ProQuest Dissertations - Historia Antigua

ProQuest Dissertations - Historia Antigua ProQuest Dissertations - Historia Antigua

historiantigua.cl
from historiantigua.cl More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

Chapter 4: Religious Landscape and Community BuildingI. IntroductionColonization as a phenomenon involves not only the people occupied with creating a newcolony, but also the local population that is host or neighbor to the colony and, equally asimportant, the landscape in which the colony is founded. As seen in Sluyter's model (cf.chapter 1), the concept of 'landscape' encompasses the material and physical features ofthe land as well as the definitions imposed on the land by its human inhabitants. 1Such alandscape can be described at the macro level, through the use of generalizing models, orat the micro level, through examination of specific sites and contexts. Chapter 3introduced the commissioners' influence over the colonial landscape in general.Expanding on this discussion, the purposes of the first two sections of this chapter are toexplore the ancient Roman definition of what a city landscape contained and also wherein the landscape religious action occurred.After this treatment of the macro-level models of ancient religious landscapes, thechapter turns to examples of certain colonies in Southern Italy: Fregellae, Paestum, andSora. These three studies suggest that the religious landscape of each colony, althoughunique in every case, acted to define boundaries, demarcate colonial space, claimcommon identities, and integrate various inhabitants into one, unified group. Moreover,each colonial pantheon had a unique level of correlation (or lack thereof) with the'Sluyter(2002),p.23.2 Riva and Stoddard (1996), p. 93. I follow Riva and Stoddard in embracing discussion of both the macroand micro level of landscapes (contra Tilley 1994). While the specific context landscape analysis is usefulfor understanding a single site, the generalized models offered in this chapter assist in illuminating trends,insofar as they exist, in colonial religious practices.145

eligious system at Rome. This suggests that there was no set policy of imposing Romanreligion on the mid-Republican colonies.II.Romans and the Landscape: City, Citizens, and GodsAs seen in chapter 1, the study of landscape in terms of religion and colonization iscurrently a popular topic in modern scholarship. It remains to verify that the importanceof religious spaces in a landscape is not an anachronistic imposition on a study of thecolonies of the period in question. Thus, the following section analyzes how a city wasdefined in the middle Republic and its historiography.The answer to how the Roman elite defined a city and its landscape lies withintheir treatment of cities that surrendered to the people of Rome. Two passages in Livy, inparticular, suggest that the Romans 4 considered a city to include people and theirbelongings as well as the natural and built landscape. Livy 1.38 presents a formula ofsurrender which King Tarquin demanded of the people of Collatia."Deditisne vos populumque Collatinum, urbem, agros, aquam, terminos, delubra,utensilia, divina humanaque omnia, in meam populique Romani dicionem? " Livy1.38.2."Do you surrender into my power and that of the People of Rome yourselves, and thepeople of Collatia, your city, lands, water, boundaries, temples, sacred vessels, allthings divine and human?" [C. Roberts, trans.]3 Examples include Crumley in Ashmore and Knapp (1999), Gargola (1995), Laurence in Wilkins (1996),Sluyter (2002), and Zanker (2000).4 The use of the collective noun "Romans" in the first two sections of this chapter is not intended to indicatethat each person living in Rome can be assumed to have held the same definition of landscape during themiddle Republic. Rather it follows the convention of authors such as Livy or Appian, who sometimesdiscuss the Roman people as a collective. For ease of discussing a general model of what a city wasaccording to the evidence we have from some members of the Roman elite or the historiographers of theRepublican period, the generalization "Romans" will be allowed to stand.146

Chapter 4: Religious Landscape and Community BuildingI. IntroductionColonization as a phenomenon involves not only the people occupied with creating a newcolony, but also the local population that is host or neighbor to the colony and, equally asimportant, the landscape in which the colony is founded. As seen in Sluyter's model (cf.chapter 1), the concept of 'landscape' encompasses the material and physical features ofthe land as well as the definitions imposed on the land by its human inhabitants. 1Such alandscape can be described at the macro level, through the use of generalizing models, orat the micro level, through examination of specific sites and contexts. Chapter 3introduced the commissioners' influence over the colonial landscape in general.Expanding on this discussion, the purposes of the first two sections of this chapter are toexplore the ancient Roman definition of what a city landscape contained and also wherein the landscape religious action occurred.After this treatment of the macro-level models of ancient religious landscapes, thechapter turns to examples of certain colonies in Southern Italy: Fregellae, Paestum, andSora. These three studies suggest that the religious landscape of each colony, althoughunique in every case, acted to define boundaries, demarcate colonial space, claimcommon identities, and integrate various inhabitants into one, unified group. Moreover,each colonial pantheon had a unique level of correlation (or lack thereof) with the'Sluyter(2002),p.23.2 Riva and Stoddard (1996), p. 93. I follow Riva and Stoddard in embracing discussion of both the macroand micro level of landscapes (contra Tilley 1994). While the specific context landscape analysis is usefulfor understanding a single site, the generalized models offered in this chapter assist in illuminating trends,insofar as they exist, in colonial religious practices.145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!