12.07.2015 Views

AR 611-1 - Soldier Support Institute - U.S. Army

AR 611-1 - Soldier Support Institute - U.S. Army

AR 611-1 - Soldier Support Institute - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that of the immediate supervisor. A position authorized a Colonelwill not have immediate subordinates of equal grade. The grade of acivilian supervisor must also be taken into consideration. The followingtwo exceptions will apply:(1) Positions of Chief of Staff authorized as a Colonel may havedirect subordinates of equal grade.(2) Positions authorized a general officer but which are unsupportedmay be filled with a Colonel and may have direct subordinatesof equal grade.b. The generic grade tables for officer positions for TDA, TOE/M T O E , b a t t a l i o n / c o m p a n y a n d m e d i c a l s p e c i a l g r a d i n g m a y b efound in AOC specifications DA Pam <strong>611</strong>–21, Part I.4–29. Grade authorization factorsa. Military grades serve as both pay grades and grades of rank.Grade authorizations contained herein are based upon appropriateconsideration of both to ensure—(1) Grade appropriate to the amount and level of responsibilityinvolved.(2) Rank necessary for the amount and level of both responsibilityand authority involved.(3) Equitable enumeration for duties performed and qualificationsrequired.b. In determining grades for positions not included in the authorizationtables in DA Pam <strong>611</strong>–21, consideration will be given to thefollowing:(1) Organizational setting. The extent to which an incumbentaccrues status and responsibility/authority from the organizationalenvironment in which he must operate. Three subfactors are providedto assist in identifying and evaluating the relevant componentsof this factor.(a) Organizational level. The level, in the <strong>Army</strong>’s organizationalhierarchy, of the headquarters in which the position under considerationis located. Consider levels from team, section or detachment toJoint Chief of Staff/DoD level.( b ) M a g n i t u d e o f o r g a n i z a t i o n a l r e s p o n s i b i l i t y . O n e r e l a t i v emeasure of the total organizational responsibility is the number ofofficer-level position in the headquarters of the organization. Considerthe number of officer-level positions (officer, warrant andprofessional civilian GS–9 or above) in the headquarters identifiedin subfactor (a) above.(c) Level of position within the organization. The level of theposition in the organizational hierarchy of the headquarters identifiedin subfactor (a) above (command section, principal or specialstaff, headquarters support or service element).(2) Positional responsibility authority. The incumbent’s share ofhis organization’s total responsibility. Six subfactors are provided toassist in identifying and evaluating the relevant components of thisfactor.(a) Type of position. Identify the basic function of the position(commander, executive officer, chief of a staff element, assistantstaff officer, equipment or system operator) and the grade of theimmediate supervisor. These are indicators of the functional scopeand relative importance of the position.(b) Magnitude of supervisory responsibility. One measure of thepositional share of the total organizational responsibility is the numbe r o f o f f i c e r l e v e l p o s i t i o n s w i t h i n t h e o r g a n i z a t i o n a l e l e m e n twhich is directed and controlled by the incumbent. Include all officer,warrant and professional civilians (GS–9 or above) in this total.(c) Independence. Consider the nature of the controls over theposition and the extent to which the incumbent is left to his owndevices to achieve the desired results.(d) Communication demands. Consider the extent to which theposition requires skills in oral and written communications.(e) Lateral points of contact. The magnitude of the coordinationand nonsupervisory functions. Consider the organizational level andgrade of person with whom contact is maintained. Organizationalcategories should include military, public or industrial and the newmedia. Disregard contact associated with commemorative or specialevents that occur on an infrequent or irregular basis.(f) Auxiliary authority/responsibility. The extent to which the positionrequirements include significant, recurring additional duties,such as committee/study group participation, administration of militaryjustice, personnel guidance and counseling programs, interiorguard and preventive maintenance or medicine programs.(3) Criticality to organizational mission. The extent to whichsuccess or failure in the management of assigned activities affectsthe organization as a whole. Two subfactors are provided to assist inidentifying and evaluating the relevant components of this factor.(a) Effects of errors. The many activities or groupings of activiti e s i n a n y o r g a n i z a t i o n c a n b e g r a d e d i n t h e o r d e r o f t h e i rcriticality. Consider the extent to which the incumbent’s actions anddecision affect the current operational effectiveness of the organizationas a whole.(b) Effect on future organizational effectiveness. The extent towhich the position incumbent can affect future operational effectiveness.Consider the extent to which the position requirements includethe development of concepts, plans, programs or procedures forfuture organizational activities. Implied in this subfactor is a considerationof the foresight, creativity and originality required.(4) Skills and knowledge required. The level of skills and knowledgerequired for assignment to the position and attainment of asatisfactory level of performance by the end of a 30–day orientationperiod. Three subfactors are provided to assist in identifying andevaluating the relevant components of this factor.(a) Formal education. Consider the level of formal educationaldevelopment required to deal with the academic theories, facts andinformation that will be encountered while serving in the position.(b) General military educational development. The range andsubstance of the overall military perspective which are required todeal with the military data, methods, theories and problems that willbe encountered while serving in the position. Equate this to thecareer development training program of the military professions.(c) Unique specialty training. The extent of the requirement forsubject matter expertise which is acquired only through attendanceat military or industrial training courses especially designed for themilitary function under consideration. Consider the length of thetraining course required.(5) Grade balance. This factor is to be used to prevent gradegaps and ensure a progressive/proportionate distribution of gradesw i t h r e s p e c t t o s u p e r i o r a n d s u b o r d i n a t e p o s i t i o n s w i t h i n t h eorganization.<strong>AR</strong> <strong>611</strong>–1 • 30 September 199713

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!