Perceptions of CO2 Report - Global CCS Institute

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 20: Regression analysis on influence of knowledge items, provided information and misperception of CCS onCCS implementationDependent: ImplementCountry2 ImplementOnshore2 ImplementOffshore2Category Variables std. coef std. coef std. coefValue and beliefsCO 2 propertyCO 2understandingCO 2 sourceCO 2 usesCCS awarenessProvided InfoAProvided InfoBConvincedGW - - -Renewable - - -FossilFuel - - -Risk - 0.037 * 0.049 **DoForGW - - -MoreTax -0.044 ** -0.056 ** -0.046 **Lighter - - -Naturally - - -0.038 *Flammable - - -Soluble - - -AirContain - -0.038 * -EasyBD - 0.034 * -PlantNeed -0.046 ** - -0.039 *Climate 0.052 ** - 0.046 **Ozone - - -CO - 0.041 * -Toxic - - 0.036 *Soot 0.057 ** - -PowerPlant 0.042 * - 0.086 **Human - - -PlantAbsorb - - -Ocean - - -DifferentSubstance- - -Cola - 0.048 ** -Greenhouse 0.045 ** - 0.068 **FireExtinguisher - - -Tyre - - -InputInd - - -KnowCCS_dmy - - -KnowLittleCCS_dmy- - -HeardCCS_dmy - - -InfoA (MC) - (MC)InfoChemistry (MC) - (MC)InfoProperty 0.074 ** - 0.046 **InfoGHeffect - - -InfoToxicity - - -InfoPlace - - -InfoUse - - -InfoB - - -InfoNyos - - -InfoHotSpring 0.089 * 0.149 ** -InfoPaintfactory - - -InfoDome - - -InfoMtMammoth -0.113 ** -0.176 ** -Provided InfoC InfoC - - (MC)92 | Understanding how individuals perceive carbon dioxide
Provided InfoDInfoCapture (MC) (MC) (MC)InfoTransport (MC) (MC) (MC)InfoCauseEarthquake-0.067 ** (MC) -0.066 **InfoLiquidLike (MC) - (MC)InfoUnderground (MC) - (MC)InfoLeakSoil (MC) -0.079 ** (MC)InfoLeakCracks - - -InfoCO 2andCCS 0.057 * - -InfoWhatCCS - - 0.074 **InfoExtraEnergy - - -CCS Consequence (order effects) -0.060 ** -0.050 ** -0.072 **CO 2 impression2CCSconsequencelikelihoodCCSconsequencemisperceptionCCS perceptionand opinionTrustworthysourceCO 2 relatedactivityCO 2Positive2 - 0.066 ** 0.068 **CO 2Clean2 0.042 * - -CO 2Useful2 - - -CO 2Dangerous2 0.059 ** 0.095 ** 0.062 **MoveAtmosphere- - -0.064 **Soil - -0.073 ** -0.091 **LeakOn - - -LeakOff - - -0.069 **FlowIntoSea -0.060 ** - -EarthquakeLeak - -0.062 ** -ChemicalReact - 0.038 * -Caprock - - -Fire - - -Ecosystem - - -Vacant - - -Radiation - - -Solid - - -MeasureMonitor 0.080 ** 0.071 ** 0.044 *BreakDown -0.058 ** - -ManyRisk -0.294 ** -0.223 ** -0.196 **Gurantee - -0.056 ** -MitigateCC 0.293 ** 0.197 ** 0.238 **KnowEnough 0.103 ** 0.075 ** 0.091 **WhatHappen - -0.082 ** -NationalGov 0.057 ** - 0.066 **LocalGov - - -NationalTV - - -NationalPaper - - -LocalPaper - - -Scientist - - -Developer 0.039 * 0.052 ** 0.037 *NationalNGO - - -LocalNGO - - -Friend - - -Website - - -UNagency - 0.045 * -Activity - 0.035 * -Information Nature - - -Understanding how individuals perceive carbon dioxide | 93
Page 2 and 3:
Enquiries should be addressed to:Dr
Page 4 and 5:
Part V Conclusion and Recommendatio
Page 6 and 7:
TablesTable 1: Combination of infor
Page 8 and 9:
Executive summaryCarbon dioxide cap
Page 10 and 11:
Recommendations derived from this w
Page 12 and 13:
1 IntroductionClimate change has of
Page 14 and 15:
2.2 Perceptions of CO 2Very little
Page 16 and 17:
• perceptions about the nature an
Page 18 and 19:
3 OverviewThis research project’s
Page 20 and 21:
5 Internet surveyFindings from the
Page 22 and 23:
Respondents were provided with eith
Page 24 and 25:
6 Administration of the survey6.1 T
Page 26 and 27:
Part III Results16 | Understanding
Page 28 and 29:
7.1.2 KNOWLEDGE AND PERCEPTIONS OF
Page 30 and 31:
7.2 Quantitative resultsThe followi
Page 32 and 33:
PropertiesKnowledge about CO 2 ’s
Page 34 and 35:
UsesRespondents were asked about th
Page 36 and 37:
7.2.3 PERCEPTIONS OF CO 2First asse
Page 38 and 39:
7.2.4 AWARENESS AND PERCEPTIONS OF
Page 40 and 41:
First assessmentError! Reference so
Page 42 and 43:
Second assessmentPerceptions were a
Page 44 and 45:
formed their opinion using the CCS
Page 46 and 47:
Table 18, Appendix F. Furthermore,
Page 48 and 49:
DF DF DFInfoACO 2characteristicsInf
Page 50 and 51:
Table 20 in Appendix F shows the re
Page 52 and 53: 8 DiscussionThis international rese
Page 54 and 55: eflect how close the potential CCS
Page 56 and 57: eceived information about natural p
Page 58 and 59: Part V Conclusion andRecommendation
Page 60 and 61: 9.2 Recommendations9.2.1 NEED FOR E
Page 62 and 63: Part VI Appendices andReferences52
Page 64 and 65: Q: How did your images and understa
Page 66 and 67: Q: What kind of information about C
Page 68 and 69: Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9AQuestion statementsHere
Page 70 and 71: BCQuestion statementsPlease read th
Page 72 and 73: Q13Q14Q15Question statementsNext yo
Page 74 and 75: Appendix D Participant Demographics
Page 76 and 77: Appendix E Selected Qualitative Res
Page 78 and 79: • “Water is such a precious thi
Page 80 and 81: Univ_dmy - - - - -Female_dmy - - -
Page 82 and 83: The table above shows the compariso
Page 84 and 85: Set B: CCS impressionTable 12: Regr
Page 86 and 87: •Extra CO 2 is put in the air in
Page 88 and 89: a50s_dmyO60s_dmyCsea_dmyAdjusted R-
Page 90 and 91: ionCCSawarenessCO 2Clean1CO 2Useful
Page 92 and 93: Table 14: ANOVA (three factors) for
Page 94 and 95: Table 16: Regression analysis on in
Page 96 and 97: CO 2relatedactivityInformationgathe
Page 98 and 99: CO 2 relatedactivityInformationgath
Page 100 and 101: Table 18: ANOVA (four factors) for
Page 104 and 105: gathering topics Environment - - -0
Page 106 and 107: Creswell, J. W. (2002). Research de
Page 108: Shackley, S., Gough, C., & McLachla
show all

Perceptions of CO2 Report - Global CCS Institute

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?