Perceptions of CO2 Report - Global CCS Institute

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 18: ANOVA (four factors) for influences of information in changes between the first assessment and thesecond assessment on opinions on CCS implementationsFactors (providedinformation)CO 2 characteristicsCO 2 natural phenomenaCO 2 behaviour in CCSStatisticsType III sum ofsquaresImplementationcountryFavour (5)-Against (1)ImplementationOnshoreFavour (5)-Against (1)ImplementationOffshoreFavour (5)-Against (1)7.773 4.043 4.454F 13.537 7.168 7.485P-value 0.000 0.007 0.006Type III sum ofsquares3.803 4.278 4.657F 6.623 7.584 7.826P-value 0.010 0.006 0.005Type III sum ofsquares2.447 2.631 1.404F 4.261 4.664 2.360P-value 0.039 0.031 0.125CO 2 characteristicsType III sum of0.058 1.433 0.680squaresx CO 2 natural phenomena F 0.101 2.540 1.142(interaction term) P-value 0.751 0.111 0.285CO 2 characteristicsType III sum of0.252 0.158 0.187squaresx CO 2 behaviour in CCS F 0.439 0.280 0.315(interaction term) P-value 0.508 0.596 0.575CO 2 natural phenomenaType III sum ofsquares0.004 0.181 0.144x CO 2 behaviour in CCS F 0.007 0.321 0.242(interaction term) P-value 0.935 0.571 0.623CO 2 characteristicsType III sum of0.328 1.107 0.597squaresx CO 2 natural phenomena F 0.571 1.962 1.003x CO 2 behaviour in CCS(interaction term)P-value 0.450 0.161 0.317ControlType III sum of1.556 1.001 5.084squares+ Consequence F 2.709 1.775 8.544(order effect) P-value 0.100 0.183 0.003Type III sum ofsquaresCorrected Total1430.259 1402.128 1481.032df 2469 2469 2469.Adjusted R-squared 0.009 0.007 0.008(Note)Positive effect P
Table 19: Regression analysis on influence of provided information on magnitude of change of CCS implementationDependent: ImplementCountyrDF ImplementOnshoreDF ImplementOffshoreDFCategory Variables std. coef std. coef std. coefProvidedInfoAProvidedInfoBProvidedInfoCProvidedInfoDInfoA 0.089 ** - 0.071 **InfoChemistry - - -InfoProperty - 0.060** -InfoGHeffect - - -InfoToxicity - - -InfoPlace - - -InfoUse - - -InfoB 0.233 ** - -InfoNyos - - -InfoHotSpring - 0.132** 0.223 **InfoPaintfactory - - -0.270 **InfoDome - - -InfoMtMammoth -0.295 ** -0.192** -InfoC - - -InfoCapture - - -InfoTransport - 0.147* -InfoCauseEarthquake - - -InfoLiquidLike - - -InfoUnderground - - -InfoLeakSoil - - -InfoLeakCracks - -0.196** -InfoCO 2andCC - 0.066 *InfoWhatCCS - - -InfoExtraEnergy - - -CCS Consequence (ordereffects)- - -0.089**Adjusted R-squared 0.017 0.015 0.019Note) *: significant level below 5%, **: significant level below 1%(MC): the covariate is excluded from the regression analysis because of high multicollinearity with other covariate(VIF is higher than 10)Understanding how individuals perceive carbon dioxide | 91
Page 2 and 3:
Enquiries should be addressed to:Dr
Page 4 and 5:
Part V Conclusion and Recommendatio
Page 6 and 7:
TablesTable 1: Combination of infor
Page 8 and 9:
Executive summaryCarbon dioxide cap
Page 10 and 11:
Recommendations derived from this w
Page 12 and 13:
1 IntroductionClimate change has of
Page 14 and 15:
2.2 Perceptions of CO 2Very little
Page 16 and 17:
• perceptions about the nature an
Page 18 and 19:
3 OverviewThis research project’s
Page 20 and 21:
5 Internet surveyFindings from the
Page 22 and 23:
Respondents were provided with eith
Page 24 and 25:
6 Administration of the survey6.1 T
Page 26 and 27:
Part III Results16 | Understanding
Page 28 and 29:
7.1.2 KNOWLEDGE AND PERCEPTIONS OF
Page 30 and 31:
7.2 Quantitative resultsThe followi
Page 32 and 33:
PropertiesKnowledge about CO 2 ’s
Page 34 and 35:
UsesRespondents were asked about th
Page 36 and 37:
7.2.3 PERCEPTIONS OF CO 2First asse
Page 38 and 39:
7.2.4 AWARENESS AND PERCEPTIONS OF
Page 40 and 41:
First assessmentError! Reference so
Page 42 and 43:
Second assessmentPerceptions were a
Page 44 and 45:
formed their opinion using the CCS
Page 46 and 47:
Table 18, Appendix F. Furthermore,
Page 48 and 49:
DF DF DFInfoACO 2characteristicsInf
Page 50 and 51: Table 20 in Appendix F shows the re
Page 52 and 53: 8 DiscussionThis international rese
Page 54 and 55: eflect how close the potential CCS
Page 56 and 57: eceived information about natural p
Page 58 and 59: Part V Conclusion andRecommendation
Page 60 and 61: 9.2 Recommendations9.2.1 NEED FOR E
Page 62 and 63: Part VI Appendices andReferences52
Page 64 and 65: Q: How did your images and understa
Page 66 and 67: Q: What kind of information about C
Page 68 and 69: Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9AQuestion statementsHere
Page 70 and 71: BCQuestion statementsPlease read th
Page 72 and 73: Q13Q14Q15Question statementsNext yo
Page 74 and 75: Appendix D Participant Demographics
Page 76 and 77: Appendix E Selected Qualitative Res
Page 78 and 79: • “Water is such a precious thi
Page 80 and 81: Univ_dmy - - - - -Female_dmy - - -
Page 82 and 83: The table above shows the compariso
Page 84 and 85: Set B: CCS impressionTable 12: Regr
Page 86 and 87: •Extra CO 2 is put in the air in
Page 88 and 89: a50s_dmyO60s_dmyCsea_dmyAdjusted R-
Page 90 and 91: ionCCSawarenessCO 2Clean1CO 2Useful
Page 92 and 93: Table 14: ANOVA (three factors) for
Page 94 and 95: Table 16: Regression analysis on in
Page 96 and 97: CO 2relatedactivityInformationgathe
Page 98 and 99: CO 2 relatedactivityInformationgath
Page 102 and 103: Table 20: Regression analysis on in
Page 104 and 105: gathering topics Environment - - -0
Page 106 and 107: Creswell, J. W. (2002). Research de
Page 108: Shackley, S., Gough, C., & McLachla
show all

Perceptions of CO2 Report - Global CCS Institute

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?