Perceptions of CO2 Report - Global CCS Institute

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Shackley, S., Gough, C., & McLachlan, C. (2005). The public perceptions of carbon dioxidecapture and storage in the UK. In E. S. Rubin, D. W. Keith, C. F. Gilboy, M. Wilson, T.Morris, J. Gale & K. Thambimuthu (Eds.), Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 7 (pp.1699-1704). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.Sharp, J. D., Jaccard, M. K., & Keith, D. W. (2009). Anticipating public attitudes towardunderground CO 2 storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 3(5), 641-651.Stamm, K. R., Clark, F., & Eblacas, P. R. (2000). Mass communication and public understanding ofenvironmental problems: the case of global warming. Public Understanding of Science,9(3), 219-237.Statistics Bureau. (2006). 2005 population census. Summary of the results: Chapter 1: Size andgeographical distribution of the population. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/kokusei/2005/nihon/pdf/summary.pdfTashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and QuantitativeApproaches Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications Inc.Terwel, B. W., Harinck, F., Ellemers, N., Daamen, D. D. L., & de Best-Waldhober, M. D. (2009).Trust as predictor of public acceptance of CCS. Energy Procedia, 1(1), 4613-4616.Tokushige, K., Akimoto, K., & Tomoda, T. (2007). Public perceptions on the acceptance ofgeological storage of carbon dioxide and information influencing the acceptance. [doi: DOI:10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00020-5]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 1(1),101-112.United Nations Framework on the Convention on Climate Change (1998). Kyoto ProtocolRetrieved 24 June, 2011, from http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.phpUpham, P., & Roberts, T. (2011). Public perceptions of CCS in context: Results of NearCO 2 focusgroups in the UK, Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Spain and Poland. EnergyProcedia, 4(0), 6338-6344.Wallquist, L., Visschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. (2009). Lay concepts on CCS deployment inSwitzerland based on qualitative interviews. [doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.03.005].International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 3(5), 652-657.Wallquist, L., Visschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. (2010). Impact of knowledge and misconceptionson benefit and risk perception of CCS. [Article]. Environmental Science & Technology,44(17), 6557-6562.Weber, E. U. (2010). What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews:Climate Change, 1(3), 332-342.Weber, E. U., & Stern, P. C. (2011). Public Understanding of Climate Change in the United States.[Article]. American Psychologist, 66(4), 315-328.Whitmarsh, L., Seyfang, G., & O'Neill, S. (2011). Public engagement with carbon and climatechange: To what extent is the public 'carbon capable'? [doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.011]. Global Environmental Change, 21(1), 56-65.98 | Understanding how individuals perceive carbon dioxide
Page 2 and 3:
Enquiries should be addressed to:Dr
Page 4 and 5:
Part V Conclusion and Recommendatio
Page 6 and 7:
TablesTable 1: Combination of infor
Page 8 and 9:
Executive summaryCarbon dioxide cap
Page 10 and 11:
Recommendations derived from this w
Page 12 and 13:
1 IntroductionClimate change has of
Page 14 and 15:
2.2 Perceptions of CO 2Very little
Page 16 and 17:
• perceptions about the nature an
Page 18 and 19:
3 OverviewThis research project’s
Page 20 and 21:
5 Internet surveyFindings from the
Page 22 and 23:
Respondents were provided with eith
Page 24 and 25:
6 Administration of the survey6.1 T
Page 26 and 27:
Part III Results16 | Understanding
Page 28 and 29:
7.1.2 KNOWLEDGE AND PERCEPTIONS OF
Page 30 and 31:
7.2 Quantitative resultsThe followi
Page 32 and 33:
PropertiesKnowledge about CO 2 ’s
Page 34 and 35:
UsesRespondents were asked about th
Page 36 and 37:
7.2.3 PERCEPTIONS OF CO 2First asse
Page 38 and 39:
7.2.4 AWARENESS AND PERCEPTIONS OF
Page 40 and 41:
First assessmentError! Reference so
Page 42 and 43:
Second assessmentPerceptions were a
Page 44 and 45:
formed their opinion using the CCS
Page 46 and 47:
Table 18, Appendix F. Furthermore,
Page 48 and 49:
DF DF DFInfoACO 2characteristicsInf
Page 50 and 51:
Table 20 in Appendix F shows the re
Page 52 and 53:
8 DiscussionThis international rese
Page 54 and 55:
eflect how close the potential CCS
Page 56 and 57:
eceived information about natural p
Page 58 and 59: Part V Conclusion andRecommendation
Page 60 and 61: 9.2 Recommendations9.2.1 NEED FOR E
Page 62 and 63: Part VI Appendices andReferences52
Page 64 and 65: Q: How did your images and understa
Page 66 and 67: Q: What kind of information about C
Page 68 and 69: Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9AQuestion statementsHere
Page 70 and 71: BCQuestion statementsPlease read th
Page 72 and 73: Q13Q14Q15Question statementsNext yo
Page 74 and 75: Appendix D Participant Demographics
Page 76 and 77: Appendix E Selected Qualitative Res
Page 78 and 79: • “Water is such a precious thi
Page 80 and 81: Univ_dmy - - - - -Female_dmy - - -
Page 82 and 83: The table above shows the compariso
Page 84 and 85: Set B: CCS impressionTable 12: Regr
Page 86 and 87: •Extra CO 2 is put in the air in
Page 88 and 89: a50s_dmyO60s_dmyCsea_dmyAdjusted R-
Page 90 and 91: ionCCSawarenessCO 2Clean1CO 2Useful
Page 92 and 93: Table 14: ANOVA (three factors) for
Page 94 and 95: Table 16: Regression analysis on in
Page 96 and 97: CO 2relatedactivityInformationgathe
Page 98 and 99: CO 2 relatedactivityInformationgath
Page 100 and 101: Table 18: ANOVA (four factors) for
Page 102 and 103: Table 20: Regression analysis on in
Page 104 and 105: gathering topics Environment - - -0
Page 106 and 107: Creswell, J. W. (2002). Research de
Page 110: CONTACT USt 1300 363 400+61 3 9545
show all

Perceptions of CO2 Report - Global CCS Institute

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?