ProQuest Dissertations - Historia Antigua
ProQuest Dissertations - Historia Antigua ProQuest Dissertations - Historia Antigua
was great excitement; most people regarded it as a most alarming omen. (Trans.Roberts)That Flaminius still observed a religious sacrifice at Ariminum suggests that there was analtar to Jupiter there, which Flaminius deemed a suitable substitute for the CapitolineTemple in Rome. Although this passage is not conclusive evidence that there was a cultto Jupiter in Ariminum, we can infer that an acceptable (to Flaminius' mind) alternativeto the Capitoline Temple was available, most likely an altar to Jupiter. Alternatively, hecould have used a field altar (see Chapter 3 pp. 135-136).The other two locations of temples to Jupiter given by Livy are less conjectural.Livy twice mentions that lightning struck the temple of Jupiter in Minturnae, implyingthat there was indeed such a structure. The strikes took place in 207 BCE and in 191BCE. Livy reports the first strike as affecting both the temple of Jupiter and the grove ofMarica, which was at the mouth of the river. 119Guidobaldi suggests that this means theoriginal temple was outside of the castrum of the original colony, although she admits thelocation is far from certain.After the first strike, the colonists rebuilt the temple,perhaps moving it inside the city. Livy's second notice of a lightning strike mentions thatthe temple and the booths in the forum were struck.Inscriptions reading fulgur havebeen found in the forum, confirming the location of at least the second temple. 122Finally, in 174 BCE, Q. Fulvius Flaccus, censor, let a contract for a temple toJupiter at Pisaurum using colonial funds. The pertinent passage of Livy is corrupted:119 Livy 27.37.2-3120 Guidobaldi and Pesando (1989), p. 39.121 Livy 36.37.3.122 ILLRPpp. 31-35. Guidobaldi and Pesando (1989), pp. 39 and 51-52. Guidobaldi remains cautiousabout the exact date of the inscriptions as they could belong to any lightning strike. Livy records anothersuch portent for 169 BCE (43.13).225
censores eo anno creati Q. Fuluius Flaccus etA. Postumins Albinus legenmtsenatum; .... et alter ex Us Fuluius Flaccus — nam Postumius nihil nisi senatusRomani populiue iussu se locaturum — ipsorum pecunia Iouis aedemPisauri et Fundis et Potentiae ... haec ab uno censore opera locata cum magnagratia colonorum.. Livy 41.27.1, 11, 13.Q. Fulvius Flaccus and A. Postumius Albinus were elected censors this year andrevised the roll of the senate. ... Postumius gave out that without the orders ofthe Roman senate or people he would not spend their money, so Fulvius Flaccus,acting alone, built a temple to Jupiter at Pisaurum and at Fundi ... These workscontracted for by one of the censors were greatly appreciated by the members ofthe colony. (Trans. Roberts)If Flaccus did construct the temple of Jupiter at Pisaurum from colonial funds, then hismotive was certainly to gain the gratitude of the colonists for himself, as Livy asserts atthe end of the same passage. Furthermore, if the emended text is correct in thatPostumius objected, it was not to using Rome's public funds for a colonial buildingproject, since the pair had contracted for tasks at Auximum as well. Rather Postumiusobjected to Q. Fulvius Flaccus using public funds to increase the client-bonds his familygained in Pisaurum, which the censor's brother, Marcus, had founded.Moreover,when one considers the apparent rivalry between the Fulvii and M. Aemilius Lepidus, thecensor's interest in adding a temple of Jupiter to Pisaurum in 174 seems significant. Justthree years previously, Lepidus founded Luna. The capitolium in Luna must have beennearing completion by 174. It is possible that Fulvius was inspired by Lepidus'innovation and the enthusiasm his colonists displayed in erecting two large temples totheir patron's goddesses. It may be a stretch to assume that Fulvius' temples to Jupiter inBispham (2006), pp. 120-1. Cf. Guidobaldi and Pesando (1989), p. 43. Bispham also notes that thebuilding program focuses on citizen colonies and ager Romamis, only where it is not overly advantageousto one man. Latin colonies were not included in Roman urban renewal schemes. The other projects let outwere for the improvement of civic structures, roads, etc. The only bone of contention was the temples, inthis case, and other improvements to land owned by the Fulvius family's clientele.226
- Page 183 and 184: In addition to these politico-relig
- Page 185 and 186: and an inscription found somewhere
- Page 187 and 188: that place, it represented the indi
