12.07.2015 Views

Organization and Performance of Cotton Sectors in Africa ... - infoDev

Organization and Performance of Cotton Sectors in Africa ... - infoDev

Organization and Performance of Cotton Sectors in Africa ... - infoDev

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eference are limited to neighbor<strong>in</strong>g countries. At a time when the design <strong>of</strong>cotton sector reform programs has become extremely complex <strong>and</strong> potentiallyrisky, stronger <strong>and</strong> broader analysis, draw<strong>in</strong>g on a broader array <strong>of</strong> empiricalevidence, <strong>and</strong> reflect<strong>in</strong>g strategically on potential options, would be very usefulfor policy makers. The lack <strong>of</strong> such analysis, especially <strong>of</strong> the reform optionsavailable <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> their possible implications, partly expla<strong>in</strong>s the reluctance <strong>of</strong>many governments to engage <strong>in</strong> ambitious restructur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> their cotton sectors.Therefore, the ma<strong>in</strong> objective <strong>of</strong> this study is to provide an <strong>in</strong>-depth <strong>and</strong>comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> the reforms that have been implemented by SSA cottonsectors s<strong>in</strong>ce 1990, <strong>and</strong>, from there, to establish l<strong>in</strong>ks between reforms <strong>and</strong>observable outcomes.The state <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> cotton sector reforms varies widely fromcountry to country. Serious structural reform <strong>of</strong> cotton sectors <strong>in</strong> East <strong>and</strong>Southern <strong>Africa</strong> (ESA) began <strong>in</strong> the mid-1990s. Reform <strong>in</strong> West <strong>and</strong> Central<strong>Africa</strong> (WCA) has been slower, for a complex set <strong>of</strong> reasons related to bothdomestic <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational concerns; among the latter, the case submitted tothe World Trade <strong>Organization</strong> (WTO) by the <strong>Cotton</strong>-4 countries (Ben<strong>in</strong>,Burk<strong>in</strong>a Faso, Chad, <strong>and</strong> Mali) regard<strong>in</strong>g market distortions caused by subsidies<strong>in</strong> Organisation for Economic Co-operation <strong>and</strong> Development (OECD)countries has given a political dimension to the issues <strong>in</strong> the sector, <strong>and</strong> figuresprom<strong>in</strong>ently among the reasons for resistance to reform <strong>in</strong> some countries.Resistance is also due to the perception—genu<strong>in</strong>e or not—that the impact<strong>of</strong> reforms on sector performance, <strong>and</strong> especially on small farmers, has been atbest mixed. A number <strong>of</strong> West <strong>Africa</strong>n leaders <strong>and</strong> policy makers strongly feelthat the reforms are likely to create major social problems, <strong>and</strong> the results <strong>in</strong>countries that have implemented reforms, particularly <strong>in</strong> ESA, do not make astrong case for privatization <strong>and</strong> liberalization <strong>of</strong> the cotton sectors. Given thecomplexities <strong>of</strong> reform programs <strong>and</strong> the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>and</strong> fluctuations <strong>in</strong> theworld cotton market, it is also difficult to establish clear causal l<strong>in</strong>ks betweenstructural changes, risks faced by cotton companies after liberalization, <strong>and</strong>outcomes at the farm <strong>and</strong> sector levels.Abundant literature has been produced <strong>in</strong> recent years on cotton policies <strong>in</strong><strong>Africa</strong>. However, there has been little comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> the actual outcomes<strong>of</strong> cotton sector reforms as measured by growth <strong>and</strong> poverty reduction,<strong>and</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> lessons to be drawn to <strong>in</strong>form future reform processes. Also, onlylimited attempts have been made to br<strong>in</strong>g together, compare, <strong>and</strong> assess reformexperiences from WCA <strong>and</strong> ESA. Bridg<strong>in</strong>g these knowledge gaps <strong>in</strong> an effort tobetter advise governments on cotton sector reform programs <strong>and</strong> policies providesthe fundamental rationale for this study.A number <strong>of</strong> SSA cotton sectors, especially <strong>in</strong> WCA, are currently fac<strong>in</strong>gserious short-term f<strong>in</strong>ancial difficulties. It is important to clarify that the purpose<strong>of</strong> this report is not to provide quick solutions to these short-run problems.Rather, it is to step back, build up a reliable broad assessment <strong>of</strong> cottonsector performance from detailed empirical <strong>in</strong>formation, <strong>and</strong> thereby providexivPREFACE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!