Perceptions of CO2 Report - Global CCS Institute

a50s_dmy 0.052 ** 0.062 ** - 0.070 ** - 0.063 **O60s_dmy 0.090 ** 0.088 ** - 0.118 ** - 0.098 **Csea_dmy - - - - - -Adjusted R-squared 0.108 0.095 0.127 0.085 0.105 0.114Note) *: significant level below 5%, **: significant level below 1%(MC): the covariate is excluded from the regression analysis because of high multicollinearity with other covariate(VIF is higher than 10)For this table, the explanatory scores (adjusted R-squares) were very low (0.095 – 0.127), partiallybecause most of respondents stated impressions instantly when they faced the questions with verysimple explanation about CCS. In addition that is partially because covariates directly relevant toCCS were not introduced to the regression because there is not CCS questions before the CCSimpression questionnaire.A person’s acceptance of risks related to new technologies (beta 0.079, p < 0.01) had a positiveinfluence on impressions of CCS, including perceiving CCS overall as a “positive” technology (beta0.09, p.0.01), “clean” (0.09, p < 0.01), “useful” (beta 0.08, p .< 0.01), and “safe” (beta 0.07, p