Identification of American Herring Gull in a western European context

Identification of American Herring Gull in a western European context Identification of American Herring Gull in a western European context

gull.research.org
from gull.research.org More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

Identification of American Herring Gull in a western European context7374757677 7873 American Herring Gull / Amerikaanse Zilvermeeuw Larus smithsonianus, near-adult, Boston, Massachusetts,USA, January 2001 (Pat Lonergan). Note solid-black ‘patch’ on middle tertial and extensive solid-black on primarycoverts.74 American Herring Gull / Amerikaanse Zilvermeeuw Larus smithsonianus, adult, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,January 1999 (Pat Lonergan). Similar to bird in plate 77 and 83.75 American Herring Gull / Amerikaanse Zilvermeeuw Larus smithsonianus, adult, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,February 1999 (Killian Mullarney). Note small tertial-spot on this otherwise apparently ‘full’ adult.76 American Herring Gull / Amerikaanse Zilvermeeuw Larus smithsonianus, adult or near-adult, Boston,Massachusetts, USA, January 2001 (Pat Lonergan). Note tertial-spot and black on primary coverts.77 American Herring Gull / Amerikaanse Zilvermeeuw Larus smithsonianus, adult or near-adult, Boston,Massachusetts, USA, February 1999 (Killian Mullarney). Note rather blotchy head pattern and fine shaft-streaks onprimary coverts.78 American Herring Gull / Amerikaanse Zilvermeeuw Larus smithsonianus, near-adult, Boston, Massachusetts,USA, January 2001 (Pat Lonergan). Note dark in primary coverts.28

Identification of American Herring Gull in a western European contextdifferences in wing-tip pattern between Newfoundlandand Niagara smithsonianus and proposed that thesepopulations represent two distinct types. In the originaldraft of this paper submitted to the editors of DutchBirding we made an attempt to identify potentially usefuldifferences in wing-tip pattern between smithsonianusand European Herring Gulls. However, aware ofthe fact that long-term studies of known-age argenteusand graellsii in Britain (Martin Elliott pers comm) indicatethat wing-tip pattern can continue to change wellbeyond the point at which they acquire ‘adult’ plumage,we doubted that any of our conclusions on thisparticular aspect of smithsonianus identification wouldprove to be of much practical value. More recently, webecame aware that a detailed paper on wing-tip patterndifferences between adult smithsonianus and EuropeanHerring Gull was being prepared by Peter Adriaens andBruce Mactavish. We are confident that these authorswill demonstrate the potential usefulness of wing-tippattern differences far more successfully than wemanaged to do and we eagerly await publication oftheir findings in a forthcoming issue of Dutch Birding.Primary coverts A rather high proportion (10-15%) of‘adult’ and near-adult birds exhibit dark markings on theprimary coverts. These vary from extremely fine blackshaft-streaks (plate 74, 77 and 83) to broader, moreobvious, black lozenge-shaped marks (plate 76, 78 and84). Dark primary-covert-markings are sometimesshown by a few adult and often by near-adult argenteus(Grant 1986) but they tend not to be as well definedand neat, or as black, as in many smithsonianus.Winter head-markings The pattern of winter headstreakingin adults and near-adults often appears differentin smithsonianus – being blotchier with less well-definedstreaks than in argentatus/argenteus (plate 74, 77 and83). However, as with many of the other features, this isvariable and should be used with caution.Bill pattern A high proportion of the near-adult smithsonianuswe studied in Massachusetts in January-February had more extensive blackish markings aroundthe gonydeal area of one or both mandibles than weare used to seeing in European Herring Gulls at thesame time of year. Dark markings on the bill in all ofthese large gulls are linked with both immaturity andwith season (with adults developing a dark spot in winter),so their significance in the context of identifying avagrant in Europe is doubtful.VoiceWhile at this stage we do not anticipate voicecharacteristics having a major bearing on theidentification of vagrants, we have registered adistinctly deeper tone, and possibly a subtly differentrepertoire compared with argenteus withwhich we are most familiar. Whether this is primarilya function of body size and whether thedifferences are as pronounced in comparisonwith argentatus is unclear and requires furtherresearch.HybridsWhile ‘larophiles’ on the West Coast of NorthAmerica have had to make sense of an extraordinaryvariety of hybrid gulls for many years,and have now gained sufficient confidence to beable to guess the parentage of many of them,their equivalent in Europe is lagging behind inthis particular field. With presumed hybridsapparently being of much more exceptionaloccurrence in Europe than on the West coast ofNorth America it is difficult for any individual togain a broad enough perspective on the problemto begin to make sense of it. The extent to whichhybrid gulls in Europe may be complicating ourattempts to identify smithsonianus on this side ofthe Atlantic can only be guessed at, and until wehave a clearer understanding of the limits ofvariation within ‘pure’ smithsonianus it is likelyto remain so.Some first-winter and second-winter presumedhybrids Glaucous x European Herring Gull beara strong superficial resemblance to smithsonianus,especially when their mix of characterscombines the size, rather uniform plumage, billcolouration and general demeanour of Glaucouswith the dark wing-tip and tail pattern ofEuropean Herring. Most, however, possessobvious clues in their appearance to their hybridorigin, such as a much reduced or washed-outtail-band and secondary-bar, obvious pale fringesto the primary-tips or, at rest, a lighter overalltone to the tertials than a typical EuropeanHerring; others, however are not so obvious andcorrect identification may require very criticalconsideration indeed. In North America, hybridsGlaucous x smithsonianus (so-called ‘Nelson’sGull’) occur; these are usually more similar toGlaucous than to smithsonianus (Bruce Mactavishin litt) but there is evidence that differentpopulations of smithsonianus and Glaucous producedifferent looking hybrids, some of whichlook more like pale smithsonianus but with lowcontrast between tertials and folded primariesand rest of upperparts (Bruce Mactavish in litt).At least two birds believed to be second-wintersmithsonianus recorded in Ireland were initiallythought to be hybrids Glaucous x EuropeanHerring until more detailed examination indicatedthat their Glaucous-like character was quitecompatible with typical second-winter smithsonianus.ConclusionWith a total of around 70 accepted or likely to beaccepted records of smithsonianus in Europe29

