Perceptions of CO2 Report - Global CCS Institute
Perceptions of CO2 Report - Global CCS Institute Perceptions of CO2 Report - Global CCS Institute
Table 14: ANOVA (three factors) for influences of information in changes between the first assessment and thesecond assessment on CCS perceptionFactors(provided information)CO 2 characteristicsCO 2 natural phenomenaCO 2 behaviour in CCSCO 2 characteristicsx CO 2 naturalphenomenaStatistics Positive (5)-Negative (1)Type III sumof squaresClean (5)-Dirty (1)Useful (5)-Useless (1)Dangerous(1)-Safe (5)Matrure(5)-Developing(1)0.571 0.556 2.354 2.354 6.033F 0.710 0.747 3.285 2.643 7.674P-value 0.400 0.387 0.070 0.104 0.006Type III sumof squares12.273 2.174 0.668 13.262 1.951F 15.245 2.923 0.932 14.892 2.481P-value 0.000 0.087 0.335 0.000 0.115Type III sumof squares4.774 4.623 1.289 1.124 10.837F 5.929 6.215 1.798 1.262 13.783P-value 0.015 0.013 0.180 0.261 0.000Type III sumof squares3.894 1.715 1.905 0.006 0.035F 4.837 2.306 2.658 0.007 0.045(interaction term) P-value 0.028 0.129 0.103 0.935 0.833CO 2 characteristicsType III sumof squares0.015 3.958 0.958 0.080 0.501x CO 2 behaviour in CCS F 0.019 5.322 1.337 0.090 0.637(interaction term) P-value 0.891 0.021 0.248 0.764 0.425CO 2 natural phenomenaType III sumof squares2.847 4.203 0.453 0.662 0.045x CO 2 behaviour in CCS F 3.536 5.650 0.632 0.743 0.057(interaction term) P-value 0.060 0.018 0.427 0.389 0.811CO 2 characteristicsx CO 2 naturalphenomenax CO 2 behaviour in CCS(interaction term)ControlType III sumof squares0.191 0.277 0.026 0.144 1.354F 0.237 0.373 0.036 0.162 1.722P-value 0.626 0.542 0.850 0.688 0.190Type III sumof squares20.903 9.438 9.693 2.263 0.478+ Consequence F 25.965 12.689 13.524 2.541 0.608(order effect) P-value 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.111 0.436Type III sumof squaresCorrectedTotal2017.804 1854.551 1784.543 2209.936 1960.632df 2469 2469. 2469. 2469 2469Adjusted R-0.015 0.010 0.008 0.005 0.010squared(Note)Positive effect P
Table 15: Regression analysis on influence of provided information on magnitude of change of CCS impressionsDependent: CCSPositiveDF CCSCleanDF CCSUsefulDF CCSSafeDF CCSMatureDFCategory Variables std. coef std. coef std. coef std. coef std. coefProvidedInfoAProvidedInfoBProvidedInfoCProvidedInfoDInfoA - - - 0.213** -InfoChemistry - - -0.127*-0.180 ** -InfoProperty - - - - -InfoGHeffect - - - - -InfoToxicity - - - - 0.064**InfoPlace - - - - -InfoUse - - 0.162** - -InfoB - - 0.210** - -InfoNyos - - - - -InfoHotSpring - - - - -InfoPaintfactory - - -0.245** - -InfoDome - - - - -InfoMtMammoth -0.092** -0.050* --0.081 ** -InfoC - - - - -InfoCapture - - - - 0.089**InfoTransport 0.151* - - - (MC)InfoCauseEarthquake -0.204** - - - -InfoLiquidLike (MC) - - - -InfoUnderground - - - - -InfoLeakSoil - - - - -InfoLeakCracks - -0.057** - - -InfoCO 2andCC - - - - -InfoWhatCCS - - - - -InfoExtraEnergy - - - - -CCS Consequence (ordereffects)-0.119** -0.090** -0.081** - -Adjusted R-squared 0.019 0.008 0.016 0.011 0.012Note) *: significant level below 5%, **: significant level below 1%(MC): the covariate is excluded from the regression analysis because of high multicollinearity with other covariate(VIF is higher than 10)Understanding how individuals perceive carbon dioxide | 83
