reflect<strong>in</strong>g strategically on potential options, would be very usefulfor policy makers. The lack <strong>of</strong> such analysis, especially <strong>of</strong> the reform optionsavailable <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> their possible implications, partly expla<strong>in</strong>s the reluctance <strong>of</strong>many governments to engage <strong>in</strong> ambitious restructur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> their cotton sectors.Therefore, the ma<strong>in</strong> objective <strong>of</strong> this study is to provide an <strong>in</strong>-depth <strong>and</strong>comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> the reforms that have been implemented by SSA cottonsectors s<strong>in</strong>ce 1990, <strong>and</strong>, from there, to establish l<strong>in</strong>ks between reforms <strong>and</strong>observable outcomes.The state <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> cotton sector reforms varies widely fromcountry to country. Serious structural reform <strong>of</strong> cotton sectors <strong>in</strong> East <strong>and</strong>Southern <strong>Africa</strong> (ESA) began <strong>in</strong> the mid-1990s. Reform <strong>in</strong> West <strong>and</strong> Central<strong>Africa</strong> (WCA) has been slower, for a complex set <strong>of</strong> reasons related to bothdomestic <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational concerns; among the latter, the case submitted tothe World Trade <strong>Organization</strong> (WTO) by the <strong>Cotton</strong>-4 countries (Ben<strong>in</strong>,Burk<strong>in</strong>a Faso, Chad, <strong>and</strong> Mali) regard<strong>in</strong>g market distortions caused by subsidies<strong>in</strong> Organisation for Economic Co-operation <strong>and</strong> Development (OECD)countries has given a political dimension to the issues <strong>in</strong> the sector, <strong>and</strong> figuresprom<strong>in</strong>ently among the reasons for resistance to reform <strong>in</strong> some countries.Resistance is also due to the perception—genu<strong>in</strong>e or not—that the impact<strong>of</strong> reforms on sector performance, <strong>and</strong> especially on small farmers, has been atbest mixed. A number <strong>of</strong> West <strong>Africa</strong>n leaders <strong>and</strong> policy makers strongly feelthat the reforms are likely to create major social problems, <strong>and</strong> the results <strong>in</strong>countries that have implemented reforms, particularly <strong>in</strong> ESA, do not make astrong case for privatization <strong>and</strong> liberalization <strong>of</strong> the cotton sectors. Given thecomplexities <strong>of</strong> reform programs <strong>and</strong> the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>and</strong> fluctuations <strong>in</strong> theworld cotton market, it is also difficult to establish clear causal l<strong>in</strong>ks betweenstructural changes, risks faced by cotton companies after liberalization, <strong>and</strong>outcomes at the farm <strong>and</strong> sector levels.Abundant literature has been produced <strong>in</strong> recent years on cotton policies <strong>in</strong><strong>Africa</strong>. However, there has been little comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> the actual outcomes<strong>of</strong> cotton sector reforms as measured by growth <strong>and</strong> poverty reduction,<strong>and</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> lessons to be drawn to <strong>in</strong>form future reform processes. Also, onlylimited attempts have been made to br<strong>in</strong>g together, compare, <strong>and</strong> assess reformexperiences from WCA <strong>and</strong> ESA. Bridg<strong>in</strong>g these knowledge gaps <strong>in</strong> an effort tobetter advise governments on cotton sector reform programs <strong>and</strong> policies providesthe fundamental rationale for this study.A number <strong>of</strong> SSA cotton sectors, especially <strong>in</strong> WCA, are currently fac<strong>in</strong>gserious short-term f<strong>in</strong>ancial difficulties. It is important to clarify that the purpose<strong>of</strong> this report is not to provide quick solutions to these short-run problems.Rather, it is to step back, build up a reliable broad assessment <strong>of</strong> cottonsector performance from detailed empirical <strong>in</strong>formation, <strong>and</strong> thereby providexivPREFACE