<strong>Identification</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Gull</strong> <strong>in</strong> a <strong>western</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>context</strong>differences <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>g-tip pattern between Newfoundlandand Niagara smithsonianus and proposed that thesepopulations represent two dist<strong>in</strong>ct types. In the orig<strong>in</strong>aldraft <strong>of</strong> this paper submitted to the editors <strong>of</strong> DutchBird<strong>in</strong>g we made an attempt to identify potentially usefuldifferences <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>g-tip pattern between smithsonianusand <strong>European</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Gull</strong>s. However, aware <strong>of</strong>the fact that long-term studies <strong>of</strong> known-age argenteusand graellsii <strong>in</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> (Mart<strong>in</strong> Elliott pers comm) <strong>in</strong>dicatethat w<strong>in</strong>g-tip pattern can cont<strong>in</strong>ue to change wellbeyond the po<strong>in</strong>t at which they acquire ‘adult’ plumage,we doubted that any <strong>of</strong> our conclusions on thisparticular aspect <strong>of</strong> smithsonianus identification wouldprove to be <strong>of</strong> much practical value. More recently, webecame aware that a detailed paper on w<strong>in</strong>g-tip patterndifferences between adult smithsonianus and <strong>European</strong><strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Gull</strong> was be<strong>in</strong>g prepared by Peter Adriaens andBruce Mactavish. We are confident that these authorswill demonstrate the potential usefulness <strong>of</strong> w<strong>in</strong>g-tippattern differences far more successfully than wemanaged to do and we eagerly await publication <strong>of</strong>their f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> a forthcom<strong>in</strong>g issue <strong>of</strong> Dutch Bird<strong>in</strong>g.Primary coverts A rather high proportion (10-15%) <strong>of</strong>‘adult’ and near-adult birds exhibit dark mark<strong>in</strong>gs on theprimary coverts. These vary from extremely f<strong>in</strong>e blackshaft-streaks (plate 74, 77 and 83) to broader, moreobvious, black lozenge-shaped marks (plate 76, 78 and84). Dark primary-covert-mark<strong>in</strong>gs are sometimesshown by a few adult and <strong>of</strong>ten by near-adult argenteus(Grant 1986) but they tend not to be as well def<strong>in</strong>edand neat, or as black, as <strong>in</strong> many smithsonianus.W<strong>in</strong>ter head-mark<strong>in</strong>gs The pattern <strong>of</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter headstreak<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> adults and near-adults <strong>of</strong>ten appears different<strong>in</strong> smithsonianus – be<strong>in</strong>g blotchier with less well-def<strong>in</strong>edstreaks than <strong>in</strong> argentatus/argenteus (plate 74, 77 and83). However, as with many <strong>of</strong> the other features, this isvariable and should be used with caution.Bill pattern A high proportion <strong>of</strong> the near-adult smithsonianuswe studied <strong>in</strong> Massachusetts <strong>in</strong> January-February had more extensive blackish mark<strong>in</strong>gs aroundthe gonydeal area <strong>of</strong> one or both mandibles than weare used to see<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Gull</strong>s at thesame time <strong>of</strong> year. Dark mark<strong>in</strong>gs on the bill <strong>in</strong> all <strong>of</strong>these large gulls are l<strong>in</strong>ked with both immaturity andwith season (with adults develop<strong>in</strong>g a dark spot <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter),so their significance <strong>in</strong> the <strong>context</strong> <strong>of</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g avagrant <strong>in</strong> Europe is doubtful.VoiceWhile at