- Page 42 and 43: Second assessmentPerceptions were a
- Page 44 and 45: formed their opinion using the CCS
- Page 46 and 47: Table 18, Appendix F. Furthermore,
- Page 48 and 49: DF DF DFInfoACO 2characteristicsInf
- Page 50 and 51: Table 20 in Appendix F shows the re
- Page 52 and 53: 8 DiscussionThis international rese
- Page 54 and 55: eflect how close the potential CCS
- Page 56 and 57: eceived information about natural p
- Page 58 and 59: Part V Conclusion andRecommendation
- Page 60 and 61: 9.2 Recommendations9.2.1 NEED FOR E
- Page 62 and 63: Part VI Appendices andReferences52
- Page 64 and 65: Q: How did your images and understa
- Page 66 and 67: Q: What kind of information about C
- Page 68 and 69: Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9AQuestion statementsHere
- Page 70 and 71: BCQuestion statementsPlease read th
- Page 72 and 73: Q13Q14Q15Question statementsNext yo
- Page 74 and 75: Appendix D Participant Demographics
- Page 76 and 77: Appendix E Selected Qualitative Res
- Page 78 and 79: • “Water is such a precious thi
- Page 80 and 81: Univ_dmy - - - - -Female_dmy - - -
- Page 82 and 83: The table above shows the compariso
- Page 84 and 85: Set B: CCS impressionTable 12: Regr
- Page 86 and 87: •Extra CO 2 is put in the air in
- Page 88 and 89: a50s_dmyO60s_dmyCsea_dmyAdjusted R-
- Page 90 and 91: ionCCSawarenessCO 2Clean1CO 2Useful
- Page 94 and 95: Table 16: Regression analysis on in
- Page 96 and 97: CO 2relatedactivityInformationgathe
- Page 98 and 99: CO 2 relatedactivityInformationgath
- Page 100 and 101: Table 18: ANOVA (four factors) for
- Page 102 and 103: Table 20: Regression analysis on in
- Page 104 and 105: gathering topics Environment - - -0
- Page 106 and 107: Creswell, J. W. (2002). Research de
- Page 108: Shackley, S., Gough, C., & McLachla
Table 15: Regression analysis on influence <strong>of</strong> provided information on magnitude <strong>of</strong> change <strong>of</strong> <strong>CCS</strong> impressionsDependent: <strong>CCS</strong>PositiveDF <strong>CCS</strong>CleanDF <strong>CCS</strong>UsefulDF <strong>CCS</strong>SafeDF <strong>CCS</strong>MatureDFCategory Variables std. coef std. coef std. coef std. coef std. coefProvidedInfoAProvidedInfoBProvidedInfoCProvidedInfoDInfoA - - - 0.213** -InfoChemistry - - -0.127*-0.180 ** -InfoProperty - - - - -InfoGHeffect - - - - -InfoToxicity - - - - 0.064**InfoPlace - - - - -InfoUse - - 0.162** - -InfoB - - 0.210** - -InfoNyos - - - - -InfoHotSpring - - - - -InfoPaintfactory - - -0.245** - -InfoDome - - - - -InfoMtMammoth -0.092** -0.050* --0.081 ** -InfoC - - - - -InfoCapture - - - - 0.089**InfoTransport 0.151* - - - (MC)InfoCauseEarthquake -0.204** - - - -InfoLiquidLike (MC) - - - -InfoUnderground - - - - -InfoLeakSoil - - - - -InfoLeakCracks - -0.057** - - -InfoCO 2andCC - - - - -InfoWhat<strong>CCS</strong> - - - - -InfoExtraEnergy - - - - -<strong>CCS</strong> Consequence (ordereffects)-0.119** -0.090** -0.081** - -Adjusted R-squared 0.019 0.008 0.016 0.011 0.012Note) *: significant level below 5%, **: significant level below 1%(MC): the covariate is excluded from the regression analysis because <strong>of</strong> high multicollinearity with other covariate(VIF is higher than 10)Understanding how individuals perceive carbon dioxide | 83