<strong>Identification</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Gull</strong> <strong>in</strong> a <strong>western</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>context</strong>123456FIGURE 1Variation <strong>in</strong> rump and tail pattern <strong>of</strong> first-w<strong>in</strong>ter <strong>American</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Gull</strong> / Amerikaanse Zilvermeeuw Larussmithsonianus (Pat Lonergan & Killian Mullarney). Note that tail pattern varies from wholly dark at one extreme(1 and 2) to, rarely, well-def<strong>in</strong>ed tail-band (8). More <strong>of</strong>ten, however, pattern is <strong>in</strong>termediate, with obvious vermiculationon both webs <strong>of</strong> outer two or three rectrices.78a m<strong>in</strong>ority <strong>of</strong> first-year smithsonianus really do havewhat might justifiably be described as an ‘all-dark’ tail;2 an absolutely all-dark tail (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the outer webs<strong>of</strong> the outermost rectrices) has been observed <strong>in</strong> firstyear<strong>European</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Gull</strong>s; 3 the difficulty <strong>in</strong> establish<strong>in</strong>gthe exact tail pattern <strong>in</strong> the field, as opposed t<strong>of</strong>rom critical exam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> good photographs, is <strong>of</strong>tenunderestimated. Many smithsonianus have an extent <strong>of</strong>dark on the tail that is very rarely matched by <strong>European</strong><strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. Those with the most extensively dark tailshave a solid-dark upper tail surface, as viewed fromabove (plate 33, figure 1), the only relief be<strong>in</strong>g the paleshaft-bases. Close exam<strong>in</strong>ation will <strong>of</strong>ten reveal a verynarrow strip, barred black and white, along the outermostedge to the tail (plate 3, figure 1) and it is notunusual for there to be some limited pale barr<strong>in</strong>g orvermiculation on the bases to the outer two or threepairs <strong>of</strong> rectrices. In addition, the fully spread tail (bestlooked for as a bird takes <strong>of</strong>f or just before it alights), ora view <strong>of</strong> the tail from below, will <strong>of</strong>ten reveal quiteextensive areas <strong>of</strong> pale barr<strong>in</strong>g or vermiculation on thebases to the <strong>in</strong>ner webs <strong>of</strong> the outer rectrices. Thevariety <strong>of</strong> tail patterns featured <strong>in</strong> figure 1 clearlyillustrate the po<strong>in</strong>t that an ‘all-dark’ tail should notnecessarily be considered a prerequisite <strong>of</strong> smithsonianus.Some <strong>European</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Gull</strong>s can show a tail patternapproach<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>of</strong> classic smithsonianus but onlyexceptionally are the outer rectrices wholly dark (PeterAdriaens pers comm). Similarly, it is not exceptional forsmithsonianus to have extensive white (usually barreddark) at the base to the outer rectrices and it may evenbe that this variation is more frequent <strong>in</strong> some populationsthan <strong>in</strong> others.Vent and undertail-coverts The ventral area andundertail-coverts <strong>of</strong> juvenile smithsonianus are generallymore densely patterned with dark than <strong>in</strong> <strong>European</strong><strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Gull</strong>, <strong>in</strong> which these areas are sparsely markedand usually appear predom<strong>in</strong>antly whitish. ’Classic’smithsonianus are so extensively dark on the undertailcovertsthat the white ’bars’ may be reduced to littlemore than paired spots, and the longest undertail-covertsmay be almost solidly dark-centred; such bold andextensive dark mark<strong>in</strong>gs are probably never shown by<strong>European</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, although a few are more heavilymarked than usual and may resemble smithsonianus.Of course, some smithsonianus are not so heavilymarked on the undertail-coverts but such birds are verymuch <strong>in</strong> a m<strong>in</strong>ority <strong>in</strong> North America, at least <strong>in</strong>Atlantic seaboard populations. Any suspected juvenilesmithsonianus <strong>in</strong> Europe which does not exhibit reasonablydense or bold undertail-covert-mark<strong>in</strong>gsshould be considered very critically before be<strong>in</strong>g positivelyidentified.Pattern <strong>of</strong> rump and uppertail-coverts In smithsonianus,the rump and uppertail-coverts are characteristicallydensely patterned with dark brown bars, chevronsor large spots, the overall tone be<strong>in</strong>g close to that <strong>of</strong> therest <strong>of</strong> the upperparts but clearly contrast<strong>in</strong>g with the<strong>of</strong>ten ‘all-dark’ tail (plate 3). The overall look <strong>of</strong> the tailand rump may prompt comparisons with that <strong>of</strong> a paleor<strong>in</strong>termediate-morph juvenile Pomar<strong>in</strong>e JaegerStercorarius pomar<strong>in</strong>us. On well-marked birds, this is astrik<strong>in</strong>g difference from any typical <strong>European</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>Gull</strong> but the degree <strong>of</strong> variation both ways means thereis considerable overlap. The longest uppertail-covertsmay have a completely dark centre – a pattern similar10
<strong>Identification</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>American</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Gull</strong> <strong>in</strong> a <strong>western</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>context</strong>to that <strong>of</strong> the lower scapulars, and very probably notoccurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> first-year <strong>European</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong>.Uniformity <strong>of</strong> underparts The strik<strong>in</strong>gly smoothtextured,evenly dark underparts <strong>of</strong> many juvenilesmithsonianus (plate 1 and 4) are probably never trulymatched by <strong>European</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Gull</strong>s. Sometimes,however, <strong>European</strong> birds are more evenly saturatedand darker-look<strong>in</strong>g below than usual (plate 16), so careshould be taken not to place too much importance onthis feature alone.Upperparts The pale fr<strong>in</strong>ges and notches to the upperpart-feathersaverage slightly less extensive than <strong>in</strong><strong>European</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Gull</strong>, contribut<strong>in</strong>g to an overall darkerappearance. At the darker end <strong>of</strong> the range (plate 1),the patterns are probably never matched by juvenile<strong>European</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> but lighter smithsonianus could easilyescape detection, at least on the basis <strong>of</strong> upperpartspattern, among their <strong>European</strong> counterparts.Tertial pattern In juvenile plumage, the tertial patternis rather similar to some graellsii (and therefore unlikemost argenteus) with little notch<strong>in</strong>g which is generally‘f<strong>in</strong>er’ and is usually conf<strong>in</strong>ed to the tips <strong>of</strong> the feathers.Juvenile argentatus tertials are <strong>of</strong>ten even more extensivelypale-notched than <strong>in</strong> argenteus but, significantly,a high proportion <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>nish argentatus, which mightbe described as ‘dark type’, have much reduced palefr<strong>in</strong>ge-mark<strong>in</strong>gs, their tertials be<strong>in</strong>g similarly patternedto graellsii (plate 18).Greater-covert bar Most smithsonianus show a variableamount <strong>of</strong> solid dark-brown at the base <strong>of</strong> thegreater coverts which is clearly visible on the rest<strong>in</strong>gbird (plate 28, 36 and 37), form<strong>in</strong>g an additional ‘bar’<strong>in</strong> flight (plate 33), similar to that shown by most firstyeargraellsii. The significance <strong>of</strong> this feature has, perhaps,been over-emphasized s<strong>in</strong>ce it is by no meansexclusive to smithsonianus and is <strong>of</strong>ten shown byargentatus and sometimes by argenteus.Inner primaries On average, the <strong>in</strong>ner-primary w<strong>in</strong>dow<strong>of</strong> first- and second-year smithsonianus is slightlyduller than <strong>in</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Gull</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the same age,add<strong>in</strong>g to the uniformity <strong>of</strong> the upperw<strong>in</strong>g. While thereis usually no strong contrast between <strong>in</strong>ner and outerwebs on these feathers <strong>in</strong> either smithsonianus or<strong>European</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> (thus differ<strong>in</strong>g from graellsii), theground colour <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ner