this stage we do not anticipate voicecharacteristics hav<strong>in</strong>g a major bear<strong>in</strong>g on theidentification <strong>of</strong> vagrants, we have registered adist<strong>in</strong>ctly deeper tone, and possibly a subtly differentrepertoire compared with argenteus withwhich we are most familiar. Whether this is primarilya function <strong>of</strong> body size and whether thedifferences are as pronounced <strong>in</strong> comparisonwith argentatus is unclear and requires furtherresearch.HybridsWhile ‘larophiles’ on the West Coast <strong>of</strong> NorthAmerica have had to make sense <strong>of</strong> an extraord<strong>in</strong>aryvariety <strong>of</strong> hybrid gulls for many years,and have now ga<strong>in</strong>ed sufficient confidence to beable to guess the parentage <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> them,their equivalent <strong>in</strong> Europe is lagg<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>this particular field. With presumed hybridsapparently be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> much more exceptionaloccurrence <strong>in</strong> Europe than on the West coast <strong>of</strong>North America it is difficult for any <strong>in</strong>dividual toga<strong>in</strong> a broad enough perspective on the problemto beg<strong>in</strong> to make sense <strong>of</strong> it. The extent to whichhybrid gulls <strong>in</strong> Europe may be complicat<strong>in</strong>g ourattempts to identify smithsonianus on this side <strong>of</strong>the Atlantic can only be guessed at, and until wehave a clearer understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the limits <strong>of</strong>variation with<strong>in</strong> ‘pure’ smithsonianus it is likelyto rema<strong>in</strong> so.Some first-w<strong>in</strong>ter and second-w<strong>in</strong>ter presumedhybrids Glaucous x <strong>European</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Gull</strong> beara strong superficial resemblance to smithsonianus,especially when their mix <strong>of</strong> characterscomb<strong>in</strong>es the size, rather uniform plumage, billcolouration and general demeanour <strong>of</strong> Glaucouswith the dark w<strong>in</strong>g-tip and tail pattern <strong>of</strong><strong>European</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. Most, however, possessobvious clues <strong>in</strong> their appearance to their hybridorig<strong>in</strong>, such as a much reduced or washed-outtail-band and secondary-bar, obvious pale fr<strong>in</strong>gesto the primary-tips or, at rest, a lighter overalltone to the tertials than a typical <strong>European</strong><strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong>; others, however are not so obvious andcorrect identification may require very criticalconsideration <strong>in</strong>deed. In North America, hybridsGlaucous x smithsonianus (so-called ‘Nelson’s<strong>Gull</strong>’) occur; these are usually more similar toGlaucous than to smithsonianus (Bruce Mactavish<strong>in</strong> litt) but there is evidence that differentpopulations <strong>of</strong> smithsonianus and Glaucous producedifferent look<strong>in</strong>g hybrids, some <strong>of</strong> whichlook more like pale smithsonianus but with lowcontrast between tertials and folded primariesand rest <strong>of</strong> upperparts (Bruce Mactavish <strong>in</strong> litt).At least two birds believed to be second-w<strong>in</strong>tersmithsonianus recorded <strong>in</strong> Ireland were <strong>in</strong>itiallythought to be hybrids Glaucous x <strong>European</strong><strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> until more detailed exam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong>dicatedthat their Glaucous-like character was quitecompatible with typical second-w<strong>in</strong>ter smithsonianus.ConclusionWith a total <strong>of</strong> around 70 accepted or likely to beaccepted records <strong>of</strong> smithsonianus <strong>in</strong> Europe29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!