12.07.2015 Views

Organization and Performance of Cotton Sectors in Africa ... - infoDev

Organization and Performance of Cotton Sectors in Africa ... - infoDev

Organization and Performance of Cotton Sectors in Africa ... - infoDev

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER SEVENQuality ControlGérald Estur, Col<strong>in</strong> Poulton,<strong>and</strong> David TschirleyAs discussed <strong>in</strong> chapter 2, the fiber characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n cottons aretypically superior to those <strong>of</strong> the cottons used <strong>in</strong> the calculation <strong>of</strong> theCotlook A Index. Because it is nearly all h<strong>and</strong>picked, <strong>Africa</strong>n cotton isalso cleaner <strong>and</strong> has fewer neps than cotton <strong>of</strong> most other orig<strong>in</strong>s. For thesereasons, <strong>Africa</strong>n cotton could comm<strong>and</strong> as much as a US$0.10/lb premium on<strong>in</strong>ternational markets if the region could develop a reliable reputation for l<strong>in</strong>tuncontam<strong>in</strong>ated with foreign matter. 55 The typology suggests that concentratedsystems will be best able to achieve this potential premium, whereascompetitive systems are expected to show very limited ability to protect fiberquality <strong>and</strong> thus will achieve the lowest quality premiums (table 7.1). Thetypology predicts medium performance for national <strong>and</strong> local monopolies,with the ma<strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t be<strong>in</strong>g that actual performance depends critically on managementculture <strong>and</strong>, <strong>in</strong> local monopolies, regulatory effectiveness.Underly<strong>in</strong>g these predictions is an underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g that two conditions mustbe satisfied if a sector is to produce high-quality l<strong>in</strong>t. First, g<strong>in</strong>ners must be ableto control their supply cha<strong>in</strong>s to receive high-quality seed cotton. G<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g canonly protect or damage fiber quality; it cannot enhance it. Second, the farmersmust have the <strong>in</strong>centives to achieve high-quality l<strong>in</strong>t. This chapter <strong>in</strong>vestigatesthe extent to which these conditions hold <strong>in</strong> the study countries.The chapter first reviews common practices <strong>in</strong> each study country thataffect cotton quality, then develops estimates <strong>of</strong> the key quality <strong>in</strong>dicator foreach country—the average realized premium achieved <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational markets.It then exam<strong>in</strong>es performance across sector types <strong>and</strong> closes by compar<strong>in</strong>gexpected with realized performance.87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!