- Page 189 and 190: the "clear hegemony of the city ove
- Page 191 and 192: Even more so than the example of Fr
- Page 193 and 194: that encompassed the area from the
- Page 195 and 196: proximity to the forum boarium fits
- Page 197 and 198: on the mouth of the Garigliano rive
- Page 199 and 200: although the Soran Hercules was a n
- Page 201 and 202: Italian communities, they also some
- Page 203 and 204: through the actions of one of the c
- Page 205 and 206: worship of Juno: both the birth-rel
- Page 207 and 208: evocatio from Veii.By vowing a temp
- Page 209 and 210: Regina in Luna was clearly a Roman
- Page 211 and 212: spreading perhaps from Capua or Fal
- Page 213 and 214: surely not Diana of the Aventine, b
- Page 215 and 216: disappointment manifested itself ni
- Page 217 and 218: peoples. With this added element, i
- Page 219 and 220: Athena, indicates that the Insubria
- Page 221 and 222: these cults of Minerva show charact
- Page 223 and 224: colonization, contact with Greek co
- Page 225 and 226: they were the offerings of the weal
- Page 227 and 228: As much as the various types of str
- Page 229 and 230: TTepl 8E 2auviTcbv Kai TOIOUTOS TIS
- Page 231 and 232: figurines in an attacking pose, wea
- Page 233: JupiterCults of Jupiter, too, are n
- Page 237 and 238: Ariminum, Minturnae, and Pisaurum d
- Page 239 and 240: In the colonies in Northern Italy,
- Page 241 and 242: Even with this restricted sample se
- Page 243 and 244: to a colony's religious system, but
- Page 245 and 246: since they could not keep the gods
- Page 247 and 248: IV.ConclusionsIn his study of Roman
- Page 249 and 250: colonists are not given a portable
- Page 251 and 252: amount of influence over the type o
- Page 253 and 254: In contrast, the Latin colony in Pa
- Page 255 and 256: II.ConclusionsOverall, trying to cr
- Page 257 and 258: Rome that a Roman army destroyed it
- Page 259 and 260: Volscians as colonists. The rest of
- Page 261 and 262: Saticula: (Festus, Gloss. Lat. p458
- Page 263 and 264: ou Tfjv E^rjynoiv liuETs EV TTJ Trp
- Page 265 and 266: Spain or in Africa, and the decemvi
- Page 267 and 268: During the year a Latin colony was
- Page 269 and 270: T. Maenio praetore urbano creati su
- Page 271 and 272: Colonia Grauiscae eo anno deducta e
- Page 273 and 274: HETOt 5E TOUTOV TOV
- Page 275 and 276: argenti data centum et quinquaginta
- Page 277 and 278: Distribution of Lands in Liguria an
- Page 279 and 280: one of the members lest we make an
- Page 281 and 282: commander. 9The colonial colleges f
- Page 283 and 284: Valerius Tappo, the former tribune
was great excitement; most people regarded it as a most alarming omen. (Trans.Roberts)That Flaminius still observed a religious sacrifice at Ariminum suggests that there was analtar to Jupiter there, which Flaminius deemed a suitable substitute for the CapitolineTemple in Rome. Although this passage is not conclusive evidence that there was a cultto Jupiter in Ariminum, we can infer that an acceptable (to Flaminius' mind) alternativeto the Capitoline Temple was available, most likely an altar to Jupiter. Alternatively, hecould have used a field altar (see Chapter 3 pp. 135-136).The other two locations of temples to Jupiter given by Livy are less conjectural.Livy twice mentions that lightning struck the temple of Jupiter in Minturnae, implyingthat there was indeed such a structure. The strikes took place in 207 BCE and in 191BCE. Livy reports the first strike as affecting both the temple of Jupiter and the grove ofMarica, which was at the mouth of the river. 119Guidobaldi suggests that this means theoriginal temple was outside of the castrum of the original colony, although she admits thelocation is far from certain.After the first strike, the colonists rebuilt the temple,perhaps moving it inside the city. Livy's second notice of a lightning strike mentions thatthe temple and the booths in the forum were struck.Inscriptions reading fulgur havebeen found in the forum, confirming the location of at least the second temple. 122Finally, in 174 BCE, Q. Fulvius Flaccus, censor, let a contract for a temple toJupiter at Pisaurum using colonial funds. The pertinent passage of Livy is corrupted:119 Livy 27.37.2-3120 Guidobaldi and Pesando (1989), p. 39.121 Livy 36.37.3.122 ILLRPpp. 31-35. Guidobaldi and Pesando (1989), pp. 39 and 51-52. Guidobaldi remains cautiousabout the exact date of the inscriptions as they could belong to any lightning strike. Livy records anothersuch portent for 169 BCE (43.13).225