Perceptions of CO2 Report - Global CCS Institute

More documents

Recommendations

Info

a50s_dmyO60s_dmyCsea_dmyAdjusted R-squared 0.321Note) *: significant level below 5% **: significant level below 1%(MC): the covariate is excluded from the regression analysis because of high multicollinearity with other covariate (VIF is higherthan 10)[MC]: InfoA, InfoC, InfoCauseEarthquake, InfoLiquidLike, InfoLeakSoil[-]:ConvincedGW, Renewable, FossilFuel, Risk, DoForGW, Lighter, Naturally, Soluble, AirContain, PlantNeed, Human, Ocean, Cola,Greenhouse, InputInd, InfoChemistry, InfoGHeffect, InfoToxicity, InfoPlace, InfoUse, InfoB, InfoNyos, InfoHotSpring,InfoPaintfactory, InfoDome, InfoMtMammoth, InfoTransport, InfoUnderground, InfoCO 2andCC, InfoExtraEnergy, CCSConsequence (order effects), NationalGov, NationalTV, LocalPaper, Developer, Activity, Nature, Environment, Technology,Biology, Univ_dmy, U20s_dmy, a30s_dmy, a40s_dmy, a50s_dmy, O60s_dmy, Csea_dmy78 | Understanding how individuals perceive carbon dioxide
Table 13: Regression analysis on influence of CO 2 knowledge, CO 2 impressions and respondents’ demographics onfirst assessment of CCS impressionsDependent:VariablesConvincedGWRenewableCCSPositiveCCSClean CCSUseful CCSSafe CCSMatureCCSimpression1score(Total)std. coef std. coef std. coef std. coef std. coef std. coef0.046 * - - - - -- - - - -0.054 ** -ValueandbeliefsFossilFuel - 0.057 ** - - - 0.048 *Risk 0.089 ** 0.073 ** 0.082 ** 0.071 ** - 0.079 **DoForGW - - - - - -MoreTax - - -0.061** - - -Lighter - - - - - -Naturally - - - - - -CO 2propertyFlammable- - - - - -Soluble - - - - - -AirContain - - - - -0.055** -EasyBD - - - - 0.045 * -PlantNeed - - - - - -Climate 0.041 - 0.089 ** - - 0.046 *CO 2understandingOzone 0.046 * - - - - -CO - -0.046 * - - - -Toxic - - - - - -Soot - - - -0.054 ** 0.081 ** -PowerPlant- 0.055 * 0.080 ** - -0.071 ** -Human - - -0.063 ** - -0.113 ** -0.065 **CO 2sourcePlantAbsorb- 0.059 ** 0.054 * - 0.045 * 0.057 *Ocean - - - - - -DifferentSubstance- - - - - -Cola - - - - - -CO 2usesGreenhouseFireExtinguisher0.044 * - - - - -- - - - - -Tyre - - - - - -InputInd - - - - - -CO 2impressCO 2Positive1- - -0.089 ** - 0.058 ** -Understanding how individuals perceive carbon dioxide | 79
Page 2 and 3:
Enquiries should be addressed to:Dr
Page 4 and 5:
Part V Conclusion and Recommendatio
Page 6 and 7:
TablesTable 1: Combination of infor
Page 8 and 9:
Executive summaryCarbon dioxide cap
Page 10 and 11:
Recommendations derived from this w
Page 12 and 13:
1 IntroductionClimate change has of
Page 14 and 15:
2.2 Perceptions of CO 2Very little
Page 16 and 17:
• perceptions about the nature an
Page 18 and 19:
3 OverviewThis research project’s
Page 20 and 21:
5 Internet surveyFindings from the
Page 22 and 23:
Respondents were provided with eith
Page 24 and 25:
6 Administration of the survey6.1 T
Page 26 and 27:
Part III Results16 | Understanding
Page 28 and 29:
7.1.2 KNOWLEDGE AND PERCEPTIONS OF
Page 30 and 31:
7.2 Quantitative resultsThe followi
Page 32 and 33:
PropertiesKnowledge about CO 2 ’s
Page 34 and 35:
UsesRespondents were asked about th
Page 36 and 37:
7.2.3 PERCEPTIONS OF CO 2First asse
Page 38 and 39: 7.2.4 AWARENESS AND PERCEPTIONS OF
Page 40 and 41: First assessmentError! Reference so
Page 42 and 43: Second assessmentPerceptions were a
Page 44 and 45: formed their opinion using the CCS
Page 46 and 47: Table 18, Appendix F. Furthermore,
Page 48 and 49: DF DF DFInfoACO 2characteristicsInf
Page 50 and 51: Table 20 in Appendix F shows the re
Page 52 and 53: 8 DiscussionThis international rese
Page 54 and 55: eflect how close the potential CCS
Page 56 and 57: eceived information about natural p
Page 58 and 59: Part V Conclusion andRecommendation
Page 60 and 61: 9.2 Recommendations9.2.1 NEED FOR E
Page 62 and 63: Part VI Appendices andReferences52
Page 64 and 65: Q: How did your images and understa
Page 66 and 67: Q: What kind of information about C
Page 68 and 69: Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9AQuestion statementsHere
Page 70 and 71: BCQuestion statementsPlease read th
Page 72 and 73: Q13Q14Q15Question statementsNext yo
Page 74 and 75: Appendix D Participant Demographics
Page 76 and 77: Appendix E Selected Qualitative Res
Page 78 and 79: • “Water is such a precious thi
Page 80 and 81: Univ_dmy - - - - -Female_dmy - - -
Page 82 and 83: The table above shows the compariso
Page 84 and 85: Set B: CCS impressionTable 12: Regr
Page 86 and 87: •Extra CO 2 is put in the air in
Page 90 and 91: ionCCSawarenessCO 2Clean1CO 2Useful
Page 92 and 93: Table 14: ANOVA (three factors) for
Page 94 and 95: Table 16: Regression analysis on in
Page 96 and 97: CO 2relatedactivityInformationgathe
Page 98 and 99: CO 2 relatedactivityInformationgath
Page 100 and 101: Table 18: ANOVA (four factors) for
Page 102 and 103: Table 20: Regression analysis on in
Page 104 and 105: gathering topics Environment - - -0
Page 106 and 107: Creswell, J. W. (2002). Research de
Page 108: Shackley, S., Gough, C., & McLachla
show all

Perceptions of CO2 Report - Global CCS Institute

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?