ProQuest Dissertations - Historia Antigua

ProQuest Dissertations - Historia Antigua ProQuest Dissertations - Historia Antigua

historiantigua.cl
from historiantigua.cl More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

was great excitement; most people regarded it as a most alarming omen. (Trans.Roberts)That Flaminius still observed a religious sacrifice at Ariminum suggests that there was analtar to Jupiter there, which Flaminius deemed a suitable substitute for the CapitolineTemple in Rome. Although this passage is not conclusive evidence that there was a cultto Jupiter in Ariminum, we can infer that an acceptable (to Flaminius' mind) alternativeto the Capitoline Temple was available, most likely an altar to Jupiter. Alternatively, hecould have used a field altar (see Chapter 3 pp. 135-136).The other two locations of temples to Jupiter given by Livy are less conjectural.Livy twice mentions that lightning struck the temple of Jupiter in Minturnae, implyingthat there was indeed such a structure. The strikes took place in 207 BCE and in 191BCE. Livy reports the first strike as affecting both the temple of Jupiter and the grove ofMarica, which was at the mouth of the river. 119Guidobaldi suggests that this means theoriginal temple was outside of the castrum of the original colony, although she admits thelocation is far from certain.After the first strike, the colonists rebuilt the temple,perhaps moving it inside the city. Livy's second notice of a lightning strike mentions thatthe temple and the booths in the forum were struck.Inscriptions reading fulgur havebeen found in the forum, confirming the location of at least the second temple. 122Finally, in 174 BCE, Q. Fulvius Flaccus, censor, let a contract for a temple toJupiter at Pisaurum using colonial funds. The pertinent passage of Livy is corrupted:119 Livy 27.37.2-3120 Guidobaldi and Pesando (1989), p. 39.121 Livy 36.37.3.122 ILLRPpp. 31-35. Guidobaldi and Pesando (1989), pp. 39 and 51-52. Guidobaldi remains cautiousabout the exact date of the inscriptions as they could belong to any lightning strike. Livy records anothersuch portent for 169 BCE (43.13).225

censores eo anno creati Q. Fuluius Flaccus etA. Postumins Albinus legenmtsenatum; .... et alter ex Us Fuluius Flaccus — nam Postumius nihil nisi senatusRomani populiue iussu se locaturum — ipsorum pecunia Iouis aedemPisauri et Fundis et Potentiae ... haec ab uno censore opera locata cum magnagratia colonorum.. Livy 41.27.1, 11, 13.Q. Fulvius Flaccus and A. Postumius Albinus were elected censors this year andrevised the roll of the senate. ... Postumius gave out that without the orders ofthe Roman senate or people he would not spend their money, so Fulvius Flaccus,acting alone, built a temple to Jupiter at Pisaurum and at Fundi ... These workscontracted for by one of the censors were greatly appreciated by the members ofthe colony. (Trans. Roberts)If Flaccus did construct the temple of Jupiter at Pisaurum from colonial funds, then hismotive was certainly to gain the gratitude of the colonists for himself, as Livy asserts atthe end of the same passage. Furthermore, if the emended text is correct in thatPostumius objected, it was not to using Rome's public funds for a colonial buildingproject, since the pair had contracted for tasks at Auximum as well. Rather Postumiusobjected to Q. Fulvius Flaccus using public funds to increase the client-bonds his familygained in Pisaurum, which the censor's brother, Marcus, had founded.Moreover,when one considers the apparent rivalry between the Fulvii and M. Aemilius Lepidus, thecensor's interest in adding a temple of Jupiter to Pisaurum in 174 seems significant. Justthree years previously, Lepidus founded Luna. The capitolium in Luna must have beennearing completion by 174. It is possible that Fulvius was inspired by Lepidus'innovation and the enthusiasm his colonists displayed in erecting two large temples totheir patron's goddesses. It may be a stretch to assume that Fulvius' temples to Jupiter inBispham (2006), pp. 120-1. Cf. Guidobaldi and Pesando (1989), p. 43. Bispham also notes that thebuilding program focuses on citizen colonies and ager Romamis, only where it is not overly advantageousto one man. Latin colonies were not included in Roman urban renewal schemes. The other projects let outwere for the improvement of civic structures, roads, etc. The only bone of contention was the temples, inthis case, and other improvements to land owned by the Fulvius family's clientele.226

was great excitement; most people regarded it as a most alarming omen. (Trans.Roberts)That Flaminius still observed a religious sacrifice at Ariminum suggests that there was analtar to Jupiter there, which Flaminius deemed a suitable substitute for the CapitolineTemple in Rome. Although this passage is not conclusive evidence that there was a cultto Jupiter in Ariminum, we can infer that an acceptable (to Flaminius' mind) alternativeto the Capitoline Temple was available, most likely an altar to Jupiter. Alternatively, hecould have used a field altar (see Chapter 3 pp. 135-136).The other two locations of temples to Jupiter given by Livy are less conjectural.Livy twice mentions that lightning struck the temple of Jupiter in Minturnae, implyingthat there was indeed such a structure. The strikes took place in 207 BCE and in 191BCE. Livy reports the first strike as affecting both the temple of Jupiter and the grove ofMarica, which was at the mouth of the river. 119Guidobaldi suggests that this means theoriginal temple was outside of the castrum of the original colony, although she admits thelocation is far from certain.After the first strike, the colonists rebuilt the temple,perhaps moving it inside the city. Livy's second notice of a lightning strike mentions thatthe temple and the booths in the forum were struck.Inscriptions reading fulgur havebeen found in the forum, confirming the location of at least the second temple. 122Finally, in 174 BCE, Q. Fulvius Flaccus, censor, let a contract for a temple toJupiter at Pisaurum using colonial funds. The pertinent passage of Livy is corrupted:119 Livy 27.37.2-3120 Guidobaldi and Pesando (1989), p. 39.121 Livy 36.37.3.122 ILLRPpp. 31-35. Guidobaldi and Pesando (1989), pp. 39 and 51-52. Guidobaldi remains cautiousabout the exact date of the inscriptions as they could belong to any lightning strike. Livy records anothersuch portent for 169 BCE (43.13).225

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!