Approaches for Business Process oriented knowledge management

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Motivation of GPO- WM Absense of explicit connection between suggested knowledge management approach and business process Adjustment on classical business process modelling but advanced through knowledge aspects Consideration of implicit and explicit knowledge Process specific deduction of knowledge management actions, which consist of previously identified KM Best-Practices c Prof. Dr.-Ing. Norbert Gronau, Universität Potsdam Business process oriented knowledge management (GPO-WM®) Heisig, 2002 Mertins et. al, 2001
GPO- WM approach: Integrated business modeling IUM object classes Generic activity model Connectors IUM-class "product" passed attributes - Ident. - Structure (is part of, composed of) - Relations to other objects - Functions executed on product - Status in product life cycle product-specific attributes "Objects which are processed" (e.g "Products") Object "product" (Status n) c Prof. Dr.-Ing. Norbert Gronau, Universität Potsdam Business process oriented knowledge management (GPO-WM®) IUM-class "order" passed attributes - Ident. - Structure (is part of, composed of) - Relations to other objects - Functions executed on order - Status in order life cycle product-specific attributes Order: stimulates activity Action Resource: executes the activity sequential parallel Case differentiation IUM-class "resource" passed attributes - Ident. - Structure (is part of, composed of) - Relations to other objects - Functions executed on resource - Status in resource life cycle product-specific attributes "processed objects" Object "product" (Status n + 1) Consolidation Loops Heisig (2002), p. 50f
Page 1 and 2: Universität Potsdam Lehrstuhl für
Page 3 and 4: Motivation for launch of Process Or
Page 5 and 6: Competitive factor knowledge Challe
Page 7 and 8: Knowledge management in practice -
Page 9 and 10: Knowledge intensity and process com
Page 11 and 12: Use of integrative consideration Co
Page 13 and 14: PROMOTE
Page 15 and 16: Differentiation between two knowled
Page 17 and 18: Examples of knowledge flows a. Insi
Page 19 and 20: Modelling with PROMOTE by example o
Page 21: Business Process- oriented Knowledg
Page 25 and 26: Closed knowledge circuit Goal & Pro
Page 27 and 28: Tool: Mo²Go c Prof. Dr.-Ing. Norbe
Page 29 and 30: Concept Central point of contact is
Page 31 and 32: Knowledge structure diagrams Busine
Page 33 and 34: Advanced business process models Ex
Page 35 and 36: Tool: ARIS c Prof. Dr.-Ing. Norbert
Page 37 and 38: Collected experience from KM projec
Page 39 and 40: Explicit and implicit knowledge Met
Page 41 and 42: Introduction of KMDL methods
Page 43 and 44: KMDL development Goals Development
Page 45 and 46: KMDL procedural model 0 1 2 Project
Page 47 and 48: Process model Objects Example contr
Page 49 and 50: Information system and process inte
Page 51 and 52: Knowledge and information objects K
Page 53 and 54: Conversion method and function Conv
Page 55 and 56: Illustration of knowledge conversio
Page 57 and 58: Atomic conversions Person A Knowled
Page 59 and 60: Complex conversions Components Exam
Page 61 and 62: Analysis and evaluation processes R
Page 63 and 64: Modelling and analysis of processes
Page 65 and 66: Application area Knowledge transfer
Page 67 and 68: Analysis of Computer Mediated Commu
Page 69 and 70: Which information and functions nee
Page 71 and 72: K- Modelers user interface Navigato
Page 73 and 74:
Control questions Which approach ha
show all

Approaches for Business Process oriented knowledge management

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?