primaries is rather dullbrownish grey <strong>in</strong> smithsonianus, while more pale greyish(with less <strong>of</strong> a muddy brown t<strong>in</strong>ge) <strong>in</strong> <strong>European</strong><strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Gull</strong>. This is not a terribly useful character, <strong>of</strong>course, but it may be <strong>of</strong> some significance <strong>in</strong> evaluat<strong>in</strong>gcontentious birds.Confusion with graellsiiThere are many similarities between juvenilesmithsonianus and dark first-year graellsii, some<strong>of</strong> which can show a confus<strong>in</strong>g comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong>rather dark underparts, heavily patterned rumpand uppertail-coverts and sometimes an apparently‘all-dark’ tail. Most graellsii can, however,be quickly recognized by their more lightweightbuild, narrower, more po<strong>in</strong>ted w<strong>in</strong>gs andslimmer bill than smithsonianus but, s<strong>in</strong>ce not allsmithsonianus are ‘heavyweights’ (plate 5) andsize is not always easily determ<strong>in</strong>ed, the follow<strong>in</strong>gcharacters should be checked:Lack <strong>of</strong> pale w<strong>in</strong>dow on <strong>in</strong>ner primaries Much as <strong>in</strong><strong>European</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Gull</strong>, smithsonianus show a prom<strong>in</strong>entpale w<strong>in</strong>dow on the <strong>in</strong>ner primaries (plate 2and 3). In graellsii, the <strong>in</strong>ner primaries are almost asdark as the outer.Uniformity <strong>of</strong> underparts Generally, never matchedby graellsii but some <strong>of</strong> the latter are potentially confus<strong>in</strong>g(plate 17).Vent and undertail-coverts The ventral area andundertail-coverts <strong>of</strong> juvenile smithsonianus are generallymuch more densely patterned than <strong>in</strong> graellsii(plate 7).Pattern <strong>of</strong> rump and uppertail-coverts Most graellsiishow an obviously whitish rump contrast<strong>in</strong>g witha black tail-band but a few show a pattern and density<strong>of</strong> mark<strong>in</strong>gs that is undeniably close to that <strong>of</strong> lessheavily marked smithsonianus. It is all-too-easy, whenconcentrat<strong>in</strong>g too much on this one feature, to overlookthe other identification clues and mistake suchdark graellsii for smithsonianus.First-w<strong>in</strong>ter (plate 24-58, figure 1)With more than 90% <strong>of</strong> the records <strong>of</strong> smithsonianus<strong>in</strong> Europe be<strong>in</strong>g made up <strong>of</strong> birds <strong>in</strong> firstw<strong>in</strong>terplumage, this is certa<strong>in</strong>ly the bestrepresentedplumage type on the <strong>European</strong> side<strong>of</strong> the Atlantic. At least <strong>in</strong> Ireland, where the vastmajority <strong>of</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Gull</strong>s are <strong>of</strong> thepaler argenteus type, first-w<strong>in</strong>ter smithsonianuscan be rather conspicuous amongst a mid-w<strong>in</strong>tergull flock. Smithsonianus appears to exhibit evenmore <strong>in</strong>dividual variation than argenteus <strong>of</strong> thesame age but even so, we had difficulty f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gbirds <strong>in</strong> the eastern USA that would not attractsome attention <strong>in</strong> a rout<strong>in</strong>e search <strong>of</strong> a gull flockon the <strong>European</strong> side <strong>of</strong> the Atlantic.Many <strong>of</strong> the characters which help differentiatejuvenile smithsonianus and <strong>European</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>Gull</strong>s, most notably those relat<strong>in</strong>g to the upperandundertail-coverts, w<strong>in</strong>gs and tail, rema<strong>in</strong>essentially unchanged <strong>in</strong> first-w<strong>in</strong>ters and thereforedo not need to be repeated here. Additionalcharacters on which to concentrate whenconfronted with a possible first-w<strong>in</strong>ter smithsonianus<strong>in</strong>clude:Uniformity <strong>of</strong> underparts By mid-w<strong>in</strong>ter, many firstyearsmithsonianus are a little faded and less evenlydark than they would have been as juveniles but are stillmore uniform below than the great majority <strong>of</strong><strong>European</strong> <strong>Herr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Gull</strong>s. The latter generally have paler,more mottled or streaked underparts but can occasion-11